Testing the acoustic adaptation hypothesis with vocalizations from three mongoose species
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. Manser | M. Cant | A. Radford | Maxime Garcia | Stuart K. Watson | S. Kyabulima | Aitana Garcia Arasco
[1] A. Radford,et al. Strongly bonded individuals prefer to forage together in cooperatively breeding dwarf mongoose groups , 2021, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[2] Braelei Hardt,et al. Can you hear me now? A review of signal transmission and experimental evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis , 2020, Bioacoustics.
[3] M. Manser,et al. Bound for Specific Sounds: Vocal Predisposition in Animal Communication , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[4] B. Kempenaers,et al. A global analysis of song frequency in passerines provides no support for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis but suggests a role for sexual selection , 2020, bioRxiv.
[5] Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching , 2018, Animal Behaviour.
[6] R. Márquez,et al. How the environment shapes animal signals: a test of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis in frogs , 2018, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[7] Casper W. Berg,et al. glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling , 2017, R J..
[8] W. Fitch,et al. Acoustic allometry revisited: morphological determinants of fundamental frequency in primate vocal production , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[9] Marta B. Manser,et al. Group cohesion in foraging meerkats: follow the moving ‘vocal hot spot’ , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.
[10] M. Manser,et al. Discrete call types referring to predation risk enhance the efficiency of the meerkat sentinel system , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[11] Marcelo Araya-Salas,et al. warbleR: an r package to streamline analysis of animal acoustic signals , 2017 .
[12] D. Mennill,et al. A test of the Acoustic Adaptation Hypothesis in three types of tropical forest: degradation of male and female Rufous-and-white Wren songs , 2017 .
[13] M. Cant,et al. Variable ecological conditions promote male helping by changing banded mongoose group composition , 2016, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.
[14] Christoph Adami,et al. What is information?† , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[15] Peter Møller Juhl,et al. Fundamentals of General Linear Acoustics , 2013 .
[16] A. Radford,et al. Call of duty? Variation in use of the watchman's song by sentinel dwarf mongooses, Helogale parvula , 2013, Animal Behaviour.
[17] D. A. Jansen. Vocal communication in the banded mongoose (Mungos mungo) , 2013 .
[18] W. Fitch,et al. Estimating the Active Space of Male Koala Bellows: Propagation of Cues to Size and Identity in a Eucalyptus Forest , 2012, PloS one.
[19] L. Sneddon,et al. Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching , 2012, Animal Behaviour.
[20] E. Briefer,et al. Indicators of Age, Body Size and Sex in Goat Kid Calls Revealed Using the Source–Filter Theory , 2011 .
[21] Paul Roe,et al. Koala bellows and their association with the spatial dynamics of free-ranging koalas , 2011 .
[22] M. Peters,et al. Long‐distance call evolution in the Felidae: effects of body weight, habitat, and phylogeny , 2010 .
[23] N. Mathevon,et al. Song Degradation during Propagation: Importance of Song Post for the Wren Troglodytes troglodytes , 2010 .
[24] D. Reby,et al. The contribution of source–filter theory to mammal vocal communication research , 2010 .
[25] T. Price,et al. Community convergence in bird song , 2010, Evolutionary Ecology.
[26] S. Derégnaucourt,et al. The Genetic Basis of Zebra Finch Vocalizations , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[27] J. Fischer,et al. THE “ACOUSTIC ADAPTATION HYPOTHESIS”—A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE FROM BIRDS, ANURANS AND MAMMALS , 2009 .
[28] Thierry Aubin,et al. SEEWAVE, A FREE MODULAR TOOL FOR SOUND ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS , 2008 .
[29] M. Manser,et al. Latrine distribution and patterns of use by wild meerkats: implications for territory and mate defence , 2007, Animal Behaviour.
[30] Torben Dabelsteen,et al. Rainforests as concert halls for birds: are reverberations improving sound transmission of long song elements? , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] Hans Slabbekoorn,et al. Habitat-dependent ambient noise: consistent spectral profiles in two African forest types. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] P. Gaubert,et al. Molecular systematics and origin of sociality in mongooses (Herpestidae, Carnivora). , 2004, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[33] D. Reby,et al. Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags , 2003, Animal Behaviour.
[34] Robert J. Scholes,et al. Trends in savanna structure and composition along an aridity gradient in the Kalahari , 2002 .
