Feasibility of verbal analysis application to solving the problems of investment in construction

In project development it is hardly possible to get exhaustive and accurate information. As a result, the situations occur, the consequences of which can be very damaging to the project. Inaccurate evaluation of the strategy related to capital investment and project implementation is one of the reasons why such estimates are not required in practice. Instead, classification approaches may be used for this purpose. Contractors of international construction projects are often faced with complicated situations working in the conditions of uncertainty in construction. One of the potential risk factors is associated with the requirements of contract conditions. One of the major aspects is project or contract management. Project developers need various models of large and complex projects' management. The suggested method for evaluating contract effectiveness may be successfully applied at one of the stages of project management. This paper presents methods of multiattribute comparative analysis (CLARA and UniComBOS methods) of variants of classified investment risks and contract alternatives in investment and building projects of construction. A practical case illustrating the work of the methods is presented.

[1]  O. Larichev Cognitive validity in design of decision‐aiding techniques , 1992 .

[2]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences , 1973 .

[3]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP) , 2005, Automation in Construction.

[4]  Sigitas Mitkus,et al.  Reasoned decisions in construction contracts evaluation , 2008 .

[5]  Leonas Ustinovichius,et al.  Determination of efficiency of investments in construction , 2004 .

[6]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multicriteria selection of project managers by applying grey criteria , 2008 .

[7]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP): Part 2: A case study in bridge design , 2006 .

[8]  E. M. Furems,et al.  Interactive Procedure For Non-Transitivity Revealing And Correcting Under Pairwise Comparisons , 1992 .

[9]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  Evaluating the alternative solutions of wall insulation by multicriteria methods , 2008 .

[10]  Violeta Keršuliene,et al.  Possibilities of clients and contractor's disputes settlement at the pretrial stage , 2007 .

[11]  Min-Yuan Cheng,et al.  Simulation‐enhanced approach for ranking major transport projects , 2006 .

[12]  Oleg I. Larichev,et al.  Decision support system for classification of a finite set of multicriteria alternatives , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Leonas Ustinovichius,et al.  Multiattribute Analysis of Investment Risks in Construction , 2008 .

[14]  Sigitas Mitkus,et al.  Analysis of criteria system model for construction contract evaluation , 2007 .

[15]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Multi‐objective contractor's ranking by applying the Moora method , 2008 .

[16]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selection of low-e windows in retrofit of public buildings by applying multiple criteria method COPRAS: A Lithuanian case , 2006 .

[17]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Defining the utility and market value of a real estate: A multiple criteria approach , 2007 .

[18]  Egidijus Rytas Vaidogas Risk Oriented Design of Protective Highway Structures , 2007 .

[19]  David Arditi,et al.  Perceptions of Process Quality in Building Projects , 1999 .

[20]  Hassan Ziari,et al.  INTERFACE CONDITION INFLUENCE ON PREDICTION OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT LIFE , 2007 .

[21]  Ghassan Aouad,et al.  Learning from risks: A tool for post-project risk assessment , 2008 .

[22]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  Multi‐attribute contractors ranking method by applying ordering of feasible alternatives of solutions in terms of preferability technique , 2008 .

[23]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Contractor selection of construction in a competitive environment , 2008 .

[24]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  A checklist for assessing sustainability performance of construction projects , 2007 .

[25]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-attribute Assessment of Road Design Solutions by Using the COPRAS Method , 2007 .

[26]  Darius Migilinskas,et al.  Verbal Analysis of Risk Elements in Construction Contracts , 2006, CDVE.

[27]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Evaluating the sustainability of vilnius city residential areas , 2007 .

[28]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  SELECTION OF THE EFFECTIVE DWELLING HOUSE WALLS BY APPLYING ATTRIBUTES VALUES DETERMINED AT INTERVALS , 2008 .

[29]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-criteria Optimization System for Decision Making in Construction Design and Management , 2009 .

[30]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi‐objective decision‐making for road design , 2008 .

[31]  Francis T. Hartman,et al.  Construction contracts: the cost of mistrust , 2003 .

[32]  Stasys Paulauskas,et al.  The virtualics and strategic self‐management as tools for sustainable development , 2008 .

[33]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  Choice Behaviour in a Computer‐Aided Multiattribute Decision Task , 1997 .

[34]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Model by Applying Grey Numbers , 2009, Informatica.

[35]  Yong-Huang Lin,et al.  Multi-attribute group decision making model under the condition of uncertain information , 2008 .

[36]  Wei Tong Chen,et al.  A method to determine minimum contract bids for incentive highway projects , 2003 .

[37]  Leonas Ustinovichius,et al.  Classification of Real Alternatives and its Application to the Investment Risk in Construction , 2006 .

[38]  I. Ashikhmin,et al.  UniComBOS—Intelligent Decision Support System for multi-criteria comparison and choice , 2005 .

[39]  Leonas Ustinovichius,et al.  Multi‐attribute analysis of investments risk alternatives in construction , 2008 .

[40]  Leonas Ustinovichius,et al.  Classification of the Investment Risk in Construction , 2007, CDVE.

[41]  Jacky K.H. Chung,et al.  A Group Support System for improving value management studies in construction , 2004 .

[42]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  Multicriteria graphical‐analytical evaluation of the financial state of construction enterprises , 2008 .

[43]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A multiple criteria evaluation of multi-family apartment block's maintenance contractors: I—Model for maintenance contractor evaluation and the determination of its selection criteria , 2006 .

[44]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  Evaluating the effect of state aid to business by multicriteria methods , 2008 .

[45]  Leonas Ustinovičius,et al.  Verbal analysis of the investment risk in construction , 2003 .

[46]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Application of a quantitative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM-1) approach to the analysis of investments in construction , 2007 .

[47]  Shengwei Wang,et al.  Intelligent building research: a review , 2005 .

[48]  Mi-Ching Tsai,et al.  Design of a torque observer for detecting abnormal load , 2000 .