Reconstructing tumor evolutionary histories and clone trees in polynomial-time with SubMARine

Tumors contain multiple subpopulations of genetically distinct cancer cells. Reconstructing their evolutionary history can improve our understanding of how cancers develop and respond to treatment. Subclonal reconstruction methods cluster mutations into groups that co-occur within the same subpopulations, estimate the frequency of cells belonging to each subpopulation, and infer the ancestral relationships among the subpopulations by constructing a clone tree. However, often multiple clone trees are consistent with the data and current methods do not efficiently capture this uncertainty; nor can these methods scale to clone trees with a large number of subclonal populations. Here, we formalize the notion of a partial clone tree that defines a subset of the pairwise ancestral relationships in a clone tree, thereby implicitly representing the set of all clone trees that have these defined pairwise relationships. Also, we introduce a special partial clone tree, the Maximally-Constrained Ancestral Reconstruction (MAR), which summarizes all clone trees fitting the input data equally well. Finally, we extend commonly used clone tree validity conditions to apply to partial clone trees and describe SubMARine, a polynomial-time algorithm producing the subMAR, which approximates the MAR and guarantees that its defined relationships are a subset of those present in the MAR. We also extend SubMARine to work with subclonal copy number aberrations and define equivalence constraints for this purpose. In contrast with other clone tree reconstruction methods, SubMARine runs in time and space that scales polynomially in the number of subclones. We show through extensive simulation and a large lung cancer dataset that the subMAR equals the MAR in > 99.9% of cases where only a single clone tree exists and that it is a perfect match to the MAR in most of the other cases. Notably, SubMARine runs in less than 70 seconds on a single thread with less than one Gb of memory on all datasets presented in this paper, including ones with 50 nodes in a clone tree. The freely-available open-source code implementing SubMARine can be downloaded at https://github.com/morrislab/submarine. Author summary Cancer cells accumulate mutations over time and consist of genetically distinct subpopulations. Their evolutionary history (as represented by tumor phylogenies) can be inferred from bulk cancer genome sequencing data. Current tumor phylogeny reconstruction methods have two main issues: they are slow, and they do not efficiently represent uncertainty in the reconstruction. To address these issues, we developed SubMARine, a fast algorithm that summarizes all valid phylogenies in an intuitive format. SubMARine solved all reconstruction problems in this manuscript in less than 70 seconds, orders of magnitude faster than other methods. These reconstruction problems included those with up to 50 subclones; problems that are too large for other algorithms to even attempt. SubMARine achieves these result because, unlike other algorithms, it performs its reconstruction by identifying an upper-bound on the solution set of trees. In the vast majority of cases, this upper bound is tight: when only a single solution exists, SubMARine converges to it > 99.9% of the time; when multiple solutions exist, our algorithm correctly recovers the uncertain relationships in more than 80% of cases. In addition to solving these two major challenges, we introduce some useful new concepts for and open research problems in the field of tumor phylogeny reconstruction. Specifically, we formalize the concept of a partial clone tree which provides a set of constraints on the solution set of clone trees; and provide a complete set of conditions under which a partial clone tree is valid. These conditions guarantee that all trees in the solution set satisfy the constraints implied by the partial clone tree.

[1]  Layla Oesper,et al.  A Consensus Approach to Infer Tumor Evolutionary Histories , 2018, BCB.

[2]  Mohammed El-Kebir,et al.  Implications of non-uniqueness in phylogenetic deconvolution of bulk DNA samples of tumors , 2019, Algorithms for Molecular Biology.

[3]  Mohammed El-Kebir,et al.  On the Non-uniqueness of Solutions to the Perfect Phylogeny Mixture Problem , 2018, RECOMB-CG.

[4]  P. A. Futreal,et al.  Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Joshua F. McMichael,et al.  Clonal evolution in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia revealed by whole genome sequencing , 2011, Nature.

[6]  Franziska Michor,et al.  Myeloma Cell Dynamics in Response to Treatment Supports a Model of Hierarchical Differentiation and Clonal Evolution , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  Mark Cobbold,et al.  Tracking Genomic Cancer Evolution for Precision Medicine: The Lung TRACERx Study , 2014, PLoS biology.

[8]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Reconstruction of clonal trees and tumor composition from multi-sample sequencing data , 2015, Bioinform..

[9]  Ali Bashashati,et al.  Divergent modes of clonal spread and intraperitoneal mixing in high-grade serous ovarian cancer , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[10]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Accurate quantification of copy-number aberrations and whole-genome duplications in multi-sample tumor sequencing data , 2018, Nature Communications.

