Reducing bias in survival under nonrandom temporary emigration.

Despite intensive monitoring, temporary emigration from the sampling area can induce bias severe enough for managers to discard survival parameter estimates toward the terminus of the times series (terminal bias). Under random temporary emigration, unbiased parameters can be estimated with CJS models. However, unmodeled Markovian temporary emigration causes bias in parameter estimates, and an unobservable state is required to model this type of emigration. The robust design is most flexible when modeling temporary emigration, and partial solutions to mitigate bias have been identified; nonetheless, there are conditions were terminal bias prevails. Long-lived species with high adult survival and highly variable nonrandom temporary emigration present terminal bias in survival estimates, despite being modeled with the robust design and suggested constraints. Because this bias is due to uncertainty about the fate of individuals that are undetected toward the end of the time series, solutions should involve using additional information on survival status or location of these individuals at that time. Using simulation, we evaluated the performance of models that jointly analyze robust design data and an additional source of ancillary data (predictive covariate on temporary emigration, telemetry, dead recovery, or auxiliary resightings) in reducing terminal bias in survival estimates. The auxiliary resighting and predictive covariate models reduced terminal bias the most. Additional telemetry data were effective at reducing terminal bias only when individuals were tracked for a minimum of two years. High adult survival of long-lived species made the joint model with recovery data ineffective at reducing terminal bias because of small-sample bias. The naive constraint model (last and penultimate temporary emigration parameters made equal), was the least efficient, although still able to reduce terminal bias when compared to an unconstrained model. Joint analysis of several sources of data improved parameter estimates and reduced terminal bias. Efforts to incorporate or acquire such data should be considered by researchers and wildlife managers, especially in the years leading up to status assessments of species of interest. Simulation modeling is a very cost-effective method to explore the potential impacts of using different sources of data to produce high-quality demographic data to inform management.

[1]  Lucile Marescot,et al.  Bias in estimation of adult survival and asymptotic population growth rate caused by undetected capture heterogeneity , 2012 .

[2]  R. Cormack Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animals , 1964 .

[3]  Richard J. Barker,et al.  JOINT MODELING OF LIVE-RECAPTURE, TAG-RESIGHT, AND TAG-RECOVERY DATA , 1997 .

[4]  J E Hines,et al.  Combining Band Recovery Data and Pollock's Robust Design to Model Temporary and Permanent Emigration , 2001, Biometrics.

[5]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  The Robustness of Mark-Recapture Methods: A Case Study for the Northern Spotted Owl , 1999 .

[6]  Larissa L Bailey,et al.  Bias, precision, and parameter redundancy in complex multistate models with unobservable states. , 2010, Ecology.

[7]  Hal Caswell,et al.  A GENERAL APPROACH TO TEMPORARY EMIGRATION IN MARK–RECAPTURE ANALYSIS , 2002 .

[8]  William L. Kendall,et al.  Coping with unobservable and mis-classified states in capture-recapture studies , 2004 .

[9]  Paul F. Doherty,et al.  Survival of Resident Neotropical Birds: Considerations for Sampling and Analysis Based on 20 Years of Bird-Banding Efforts in Mexico , 2012 .

[10]  Roger Pradel,et al.  ESTIMATING SURVIVAL AND TEMPORARY EMIGRATION IN THE MULTISTATE CAPTURE–RECAPTURE FRAMEWORK , 2004 .

[11]  G. Seber A NOTE ON THE MULTIPLE-RECAPTURE CENSUS. , 1965, Biometrika.

[12]  K. Pollock A Capture-Recapture Design Robust to Unequal Probability of Capture , 1982 .

[13]  K. Burnham,et al.  Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals , 1999 .

[14]  Carol A. Sanders-Reed,et al.  A core stochastic population projection model for Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris) , 2007 .

[15]  J. Nichols,et al.  Climate Change, Uncertainty, and Natural Resource Management , 2011 .

[16]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Larissa L. Bailey,et al.  Estimating survival and breeding probability for pond-breeding amphibians: a modified robust design , 2004 .

[18]  Roger Pradel,et al.  ESTIMATES OF ANNUAL SURVIVAL PROBABILITIES FOR ADULT FLORIDA MANATEES (TRICHECHUS MANATUS LATIROSTRIS) , 1998 .

[19]  Sarah J. Converse,et al.  Multistate Models for Estimation of Survival and Reproduction in the Grey-Headed Albatross (Thalassarche Chrysostoma) , 2009 .

[20]  W L Kendall,et al.  Using Open Robust Design Models to Estimate Temporary Emigration from Capture—Recapture Data , 2001, Biometrics.

[21]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  Design and analysis methods for fish survival experiments based on release-recapture , 1989 .

[22]  T. O'Shea,et al.  Seasonal movements, migratory behavior, and site fidelity of West Indian manatees along the Atlantic coast of the United States , 2003 .

[23]  Richard J. Barker,et al.  Combining dead recovery, auxiliary observations and robust design data to estimate demographic parameters from marked individuals , 2013 .

[24]  James E. Hines,et al.  ESTIMATING TEMPORARY EMIGRATION USING CAPTURE-RECAPTURE DATA WITH POLLOCK'S ROBUST DESIGN , 1997 .

[25]  J. Rotella,et al.  Variability in temporary emigration rates of individually marked female Weddell seals prior to first reproduction , 2012, Oecologia.

[26]  James E. Hines,et al.  Simultaneous use of mark-recapture and radiotelemetry to estimate survival, movement, and capture rates , 2000 .

[27]  Alistair J. Hobday,et al.  Automated acoustic tracking of aquatic animals: scales, design and deployment of listening station arrays , 2006 .

[28]  G. Jolly EXPLICIT ESTIMATES FROM CAPTURE-RECAPTURE DATA WITH BOTH DEATH AND IMMIGRATION-STOCHASTIC MODEL. , 1965, Biometrika.

[29]  K. Ullas Karanth,et al.  Application of photographic capture–recapture modelling to estimate demographic parameters for male Asian elephants , 2007 .

[30]  C. Langtimm,et al.  SURVIVAL ESTIMATES FOR FLORIDA MANATEES FROM THE PHOTO‐IDENTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS , 2004 .

[31]  P. Hammond,et al.  Estimating survival and abundance in a bottlenose dolphin population taking into account transience and temporary emigration , 2009 .

[32]  W. Kendall,et al.  A General Model for the Analysis of Mark‐Resight, Mark‐Recapture, and Band‐Recovery Data under Tag Loss , 2004, Biometrics.

[33]  Daniel Stanwood Hartman,et al.  Ecology and behavior of the Manatee (Trichechus manatus) in Florida , 1979 .

[34]  J. Provancha,et al.  Long-term trends in abundance and distribution of manatees (Trichechus manatus) in the northern Banana river, Brevard county, Florida , 1988 .

[35]  C. Schwarz,et al.  ESTIMATING TEMPORARY MIGRATION USING THE ROBUST DESIGN , 1997 .

[36]  J. Grand,et al.  Transient population dynamics:relations to life history and initial population state , 2005 .