Generalized DEA: an approach for supporting input/output factor determination in DEA

Purpose The determination of input and output factors is a well-known source of pitfalls when applying data envelopment analysis (DEA). The purpose of this paper is to contribute to overcome the respective problems of input/output factor determination related to factor selection, dual-role factors and undesirable factors. Design/methodology/approach The problems of input/output factor determination are discussed from a goal-oriented perspective, shedding a new light on the role of input/output factors in DEA. This is exemplified by the case of measuring pharmacy stores’ efficiency concerning their goal of customer retention. Findings The findings suggest to applying a generalized DEA (GDEA). The three steps of this approach include the development of a system of objectives, the derivation of corresponding performance criteria as well as the construction of cost and benefit functions. These functions build the basis for GDEA models, of which one is exemplarily described and applied to the customer retention case. Research limitations/implications While traditional DEA implicitly assumes linear cost and benefit functions, GDEA requires to explicitly specifying these functions. In doing so, the approach contributes to solve the problem of factor selection, the problem of dual-role factors and the problem of undesirable factors. Practical implications For determining input/output factors in a consistent and transparent manner, it is recommended to apply GDEA in practical benchmarking studies. Originality/value GDEA integrates well-known concepts of multi-criteria decision making into traditional DEA. The new approach helps to cope with the challenges of input/output factor determination in DEA.

[1]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[2]  Judith A Shutt Balancing the health care scorecard. , 2003, Managed care.

[3]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Data envelopment analysis as a tool for constructing scientometric indicators , 1997, Scientometrics.

[4]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  COOPER-framework: A unified process for non-parametric projects , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Noor Asiah Ramli,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency measurement using data envelopment analysis: A review , 2013 .

[6]  Günter Fandel,et al.  On the performance of universities in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany: Government's redistribution of funds judged using DEA efficiency measures , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Network DEA approach to airports performance assessment considering undesirable outputs , 2013 .

[8]  Darold T. Barnum,et al.  Improving the Efficiency of Distributive and Clinical Services in Hospital Pharmacy , 2009, Journal of Medical Systems.

[9]  Surrey M Walton,et al.  Data envelopment analysis: a method for comparing hospital pharmacy productivity. , 2009, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[10]  Janet M. Wagner,et al.  Stepwise selection of variables in data envelopment analysis: Procedures and managerial perspectives , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Mohsen Afsharian,et al.  The Luenberger indicator and directions of measurement: a bottoms-up approach with an empirical illustration to German savings banks , 2014 .

[14]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Introduction to the theory and application of data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[15]  Minh Hanh Le,et al.  An insight into the specification of the input-output set for DEA-based bank efficiency measurement , 2014 .

[16]  F. B. Vernadat,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .

[17]  Per Joakim Agrell,et al.  ACADEA - A Decision Support System for Faculty Performance Reviews , 2000 .

[18]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Dual-role factors in data envelopment analysis , 2006 .

[19]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[20]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  An application procedure for DEA , 1989 .

[21]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Productivity Growth of Taiwan's Major Domestic Airports in the Presence of Aircraft Noise , 2008 .

[22]  L. White,et al.  Service quality in community pharmacy: an exploration of determinants. , 2012, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[23]  Jill Johnes,et al.  Research Funding and Performance in U.K. University Departments of Economics: A Frontier Analysis. , 1995 .

[24]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[25]  N. C. P. Edirisinghe,et al.  Generalized DEA model of fundamental analysis and its application to portfolio optimization , 2007 .

[26]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: A Foundation Text with Integrated Software , 2001 .

[27]  Fotios Pasiouras,et al.  Assessing Bank Efficiency and Performance with Operational Research and Artificial Intelligence Techniques: A Survey , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  J. Doyle Rational Decision Making , 1998 .

[29]  X. Zhang,et al.  Input/output selection in DEA under expert information, with application to financial markets , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  A. Roberts,et al.  Building capacity to implement cognitive pharmaceutical services: Quantifying the needs of community pharmacies. , 2010, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[31]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives—Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1977 .

[32]  Robert C. Rickards,et al.  Setting benchmarks and evaluating balanced scorecards with data envelopment analysis , 2003 .

[33]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[34]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  DEA and MCDA: Competing or Complementary Approaches? , 1999 .

[35]  Harald Dyckhoff,et al.  Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA) , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Pitfalls and protocols in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  H. Dyckhoff,et al.  Verallgemeinerte DEA-Modelle zur Performanceanalyse , 2010 .

[38]  Somchai Pathomsiri,et al.  Impact of undesirable outputs on the productivity of US airports , 2008 .

[39]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  A survey on bank branch efficiency and performance research with data envelopment analysis , 2013 .