Personal Learning Environments (PLEs) in a Distance Learning Course on Mathematics Applied to Business

This paper argues that the dominant form of distance learning that is common in most e-learning systems rests on a set of learning devices and environments that may be outdated from the student’s perspective, namely because it is not supportive of learner empowerment and does not facilitate the efforts of self-directed learners. For this study we gathered and examined data on student’s use of Personal Learning Environments (PLEs) within a course on Mathematics Applied to Business offered by the Portuguese Open University (Universidade Aberta). We base the discussion on aspects that characterize student’s conceptions of PLEs, the emergence of connectivism as a new account of how learning occurs in a networked global environment, and conclude that an important goal of online course design should be to let students explore what the emergent Web 2.0 tools have to offer in distance learning. The widespread adoption of PLEs, bringing together learning from different contexts and sources of learning, shows that students are capable of expression in different forms, generating an added-value to distance learning environments.

[1]  P. Panagiotidis VLEs vs. PLEs for Higher Education Institutions , 2013 .

[2]  Denis Gillet,et al.  From LMS to PLE: A Step Forward through OpenSocial Apps in Moodle , 2012, ICWL.

[3]  Betsy Duke,et al.  Connectivism as a Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2012 .

[4]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Interoperability in eLearning Contexts. Interaction between LMS and PLE , 2012, SLATE.

[5]  Nada Dabbagh,et al.  Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[6]  Fridolin Wild,et al.  Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments , 2011 .

[7]  Stephen Marshall,et al.  Change, Technology and Higher Education: Are Universities Capable of Organisational Change?. , 2010 .

[8]  Stephen Downes,et al.  New Technology Supporting Informal Learning , 2010 .

[9]  P. Simões,et al.  Personal learning environments no contexto virtual de um mestrado em comunicação educacional multimédia , 2010 .

[10]  Norbert Pachler,et al.  Narrative and learning with Web 2.0 technologies: towards a research agenda , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[11]  José Carlos Mota,et al.  Da Web 2.0 ao E-learning 2.0 : aprender na rede , 2009 .

[12]  Robert Godwin-Jones,et al.  EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS , 2009 .

[13]  Mark van Harmelen,et al.  Design trajectories: four experiments in PLE implementation , 2008, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[14]  Charles R. Severance,et al.  The coming functionality mash-up in Personal Learning Environments , 2008, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[15]  Mark William Johnson,et al.  The Personal Learning Environment and the human condition: from theory to teaching practice , 2008, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[16]  Scott Wilson,et al.  Patterns of Personal Learning Environments , 2008, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[17]  Alan Brown,et al.  Maturing Learning : Mashup Personal Learning Environments , 2008 .

[18]  Graham Attwell,et al.  Personal Learning Environments - the future of eLearning? , 2007 .

[19]  Mark William Johnson,et al.  Personal Learning Environments: Challenging the Dominant Design of Educational Systems , 2006, EC-TEL Workshops.

[20]  D. Shaffer Epistemic Frames and Islands of Expertise: Learning from Infusion Experiences , 2004, ICLS.

[21]  Adrian Kirkwood,et al.  Understanding Independent Learners' Use of Media Technologies , 2003 .

[22]  Mike Sharples,et al.  Disruptive devices: mobile technology for conversational learning , 2002 .

[23]  A. Damasio The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness , 1999 .

[24]  Sean A. Spence,et al.  Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .