UPSTREAM VOLATILITY IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN: THE MACHINE TOOL INDUSTRY AS A CASE STUDY

Cyclicality is a well-known and accepted fact of life in market-driven economies. Less well known or understood, however, is the phenomenon of amplification as one looks “upstream” in the industrial supply chain. We examine the amplification phenomenon and its implications through the lens of one upstream industry that is notorious for the intensity of the business cycles it faces: the machine tool industry. Amplification of demand volatility in capital equipment supply chains, e.g., machine tools, is particularly large relative to that seen in distribution and component parts supply chains. We present a system dynamics simulation model to capture demand volatility amplification in capital supply chains. We explore the lead-time, inventory, production, productivity, and staffing implications of these dynamic forces. Several results stand out. First, volatility hurts productivity and lowers average worker experience. Second, even though machine tool builders can do little to reduce the volatility in their order streams through choice of forecast rule, a smoother forecasting policy will lead companies to retain more of their skilled work force. This retention of skilled employees is often cited as one of the advantages that European and Japanese companies have had relative to their U.S. competitors. Our results suggest some insights for supply chain design and management: downstream customers can do a great deal to reduce the volatility for upstream suppliers through their choice of order forecast rule. In particular, companies that use smoother forecasting policies tend to impose less of their own volatility upon their supply base and may consequently enjoy system-wide cost reduction.

[1]  Paul A. Samuelson,et al.  Interactions Between The Multiplier Analysis And The Principle Of Acceleration , 1939 .

[2]  C. C. Holt,et al.  Planning Production, Inventories, and Work Force. , 1962 .

[3]  J. P. Hofer,et al.  Problems in industrial dynamics , 1966 .

[4]  H. Popper,et al.  The goal. , 1967, Journal of the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York.

[5]  M. Powell A method for nonlinear constraints in minimization problems , 1969 .

[6]  P. Senge The system dynamics national model investment function : a comparison to the neoclassical investment function. , 1978 .

[7]  J. Lyneis Corporate planning and policy design : a system dynamics approach , 1980 .

[8]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling with DYNAMO , 1981 .

[9]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: Results of a forecasting competition , 1982 .

[10]  J. Sterman A behavioral model of the economic long wave , 1985 .

[11]  John D. W. Morecroft,et al.  Rationality in the Analysis of Behavioral Simulation Models , 1985 .

[12]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[13]  M. Dertouzos,et al.  Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge , 1989 .

[14]  J. Sterman Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making , 1989 .

[15]  P. Senge THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[16]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[17]  Albert M. Bottoms,et al.  Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge , 1990 .

[18]  C. Chatfield,et al.  The M2-competition: A real-time judgmentally based forecasting study , 1993 .

[19]  Rogelio Oliva Pue,et al.  A dynamic theory of service delivery : implications for managing service quality , 1996 .

[20]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  The International Center for Research on the Management of Technology Is the Make-buy Decision Process a Core Competence? , 2022 .

[21]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[22]  L. LeeHau,et al.  Information Distortion in a Supply Chain , 1997 .

[23]  The effects of business cycles on capital supplier productivity and technological capability , 1997 .

[24]  Geoffrey Goodrich Parker Contracting for employee and supplier capability development , 1998 .

[25]  Morris A. Cohen,et al.  The Stabilizing Effect of Inventory in Supply Chains , 1998, Oper. Res..

[26]  Stephen C. Graves,et al.  A Single-Item Inventory Model for a Nonstationary Demand Process , 1999, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[27]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Business Cycles and Productivity in Capital Equipment Supply Chains , 1999 .

[28]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..