A New Stochastic Kriging Method for Modeling Multi-Source Exposure–Response Data in Toxicology Studies

One of the most fundamental steps in risk assessment is to quantify the exposure–response relationship for the material/chemical of interest. This work develops a new statistical method, referred to as SKQ (stochastic kriging with qualitative factors), to synergistically model exposure–response data, which often arise from multiple sources (e.g., laboratories, animal providers, and shapes of nanomaterials) in toxicology studies. Compared to the existing methods, SKQ has several distinct features. First, SKQ integrates data across multiple sources and allows for the derivation of more accurate information from limited data. Second, SKQ is highly flexible and able to model practically any continuous response surfaces (e.g., dose–time–response surface). Third, SKQ is able to accommodate variance heterogeneity across experimental conditions and to provide valid statistical inference (i.e., quantify uncertainties of the model estimates). Through empirical studies, we have demonstrated SKQ’s ability to efficiently model exposure–response surfaces by pooling information across multiple data sources. SKQ fits into the mosaic of efficient decision-making methods for assessing the risk of a tremendously large variety of nanomaterials and helps to alleviate safety concerns regarding the enormous amount of new nanomaterials.

[1]  Nianqiang Wu,et al.  Two-Stage Experimental Design for Dose-Response Modeling in Toxicology Studies. , 2013, ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering.

[2]  Barry L. Nelson,et al.  Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling , 2008, 2008 Winter Simulation Conference.

[3]  Xi Chen,et al.  The effects of common random numbers on stochastic kriging metamodels , 2012, TOMC.

[4]  Nianqiang Wu,et al.  Impedance-metric Pt/YSZ/Au–Ga2O3 sensor for CO detection at high temperature , 2005 .

[5]  Feng Yang,et al.  Differential mouse pulmonary dose and time course responses to titanium dioxide nanospheres and nanobelts. , 2013, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[6]  A. John Bailer,et al.  An empirical comparison of effective concentration estimators for evaluating aquatic toxicity test responses , 2000 .

[7]  Wout Slob,et al.  Dose-response modeling of continuous endpoints. , 2002, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[8]  Guang-Bin Huang,et al.  Classification ability of single hidden layer feedforward neural networks , 2000, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst..

[9]  J F Boisvieux,et al.  Alternative approaches to estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters: comparison with the nonlinear mixed-effect model. , 1984, Drug metabolism reviews.

[10]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  R. Kass,et al.  Approximate Bayesian Inference in Conditionally Independent Hierarchical Models (Parametric Empirical Bayes Models) , 1989 .

[12]  Nianqiang Wu,et al.  In situ construction of a titanate–silver nanoparticle–titanate sandwich nanostructure on a metallic titanium surface for bacteriostatic and biocompatible implants , 2012 .

[13]  Paul D. W. Kirk,et al.  Gaussian process regression bootstrapping: exploring the effects of uncertainty in time course data , 2009, Bioinform..

[14]  K. Crump,et al.  Critical issues in benchmark calculations from continuous data. , 2002, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[15]  Marie Davidian,et al.  Bootstrap-Adjusted Calibration Confidence Intervals for Immunoassay , 1997 .

[16]  Marie Davidian,et al.  Nonlinear Models for Repeated Measurement Data , 1995 .

[17]  Xi Chen,et al.  Enhancing Stochastic Kriging Metamodels with Gradient Estimators , 2013, Oper. Res..

[18]  Ayyakkannu Manivannan,et al.  Highly conductive electrospun carbon nanofiber/MnO2 coaxial nano-cables for high energy and power density supercapacitors , 2012 .

[19]  M Davidian,et al.  Assays for recombinant proteins: a problem in non-linear calibration. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  G Dunn,et al.  'Optimal' designs for drug, neurotransmitter and hormone receptor assays. , 1988, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  Shiyu Zhou,et al.  A Simple Approach to Emulation for Computer Models With Qualitative and Quantitative Factors , 2011, Technometrics.

[22]  Salomon Sand,et al.  Dose-response modeling and benchmark calculations from spontaneous behavior data on mice neonatally exposed to 2,2',4,4',5-pentabromodiphenyl ether. , 2004, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[23]  Nianqiang Wu,et al.  Detection of mercury(II) by quantum dot/DNA/gold nanoparticle ensemble based nanosensor via nanometal surface energy transfer. , 2011, Analytical chemistry.

[24]  Frank Bretz,et al.  Dose Finding – A Challenge in Statistics , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[25]  Ayyakkannu Manivannan,et al.  Reduced graphene oxide/titanium dioxide composites for supercapacitor electrodes: shape and coupling effects , 2012 .

[26]  Nianqiang Wu,et al.  Porous CuO–ZnO nanocomposite for sensing electrode of high-temperature CO solid-state electrochemical sensor , 2005 .

[27]  Feng Yang,et al.  Neural network metamodeling for cycle time-throughput profiles in manufacturing , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Nianqiang Wu,et al.  Detection of adenosine triphosphate with an aptamer biosensor based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[29]  Salomon Sand,et al.  The Benchmark Dose Method—Review of Available Models, and Recommendations for Application in Health Risk Assessment , 2003, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[30]  K S Crump,et al.  A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. , 1984, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[31]  W. Slob,et al.  Mathematical modelling and quantitative methods. , 2002, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[32]  A. John Bailer,et al.  Bayesian approach to estimating reproductive inhibition potency in aquatic toxicity testing , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[33]  Lina Schelin,et al.  Kriging Prediction Intervals Based on Semiparametric Bootstrap , 2010 .

[34]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[35]  Peter Z. G. Qian,et al.  Gaussian Process Models for Computer Experiments With Qualitative and Quantitative Factors , 2008, Technometrics.

[36]  G. F. Krause,et al.  Estimation of acute toxicity by fitting a dose-time-response surface. , 1995, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[37]  Sara Sjöstedt de Luna,et al.  The Bootstrap and Kriging Prediction Intervals , 2003 .

[38]  Sonja Kuhnt,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 2010 .

[39]  L. Skovgaard NONLINEAR MODELS FOR REPEATED MEASUREMENT DATA. , 1996 .