[35] M. Manser,et al. The acoustic structure of suricates' alarm calls varies with predator type and the level of response urgency , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[36] Marc Naguib,et al. Estimating the distance to a source of sound: mechanisms and adaptations for long-range communication , 2001, Animal Behaviour.
[37] M. Oelze,et al. Measurement of attenuation and speed of sound in soils for the purposes of imaging buried objects , 2001 .
[38] Michael A. Cant,et al. Social control of reproduction in banded mongooses , 2000, Animal Behaviour.
[39] T. Clutton‐Brock,et al. Reproduction and survival of suricates (Suricata suricatta) in the southern Kalahari , 1999 .
[40] Janice C. Daniel,et al. A test of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis in four species of marmots , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[41] T. Clutton‐Brock,et al. Costs of cooperative behaviour in suricates (Suricata suricatta) , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[42] P A Bednekoff,et al. Mutualism Among Safe, Selfish Sentinels: A Dynamic Game , 1997, The American Naturalist.
[43] Paul R. Martin,et al. Song transmission and auditory perception of distance in wood warblers (Parulinae) , 1997, Animal Behaviour.
[44] D. Macdonald,et al. Diet and foraging behaviour of group‐living meerkats, Suricata suricatta, in the southern Kalahari , 1996 .
[45] Charles H. Brown,et al. Old world monkey vocalizations: adaptation to the local habitat? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[46] T. G. Forrest. From Sender to Receiver: Propagation and Environmental Effects on Acoustic Signals , 1994 .
[47] E. T. Segura,et al. Dialect Differences in the Song of Zonotrichia capensis in the Southern Pampas: A Test of the Acoustic Adaptation Hypothesis , 1994 .
[48] R. H. Wiley,et al. Reverberations and Amplitude Fluctuations in the Propagation of Sound in a Forest: Implications for Animal Communication , 1980, The American Naturalist.
[49] J. Krebs,et al. Geographical Variation in the Song of the Great Tit (Parus major) in Relation to Ecological Factors , 1979 .
[50] R. Wiley,et al. Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations , 1978, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[51] P. Marler,et al. Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization , 1977, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[52] P. Marler,et al. Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization , 1977, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[53] E. Morton. On the Occurrence and Significance of Motivation-Structural Rules in Some Bird and Mammal Sounds , 1977, The American Naturalist.
[54] E. Morton. Ecological Sources of Selection on Avian Sounds , 1975, The American Naturalist.
[55] C. Harris. Absorption of Sound in Air versus Humidity and Temperature , 1966 .
[56] Uno Ingard,et al. A Review of the Influence of Meteorological Conditions on Sound Propagation , 1953 .
[57] Ingrid Holzmann,et al. Reduced geographic variation in roars in different habitats rejects the acoustic adaptation hypothesis in the black‐and‐gold howler monkey ( Alouatta caraya ) , 2019, Ethology.
[58] Katie Collier. Social Mongoose Vocal Communication: Insights into the Emergence of Linguistic Combinatoriality , 2017 .
[59] S. Barnett,et al. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A : Mathematical , 2017 .
[60] N. Hazel. Banded mongooses: Demography, life history, and social behavior , 2016 .
[61] M. Manser,et al. Vocal Complexity in Meerkats and Other Mongoose Species , 2014 .
[62] Katherine E. Gentry,et al. Sources of background noise and their influence on vertebrate acoustic communication , 2013 .
[63] J. Bradbury,et al. Principles of animal communication, 2nd ed. , 2011 .
[64] H. Brumm,et al. Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .
[65] C. G. Sibley. ECOLOGICAL SOURCES OF SELECTION ON AVIAN SOUNDS , 2004 .
[66] I. N. Ermolov. Measurement of attenuation , 1999 .
[67] E. Date,et al. Sound Transmission: a Basis for Dialects in Birdsong? , 1993 .
[68] Charles H. Brown,et al. Habitat acoustics and primate communication , 1986, American journal of primatology.
[69] B. Zimmerman. A COMPARISON OF STRUCTURAL FEATURES OF CALLS OF OPEN AND FOREST HABITAT FROG SPECIES IN THE CENTRAL AMAZON , 1983 .
[70] Eugene S. Morton,et al. 6 – Grading, Discreteness, Redundancy, and Motivation-Structural Rules , 1982 .
[71] A. Michelsen,et al. Absorption of acoustic energy by plant leaves , 1981 .
[72] D. Aylor. NOISE REDUCTION BY VEGETATION AND GROUND , 1972 .