Modeling conditional dependence among multiple diagnostic tests

When multiple imperfect dichotomous diagnostic tests are applied to an individual, it is possible that some or all of their results remain dependent even after conditioning on the true disease status. The estimates could be biased if this conditional dependence is ignored when using the test results to infer about the prevalence of a disease or the accuracies of the diagnostic tests. However, statistical methods correcting for this bias by modelling higher‐order conditional dependence terms between multiple diagnostic tests are not well addressed in the literature. This paper extends a Bayesian fixed effects model for 2 diagnostic tests with pairwise correlation to cases with 3 or more diagnostic tests with higher order correlations. Simulation results show that the proposed fixed effects model works well both in the case when the tests are highly correlated and in the case when the tests are truly conditionally independent, provided adequate external information is available in the form of fixed constraints or prior distributions. A data set on the diagnosis of childhood pulmonary tuberculosis is used to illustrate the proposed model.

[1]  L. Joseph,et al.  Understanding the effects of conditional dependence in research studies involving imperfect diagnostic tests , 2017, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  Maarten van Smeden,et al.  Diagnostic Test Accuracy in Childhood Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Bayesian Latent Class Analysis. , 2016, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  The No-U-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[4]  J. Meers,et al.  Validation of real-time polymerase chain reaction tests for diagnosing feline immunodeficiency virus infection in domestic cats using Bayesian latent class models. , 2012, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[5]  Huiping Xu,et al.  A Probit Latent Class Model with General Correlation Structures for Evaluating Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests , 2009, Biometrics.

[6]  Nandini Dendukuri,et al.  Modeling conditional dependence between diagnostic tests: A multiple latent variable model , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  Emmanuel Lesaffre,et al.  Estimating Disease Prevalence in a Bayesian Framework Using Probabilistic Constraints , 2006, Epidemiology.

[8]  P. Gustafson.  On Model Expansion, Model Contraction, Identifiability and Prior Information: Two Illustrative Scenarios Involving Mismeasured Variables , 2005 .

[9]  Nandini Dendukuri,et al.  Bayesian Sample Size Determination for Prevalence and Diagnostic Test Studies in the Absence of a Gold Standard Test , 2004, Biometrics.

[10]  L. Joseph,et al.  Bayesian Approaches to Modeling the Conditional Dependence Between Multiple Diagnostic Tests , 2001, Biometrics.

[11]  S D Walter,et al.  Effects of dependent errors in the assessment of diagnostic test performance. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  M. Tan,et al.  Random effects models in latent class analysis for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests. , 1996, Biometrics.

[13]  L. Joseph,et al.  Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  M. Espeland,et al.  Using latent class models to characterize and assess relative error in discrete measurements. , 1989, Biometrics.

[15]  S D Walter,et al.  Estimation of test error rates, disease prevalence and relative risk from misclassified data: a review. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  P M Vacek,et al.  The effect of conditional dependence on the evaluation of diagnostic tests. , 1985, Biometrics.

[17]  S. Walter,et al.  Estimating the error rates of diagnostic tests. , 1980, Biometrics.