A multilevel model of safety climate: cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates.

Organizational climates have been investigated separately at organization and subunit levels. This article tests a multilevel model of safety climate, covering both levels of analysis. Results indicate that organization-level and group-level climates are globally aligned, and the effect of organization climate on safety behavior is fully mediated by group climate level. However, the data also revealed meaningful group-level variation in a single organization, attributable to supervisory discretion in implementing formal procedures associated with competing demands like safety versus productivity. Variables that limit supervisory discretion (i.e., organization climate strength and procedural formalization) reduce both between-groups climate variation and within-group variability (i.e., increased group climate strength), although effect sizes were smaller than those associated with cross-level climate relationships. Implications for climate theory are discussed.

[1]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[2]  M. Mcluhan.  Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man , 1964 .

[3]  R. Kahn,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[4]  C. Perrow.  A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[5]  M. Aiken,et al.  Routine Technology, Social Structure, and Organization Goals , 1969 .

[6]  C. Perrow.  Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay , 1975 .

[7]  Norman S. Endler,et al.  Interactional psychology and personality , 1976 .

[8]  P. Wright.  The Social Psychology of Organizations, (2nd Ed): Daniel Katz and Robert L. Kahn New York: Wiley, 1978, 838 pp. , 1979 .

[9]  D. Zohar.  Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. , 1980, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Arnon E. Reichers,et al.  On the Etiology of Climates. , 1983 .

[11]  B. Schneider,et al.  Employee and customer perceptions of service in banks: Replication and extension. , 1985 .

[12]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[13]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Steve W. J. Kozlowski,et al.  Integration of climate and leadership: Examination of a neglected issue. , 1989 .

[15]  M E Paté-Cornell,et al.  Organizational aspects of engineering system safety: the case of offshore platforms. , 1990, Science.

[16]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Lay epistemic theory in social-cognitive psychology. , 1990 .

[17]  J. Rentsch.  Climate and culture : interaction and qualitative differences in organizational meanings , 1990 .

[18]  C. O'Reilly.  Organizational behavior: where we've been, where we're going. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[19]  Joanne D. Martin.  Cultures in Organizations: Three Perspectives , 1992 .

[20]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Cultures of Work Organizations. , 1992 .

[21]  N. Sanders,et al.  Journal of behavioral decision making: "The need for contextual and technical knowledge in judgmental forecasting", 5 (1992) 39-52 , 1992 .

[22]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Utility maximization and melioration: Internalities in individual choice , 1993 .

[23]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[24]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Politics in Schools: Micro, Macro, and Logics of Action , 1993 .

[25]  K. Klein,et al.  Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and Analysis , 1994 .

[26]  Marcel Simard,et al.  A multilevel analysis of organisational factors related to the taking of safety initiatives by work groups , 1995 .

[27]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice , 1995 .

[28]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[29]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[30]  R. Littell.  SAS System for Mixed Models , 1996 .

[31]  Peter A. Bamberger,et al.  The Organizational Transformation Process: The Micropolitics of Dissonance Reduction and the Allignment of Logics of Action , 1996 .

[32]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  A CROSS-LEVEL INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS INFLUENCING UNSAFE BEHAVIORS AND ACCIDENTS , 1996 .

[33]  Marcel Simard,et al.  Workgroups' propensity to comply with safety rules: the influence of micro-macro organisational factors , 1997 .

[34]  Joy Palmer,et al.  The Human Organization , 1997, J. Knowl. Manag..

[35]  Fred Luthans,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Organizational Behavior Modification on Task Performance, 1975–95 , 1997 .

[36]  Susan S. White,et al.  Relationship marketing: An organizational perspective , 1997 .

[37]  A. Roth,et al.  Predicting How People Play Games: Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Games with Unique, Mixed Strategy Equilibria , 1998 .

[38]  N. Anderson,et al.  Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory , 1998 .

[39]  Judith D. Singer,et al.  Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models , 1998 .

[40]  A Marchand,et al.  From a unidimensional to a bidimensional concept and measurement of workers' safety behavior. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[41]  D. Chan.  Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[42]  J. Komaki,et al.  Leadership from an Operant Perspective , 1998 .

[43]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  Centering Decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models: Implications for Research in Organizations , 1998 .

[44]  Robert K. Kazanjian,et al.  Multilevel Theorizing about Creativity in Organizations: A Sensemaking Perspective , 1999 .

[45]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development , 1999 .

[46]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[47]  A Neal,et al.  Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. , 2000, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[48]  Jagdip Singh.  Performance Productivity and Quality of Frontline Employees in Service Organizations , 2000 .

[49]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  Multilevel Analytical Techniques: Commonalties, Differences, and Continuing Questions. , 2000 .

[50]  Nathan Bennett,et al.  A Case for Procedural Justice Climate: Development and Test of a Multilevel Model. , 2000 .

[51]  N. Ashkanasy,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate , 2000 .

[52]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features☆ , 2000 .

[53]  D. Zohar.  A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. , 2000 .

[55]  M. Lindell,et al.  Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, a n d M e t h o d s i n Organizations Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2022 .

[57]  J. M. Stewart.  Managing for World Class Safety , 2001 .

[58]  Fred Luthans,et al.  Differential Effects of Incentive Motivators on Work Performance , 2001 .

[59]  G. Molenberghs,et al.  Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data , 2001 .

[60]  I. Elaine Allen.  Measuring and Analyzing Behavior In Organizations , 2002 .

[61]  E. Kelloway,et al.  Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[62]  M. West.  Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups , 2002 .

[63]  D. Zohar.  The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups , 2002 .

[64]  B. Schneider,et al.  Climate strength: a new direction for climate research. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[65]  Hale Kaynak,et al.  The relationship between total quality management: practices and their effects on firm performance , 2003 .

[66]  Lois E. Tetrick,et al.  Handbook of occupational health psychology , 2003 .

[67]  I. Erev,et al.  Small feedback‐based decisions and their limited correspondence to description‐based decisions , 2003 .

[68]  Stephen J. Gerras,et al.  Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: safety climate as an exemplar. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[69]  D. Zohar,et al.  Climate as a social-cognitive construction of supervisory safety practices: scripts as proxy of behavior patterns. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[70]  M. Frone,et al.  The psychology of workplace safety. , 2004 .

[71]  Julian Barling,et al.  High-performance work systems and occupational safety. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.