Testing the acoustic adaptation hypothesis with vocalizations from three mongoose species

[1]  A. Radford,et al.  Strongly bonded individuals prefer to forage together in cooperatively breeding dwarf mongoose groups , 2021, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  Braelei Hardt,et al.  Can you hear me now? A review of signal transmission and experimental evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis , 2020, Bioacoustics.

[3]  M. Manser,et al.  Bound for Specific Sounds: Vocal Predisposition in Animal Communication , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  A global analysis of song frequency in passerines provides no support for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis but suggests a role for sexual selection , 2020, bioRxiv.

[5]  Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching , 2018, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  R. Márquez,et al.  How the environment shapes animal signals: a test of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis in frogs , 2018, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[7]  Casper W. Berg,et al.  glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling , 2017, R J..

[8]  W. Fitch,et al.  Acoustic allometry revisited: morphological determinants of fundamental frequency in primate vocal production , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Marta B. Manser,et al.  Group cohesion in foraging meerkats: follow the moving ‘vocal hot spot’ , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[10]  M. Manser,et al.  Discrete call types referring to predation risk enhance the efficiency of the meerkat sentinel system , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Marcelo Araya-Salas,et al.  warbleR: an r package to streamline analysis of animal acoustic signals , 2017 .

[12]  D. Mennill,et al.  A test of the Acoustic Adaptation Hypothesis in three types of tropical forest: degradation of male and female Rufous-and-white Wren songs , 2017 .

[13]  M. Cant,et al.  Variable ecological conditions promote male helping by changing banded mongoose group composition , 2016, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[14]  Christoph Adami,et al.  What is information?† , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[15]  Peter Møller Juhl,et al.  Fundamentals of General Linear Acoustics , 2013 .

[16]  A. Radford,et al.  Call of duty? Variation in use of the watchman's song by sentinel dwarf mongooses, Helogale parvula , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  D. A. Jansen.  Vocal communication in the banded mongoose (Mungos mungo) , 2013 .

[18]  W. Fitch,et al.  Estimating the Active Space of Male Koala Bellows: Propagation of Cues to Size and Identity in a Eucalyptus Forest , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  L. Sneddon,et al.  Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  E. Briefer,et al.  Indicators of Age, Body Size and Sex in Goat Kid Calls Revealed Using the Source–Filter Theory , 2011 .

[21]  Paul Roe,et al.  Koala bellows and their association with the spatial dynamics of free-ranging koalas , 2011 .

[22]  M. Peters,et al.  Long‐distance call evolution in the Felidae: effects of body weight, habitat, and phylogeny , 2010 .

[23]  N. Mathevon,et al.  Song Degradation during Propagation: Importance of Song Post for the Wren Troglodytes troglodytes , 2010 .

[24]  D. Reby,et al.  The contribution of source–filter theory to mammal vocal communication research , 2010 .

[25]  T. Price,et al.  Community convergence in bird song , 2010, Evolutionary Ecology.

[26]  S. Derégnaucourt,et al.  The Genetic Basis of Zebra Finch Vocalizations , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  J. Fischer,et al.  THE “ACOUSTIC ADAPTATION HYPOTHESIS”—A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE FROM BIRDS, ANURANS AND MAMMALS , 2009 .

[28]  Thierry Aubin,et al.  SEEWAVE, A FREE MODULAR TOOL FOR SOUND ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS , 2008 .

[29]  M. Manser,et al.  Latrine distribution and patterns of use by wild meerkats: implications for territory and mate defence , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  Rainforests as concert halls for birds: are reverberations improving sound transmission of long song elements? , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Hans Slabbekoorn,et al.  Habitat-dependent ambient noise: consistent spectral profiles in two African forest types. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  P. Gaubert,et al.  Molecular systematics and origin of sociality in mongooses (Herpestidae, Carnivora). , 2004, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[33]  D. Reby,et al.  Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  Robert J. Scholes,et al.  Trends in savanna structure and composition along an aridity gradient in the Kalahari , 2002 .

