Experimental investigation on influence of different transverse fire locations on maximum smoke temperature under the tunnel ceiling

Abstract In former studies, fires were always assumed to occur at the longitudinal centerline of tunnels. In fact, fires will occur at any locations in tunnels, with different distances to the sidewall. A set of model scale experiments were carried out, to investigate the influence of different transverse fire locations on maximum smoke temperature under the tunnel ceiling. Results show that the restriction effect of the sidewalls of tunnels cause the maximum smoke temperature rise under the ceiling to increase compared with the unconfined space, even fires occurs at the longitudinal centerline. The maximum smoke temperature rises above the fire keep almost unchanged with the fire moving closer to the sidewall at the beginning and then increase significantly after the distance between the fire and the sidewall decreases to a certain value. For small pools of wall fire, the “mirror” effect is reasonable, and for large pools, will bring a relatively large error without considering the influence of the equivalent diameter of a wall fire, resulting in underestimating the mass flow rate of fire plume and then overestimating the smoke temperature. Under all fires, the maximum smoke temperature rise under the ceiling decreases exponentially as the longitudinal distance from fire increases. Correlations for related parameters are proposed.

[1]  Alan N. Beard,et al.  Fire safety in tunnels , 2009 .

[2]  R. Huo,et al.  Comparative study on carbon monoxide stratification and thermal stratification in a horizontal channel fire , 2012 .

[3]  Gong Yan-feng,et al.  Full-scale experimental study on smoke flow in natural ventilation road tunnel fires with shafts , 2009 .

[4]  Wan Ki Chow,et al.  On the maximum smoke temperature under the ceiling in tunnel fires , 2006 .

[5]  Haukur Ingason,et al.  The maximum temperature of buoyancy-driven smoke flow beneath the ceiling in tunnel fires , 2011 .

[6]  R. Huo,et al.  Experimental studies on fire-induced buoyant smoke temperature distribution along tunnel ceiling , 2007 .

[7]  Dong Hyeon Kim,et al.  Critical velocity and burning rate in pool fire during longitudinal ventilation , 2007 .

[8]  E. E. Zukoski,et al.  Properties of fire plumes , 1995 .

[9]  Olivier Vauquelin,et al.  Influence of tunnel width on longitudinal smoke control , 2006 .

[10]  Jie Ji,et al.  A simplified calculation method on maximum smoke temperature under the ceiling in subway station fires , 2011 .

[11]  T. Kubota,et al.  Entrainment in Fire Plumes , 1981 .

[12]  Haukur Ingason,et al.  Model scale tunnel fire tests with longitudinal ventilation , 2010 .

[13]  Y. Alarie,et al.  Toxicity of Fire Smoke , 2002, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[14]  Dezhi Zhu,et al.  Full-scale experiment research and theoretical study for fires in tunnels with roof openings , 2009 .

[15]  A Leitner,et al.  THE FIRE CATASTROPHE IN THE TAUERN TUNNEL: EXPERIENCE AND CONCLUSIONS FOR THE AUSTRIAN GUIDELINES , 2001 .

[16]  James G. Quintiere,et al.  Enclosure Fire Dynamics , 1999 .

[17]  R. L. Alpert.  Calculation of response time of ceiling-mounted fire detectors , 1972 .

[18]  Hiroomi Satoh,et al.  Fire properties in near field of square fire source with longitudinal ventilation in tunnels , 2003 .

[19]  J. Ris.  Fire radiation—A review , 1979 .

[20]  Haukur Ingason,et al.  Study of critical velocity and backlayering length in longitudinally ventilated tunnel fires , 2010 .

[21]  Y. Wu,et al.  Control of smoke flow in tunnel fires using longitudinal ventilation systems - a study of the critical velocity , 2000 .

[22]  Hong Sun Ryou,et al.  An experimental study on the effect of ventilation velocity on burning rate in tunnel fires—heptane pool fire case , 2008 .