Pairwise mixture model for unmixing partial volume effect in multi-voxel MR spectroscopy of brain tumour patients

Multi-Voxel Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MV-MRS) provides an important and insightful technique for the examination of the chemical composition of brain tissue, making it an attractive medical imaging modality for the examination of brain tumours. MRS, however, is affected by the issue of the Partial Volume Effect (PVE), where the signals of multiple tissue types can be found within a single voxel and provides an obstacle to the interpretation of the data. The PVE results from the low resolution achieved in MV-MRS images relating to the signal to noise ratio (SNR). To counteract PVE, this paper proposes a novel Pairwise Mixture Model (PMM), that extends a recently reported Signal Mixture Model (SMM) for representing the MV-MRS signal as normal, low or high grade tissue types. Inspired by Conditional Random Field (CRF) and its continuous variant the PMM incorporates the surrounding voxel neighbourhood into an optimisation problem, the solution of which provides an estimation to a set of coefficients. The values of the estimated coefficients represents the amount of each tissue type (normal, low or high) found within a voxel. These coefficients can then be visualised as a nosological rendering using a coloured grid representing the MV-MRS image overlaid on top of a structural image, such as a Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI). Experimental results show an accuracy of 92.69% in classifying patient tumours as either low or high grade compared against the histopathology for each patient. Compared to 91.96% achieved by the SMM, the proposed PMM method demonstrates the importance of incorporating spatial coherence into the estimation as well as its potential clinical usage.

[1]  R Grant,et al.  Overview: brain tumour diagnosis and management/Royal College of Physicians guidelines , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[2]  Lutgarde M. C. Buydens,et al.  Application of independent component analysis to 1H MR spectroscopic imaging exams of brain tumours , 2005 .

[3]  J. LEE,et al.  Nuclear Magnetic Resonance , 1968, Nature.

[4]  Carles Arús,et al.  Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) of human brain tumours: assessment of differences between tumour types and its applicability in brain tumour categorization , 2003, European Radiology.

[5]  Yu Guo,et al.  A Sparse Representation Method for Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Quantification , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  R. Edwards,et al.  Improving Outcomes for People with Brain and Other CNS Tumours: Analysis of the Potential Economic Impact of the Guidance. , 2006 .

[7]  Guang Yang,et al.  Manifold Learning in MR spectroscopy using nonlinear dimensionality reduction and unsupervised clustering , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  S Van Huffel,et al.  Fast nosologic imaging of the brain. , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[9]  Olga Veksler,et al.  Graph cut with ordering constraints on labels and its applications , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[10]  M. Law,et al.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the brain: review of metabolites and clinical applications. , 2009, Clinical radiology.

[11]  Felix Raschke,et al.  1H 2D MRSI tissue type analysis of gliomas , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  J R Griffiths,et al.  Pattern recognition of MRSI data shows regions of glioma growth that agree with DTI markers of brain tumor infiltration , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Guido Gerig,et al.  A brain tumor segmentation framework based on outlier detection , 2004, Medical Image Anal..

[14]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data , 2001, ICML.

[15]  R R Edelman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (1). , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Alessandro Olivi,et al.  Independent predictors of morbidity after image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy: a risk assessment of 270 cases. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[17]  P. Sundgren,et al.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy. , 2005, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[18]  Paulo J. G. Lisboa,et al.  Non-negative matrix factorisation methods for the spectral decomposition of MRS data from human brain tumours , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[19]  Paulo J. G. Lisboa,et al.  A Novel Semi-Supervised Methodology for Extracting Tumor Type-Specific MRS Sources in Human Brain Data , 2013, PloS one.

[20]  Guang Yang,et al.  NONLINEAR LAPLACIAN EIGENMAPS DIMENSION REDUCTION OF IN-VIVO MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPIC IMAGING ANALYSIS , 2012 .

[21]  Guang Yang,et al.  Supervised partial volume effect unmixing for brain tumor characterization using multi-voxel MR spectroscopic imaging , 2016, 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[22]  T. Ernst,et al.  Elimination of artifacts in short echo time 1H MR spectroscopy of the frontal lobe , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  A R Tate,et al.  Towards a method for automated classification of 1H MRS spectra from brain tumours , 1998, NMR in biomedicine.

[24]  Jason D. Wright,et al.  Complications Following Stereotactic Needle Biopsy of Intracranial Tumors. , 2015, World neurosurgery.

[25]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Nosologic imaging of the brain: segmentation and classification using MRI and MRSI , 2009, NMR in biomedicine.

[26]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Sylvie Grand,et al.  A new approach for analyzing proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic images of brain tumors: nosologic images , 2000, Nature Medicine.

[28]  Franklyn A Howe,et al.  1H MR spectroscopy of brain tumours and masses , 2003, NMR in biomedicine.

[29]  I. Marshall,et al.  Reproducibility of metabolite peak areas in 1H MRS of brain. , 1996, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[30]  Stefan Bauer,et al.  Fully Automatic Segmentation of Brain Tumor Images Using Support Vector Machine Classification in Combination with Hierarchical Conditional Random Field Regularization , 2011, MICCAI.

[31]  Guang Yang,et al.  Classification of brain tumour 1H MR spectra: Extracting features by metabolite quantification or nonlinear manifold learning? , 2014, 2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).