[11]  Nancy R. Zhang,et al.  Assessing intratumor heterogeneity and tracking longitudinal and spatial clonal evolutionary history by next-generation sequencing , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  S. Blagden,et al.  Harnessing Pandemonium: The Clinical Implications of Tumor Heterogeneity in Ovarian Cancer , 2015, Front. Oncol..

[13]  Sohrab P. Shah,et al.  TITAN: inference of copy number architectures in clonal cell populations from tumor whole-genome sequence data , 2014, Genome research.

[14]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  The Life History of 21 Breast Cancers , 2012, Cell.

[15]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Sequenza: allele-specific copy number and mutation profiles from tumor sequencing data , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[16]  Daniel Q. Naiman,et al.  SubClonal Hierarchy Inference from Somatic Mutations: Automatic Reconstruction of Cancer Evolutionary Trees from Multi-region Next Generation Sequencing , 2015, bioRxiv.

[17]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Tumor phylogeny inference using tree-constrained importance sampling , 2017, Bioinform..

[18]  Jenny Taylor,et al.  Monitoring chronic lymphocytic leukemia progression by whole genome sequencing reveals heterogeneous clonal evolution patterns. , 2012, Blood.

[19]  A. Bouchard-Côté,et al.  PyClone: statistical inference of clonal population structure in cancer , 2014, Nature Methods.

[20]  David C Wedge,et al.  Principles of Reconstructing the Subclonal Architecture of Cancers. , 2017, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine.

[21]  Mohammed El-Kebir,et al.  Summarizing the solution space in tumor phylogeny inference by multiple consensus trees , 2019, Bioinform..

[22]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  The evolutionary history of 2,658 cancers , 2017, Nature.

[23]  Iman Hajirasouliha,et al.  Fast and scalable inference of multi-sample cancer lineages , 2014, Genome Biology.

[24]  R. Karp,et al.  Efficient reconstruction of haplotype structure via perfect phylogeny. , 2002, Journal of bioinformatics and computational biology.

[25]  Shibu Yooseph,et al.  Haplotyping as Perfect Phylogeny: A Direct Approach , 2003, J. Comput. Biol..

[26]  Andrew Menzies,et al.  The patterns and dynamics of genomic instability in metastatic pancreatic cancer , 2010, Nature.

[27]  Eugene W. Myers,et al.  Finding All Spanning Trees of Directed and Undirected Graphs , 1978, SIAM J. Comput..

[28]  Shankar Vembu,et al.  Inferring clonal evolution of tumors from single nucleotide somatic mutations , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[29]  Iman Hajirasouliha,et al.  A combinatorial approach for analyzing intra-tumor heterogeneity from high-throughput sequencing data , 2014, Bioinform..

[30]  Nancy R. Zhang,et al.  Allele-specific copy number profiling by next-generation DNA sequencing , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  THetA: inferring intra-tumor heterogeneity from high-throughput DNA sequencing data , 2013, Genome Biology.

[32]  Junfeng Wang,et al.  Inferring Clonal Composition from Multiple Sections of a Breast Cancer , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  Christopher J. R. Illingworth,et al.  High-Definition Reconstruction of Clonal Composition in Cancer , 2014, Cell reports.

[34]  Nicolai J. Birkbak,et al.  Tracking the Evolution of Non‐Small‐Cell Lung Cancer , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  Shankar Vembu,et al.  PhyloWGS: Reconstructing subclonal composition and evolution from whole-genome sequencing of tumors , 2015, Genome Biology.

[36]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Inferring the Mutational History of a Tumor Using Multi-state Perfect Phylogeny Mixtures. , 2016, Cell systems.

[37]  Nathan M. Wilson,et al.  A community effort to create standards for evaluating tumor subclonal reconstruction , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[38]  Hanlee P. Ji,et al.  Pan-cancer analysis of the extent and consequences of intratumor heterogeneity , 2015, Nature Medicine.

[39]  Y. Kluger,et al.  TrAp: a tree approach for fingerprinting subclonal tumor composition , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[40]  Jack Kuipers,et al.  Single-cell sequencing data reveal widespread recurrence and loss of mutational hits in the life histories of tumors , 2017, Genome research.

[41]  Obi L. Griffith,et al.  SciClone: Inferring Clonal Architecture and Tracking the Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Tumor Evolution , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[42]  Nilgun Donmez,et al.  Clonality inference in multiple tumor samples using phylogeny , 2015, Bioinform..