The Construction and Validation of the OASys Violence Predictor

The Offender Assessment System (OASys) is the risk assessment and management system routinely used in the National Offender Management Service (NOMS), the prison and probation service for England and Wales. This study describes the construction and validation of a new actuarial violence risk measure, the OASys Violence Predictor (OVP), using OASys and Police National Computer data. Ordinal logistic regression identifies static and dynamic risk factors predictive of violent recidivism among convicted offenders (N = 15,918). These form the basis of a user-friendly 100-point scale (OVP). OVP achieves significantly greater predictive validity than existing actuarial scores available within NOMS (the original OASys risk prediction score; the Offender Group Reconviction Scale, Version 3; and the V scale of the Risk Matrix 2000) on a later validation sample (N = 49,346). The discussion considers explanations for this improvement, examines the utility of dynamic risk factors in violence prediction, and describes the application of OVP in the NOMS treatment allocation and risk management practice.

[1]  Stephen C. P. Wong,et al.  The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. , 2007, Psychological assessment.

[2]  Developing an empirical classification of violent offences for use in the prediction of recidivism in England and Wales , 2011 .

[3]  Martin Grann,et al.  Actuarial Assessment of Violence Risk , 2007 .

[4]  Natalie J. Jones,et al.  Predicting Criminal Recidivism in Adult Male Offenders , 2010 .

[5]  Stephen D. Gottfredson,et al.  Clinical Versus Actuarial Judgments in Criminal Justice Decisions: Should One Replace the Other? , 2006 .

[6]  P. Howard,et al.  Individual Confidence Intervals Do Not Inform Decision-Makers About the Accuracy of Risk Assessment Evaluations , 2010, Law and human behavior.

[7]  K. Miotto,et al.  Substance abuse and violence: A review of the literature , 2003 .

[8]  Assessment of Interpersonal Aggression and Violence , 2006, Assessment.

[9]  K. Heilbrun,et al.  Violence risk assessment tools: Overview and critical analysis. , 2011 .

[10]  D. Cooke,et al.  Limitations of Diagnostic Precision and Predictive Utility in the Individual Case: A Challenge for Forensic Practice , 2009, Law and human behavior.

[11]  K. Howells.  Recent developments and future directions in understanding cognition and emotion in offenders: a commentary , 2009 .

[12]  Antonio Andrés Pueyo,et al.  THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CRIMINAL CONDUCT , 2008 .

[13]  G. Mair,et al.  ‘The worst tax form you’ve ever seen’? Probation officers’ views about OASys , 2006 .

[14]  Leon T. Stern,et al.  Probation In Europe , 1928 .

[15]  R. K. Hanson,et al.  Twenty Years of Progress in Violence Risk Assessment , 2005, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[16]  D. Thornton,et al.  Distinguishing and Combining Risks for Sexual and Violent Recidivism , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  K. Heilbrun.  Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. , 1998 .

[18]  Robert D. Hare,et al.  The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised , 1996 .

[19]  S. Hart,et al.  Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: evaluating the 'margins of error' of group v. individual predictions of violence. , 2007, The British journal of psychiatry. Supplement.

[20]  Jennifer L. Skeem,et al.  VIOLENCE RISK ASSESSMENT: Getting Specific About Being Dynamic , 2005 .

[21]  Jeremy Coid,et al.  Applying Neural Networks and other statistical models to the classification of serious offenders and the prediction of recidivism , 2010 .

[22]  K. Douglas,et al.  Handbook of violence risk assessment. , 2010 .

[23]  Daryl G Kroner,et al.  A coffee can, factor analysis, and prediction of antisocial behavior: the structure of criminal risk. , 2005, International journal of law and psychiatry.

[24]  F. Harrell,et al.  Prognostic/Clinical Prediction Models: Multivariable Prognostic Models: Issues in Developing Models, Evaluating Assumptions and Adequacy, and Measuring and Reducing Errors , 2005 .

[25]  G. Walters.  Methodological and Statistical Advances in Correctional and Forensic Psychology , 2007 .

[26]  P. Howard,et al.  Identifying change in the likelihood of violent recidivism: causal dynamic risk factors in the OASys violence predictor. , 2013, Law and human behavior.

[27]  Toni Hemmati,et al.  The validity of violence risk estimates: An issue of item performance. , 2007 .

[28]  P. Howard.  The Offender Assessment System: an evaluation of the second pilot , 2006 .

[29]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[30]  K. Glenk,et al.  Validity and Reliability , 2008, Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments.

[31]  K. Douglas,et al.  Comparative Validity Analysis of Multiple Measures of Violence Risk in a Sample of Criminal Offenders , 2005 .

[32]  D. A. Andrews,et al.  The level of service inventory – revised , 1995 .

[33]  Ioan Durnescu,et al.  Probation in Europe , 2008 .

[34]  C. Hollin,et al.  Allocation to Offending Behavior Programs in the English and Welsh Probation Service , 2009 .

[35]  M. Seto.  Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders. , 2005, Psychological assessment.

[36]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Coming to terms with the terms of risk. , 1997, Archives of general psychiatry.

[37]  C.J.H. Mann,et al.  Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation and Updating , 2009 .

[38]  P. Howard,et al.  OGRS 3:the revised Offender Group Reconviction Scale , 2009 .

[39]  Grant T. Harris,et al.  Comparing Effect Sizes in Follow-Up Studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r , 2005, Law and human behavior.

[40]  D. Thornton.  Constructing and Testing a Framework for Dynamic Risk Assessment , 2002, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[41]  D. Cooke,et al.  Limitations of Diagnostic Precision and Predictive Utility in the Individual Case: A Challenge for Forensic Practice , 2009 .

[42]  Shelley L. Brown,et al.  The Dynamic Prediction of Criminal Recidivism: A Three-wave Prospective Study , 2009, Law and human behavior.

[43]  James Bonta,et al.  The Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI): Reliability and Validity in Female Offenders , 2009 .

[44]  Stephen C. P. Wong,et al.  The efficacy of violence prediction: a meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.