[35]  M. Manser,et al.  The acoustic structure of suricates' alarm calls varies with predator type and the level of response urgency , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Estimating the distance to a source of sound: mechanisms and adaptations for long-range communication , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  M. Oelze,et al.  Measurement of attenuation and speed of sound in soils for the purposes of imaging buried objects , 2001 .

[38]  Michael A. Cant,et al.  Social control of reproduction in banded mongooses , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Reproduction and survival of suricates (Suricata suricatta) in the southern Kalahari , 1999 .

[40]  Janice C. Daniel,et al.  A test of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis in four species of marmots , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Costs of cooperative behaviour in suricates (Suricata suricatta) , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  P A Bednekoff,et al.  Mutualism Among Safe, Selfish Sentinels: A Dynamic Game , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[43]  Paul R. Martin,et al.  Song transmission and auditory perception of distance in wood warblers (Parulinae) , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Diet and foraging behaviour of group‐living meerkats, Suricata suricatta, in the southern Kalahari , 1996 .

[45]  Charles H. Brown,et al.  Old world monkey vocalizations: adaptation to the local habitat? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  T. G. Forrest.  From Sender to Receiver: Propagation and Environmental Effects on Acoustic Signals , 1994 .

[47]  E. T. Segura,et al.  Dialect Differences in the Song of Zonotrichia capensis in the Southern Pampas: A Test of the Acoustic Adaptation Hypothesis , 1994 .

[48]  R. H. Wiley,et al.  Reverberations and Amplitude Fluctuations in the Propagation of Sound in a Forest: Implications for Animal Communication , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[49]  J. Krebs,et al.  Geographical Variation in the Song of the Great Tit (Parus major) in Relation to Ecological Factors , 1979 .

[50]  R. Wiley,et al.  Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations , 1978, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[51]  P. Marler,et al.  Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization , 1977, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[52]  P. Marler,et al.  Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization , 1977, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[53]  E. Morton.  On the Occurrence and Significance of Motivation-Structural Rules in Some Bird and Mammal Sounds , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[54]  E. Morton.  Ecological Sources of Selection on Avian Sounds , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[55]  C. Harris.  Absorption of Sound in Air versus Humidity and Temperature , 1966 .

[56]  Uno Ingard,et al.  A Review of the Influence of Meteorological Conditions on Sound Propagation , 1953 .

[57]  Ingrid Holzmann,et al.  Reduced geographic variation in roars in different habitats rejects the acoustic adaptation hypothesis in the black‐and‐gold howler monkey ( Alouatta caraya ) , 2019, Ethology.

[58]  Katie Collier.  Social Mongoose Vocal Communication: Insights into the Emergence of Linguistic Combinatoriality , 2017 .

[59]  S. Barnett,et al.  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A : Mathematical , 2017 .

[60]  N. Hazel.  Banded mongooses: Demography, life history, and social behavior , 2016 .

[61]  M. Manser,et al.  Vocal Complexity in Meerkats and Other Mongoose Species , 2014 .

[62]  Katherine E. Gentry,et al.  Sources of background noise and their influence on vertebrate acoustic communication , 2013 .

[63]  J. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of animal communication, 2nd ed. , 2011 .

[64]  H. Brumm,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .

[65]  C. G. Sibley.  ECOLOGICAL SOURCES OF SELECTION ON AVIAN SOUNDS , 2004 .

[66]  I. N. Ermolov.  Measurement of attenuation , 1999 .

[67]  E. Date,et al.  Sound Transmission: a Basis for Dialects in Birdsong? , 1993 .

[68]  Charles H. Brown,et al.  Habitat acoustics and primate communication , 1986, American journal of primatology.

[69]  B. Zimmerman.  A COMPARISON OF STRUCTURAL FEATURES OF CALLS OF OPEN AND FOREST HABITAT FROG SPECIES IN THE CENTRAL AMAZON , 1983 .

[70]  Eugene S. Morton,et al.  6 – Grading, Discreteness, Redundancy, and Motivation-Structural Rules , 1982 .

[71]  A. Michelsen,et al.  Absorption of acoustic energy by plant leaves , 1981 .

[72]  D. Aylor.  NOISE REDUCTION BY VEGETATION AND GROUND , 1972 .