Technical efficiency of thermoelectric power plants

This paper analyses the technical efficiency of Portuguese thermoelectric power generating plants with a two-stage procedure. In the first stage, the plants' relative technical efficiency is estimated with DEA (data envelopment analysis) to establish which plants perform most efficiently. These plants could serve as peers to help improve performance of the least efficient plants. The paper ranks these plants according to their relative efficiency for the period 1996-2004. In a second stage, the Simar and Wilson [Simar, L., Wilson, P.W., 2007. Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics 136, 1-34] bootstrapped procedure is adopted to estimate the efficiency drivers. Economic implications arising from the study are considered.

[1]  B. Efron Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 1979 .

[2]  David Kendrick,et al.  GAMS, a user's guide , 1988, SGNM.

[3]  E. Wailand Bessent,et al.  Determining the Comparative Efficiency of Schools through Data Envelopment Analysis , 1980 .

[4]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[5]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[6]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  A Benchmarking Method for Business-Process Reengineering and Improvement , 2000 .

[7]  S. Malmquist Index numbers and indifference surfaces , 1953 .

[8]  Marcus J. Chambers,et al.  Frequency Domain Gaussian Estimation of Temporally Aggregated Cointegrated Systems , 2004 .

[9]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  An application procedure for DEA , 1989 .

[10]  W. Briec A Graph-Type Extension of Farrell Technical Efficiency Measure , 1997 .

[11]  Dominique Deprins,et al.  Measuring Labor-Efficiency in Post Offices , 2006 .

[12]  R. Färe,et al.  Benefit and Distance Functions , 1996 .

[13]  R. Raab,et al.  Identifying Subareas that Comprise a Greater Metropolitan Area: The Criterion of County Relative Efficiency , 2002 .

[14]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Evaluation of Educational Program Proposals by Means of DEA , 1983 .

[15]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Applied data envelopment analysis , 1991 .

[16]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[17]  H. Demsetz Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy , 1973, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[18]  P. Pestieau,et al.  Public Enterprise Economics.@@@The Performance of Public Enterprises: Concepts and Measurement. , 1987 .

[19]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions , 1985 .

[20]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[21]  A. Charnes,et al.  Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks , 1990 .

[22]  Barton A. Smith,et al.  Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas , 1986 .

[23]  C. Barros Efficiency analysis of hydroelectric generating plants : A case study for Portugal , 2008 .

[24]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[25]  Michael G. Pollitt,et al.  The 2001-3 electricity distribution price control review in the Netherlands: regulatory process and consumer welfare , 2007 .

[26]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  International benchmarking and regulation: an application to European electricity distribution utilities , 2003 .

[27]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Estimating and bootstrapping Malmquist indices , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Paul H. L. Nillesen,et al.  Strategic behaviour under regulatory benchmarking , 2004 .

[29]  B. Park,et al.  A NOTE ON THE CONVERGENCE OF NONPARAMETRIC DEA ESTIMATORS FOR PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY SCORES , 1998, Econometric Theory.

[30]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: The State of the Art , 1999 .

[31]  D. Luenberger Benefit functions and duality , 1992 .

[32]  Shunsuke Managi,et al.  Regulatory reforms and productivity : an empirical analysis of the Japanese electricity industry , 2008 .

[33]  Michael G. Pollitt,et al.  Ownership and Performance in Electric Utilities , 1998 .

[34]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[35]  Dek Terrell,et al.  Measuring Potential Efficiency Gains from Deregulation of Electricity Generation: A Bayesian Approach , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[36]  C. Barros,et al.  Technical efficiency of African hotels , 2008 .

[37]  R. Robert Russell,et al.  Continuity of measures of technical efficiency , 1990 .

[38]  L. Simar,et al.  Nonparametric efficiency analysis: a multivariate conditional quantile approach , 2007 .

[39]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[40]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: A Foundation Text with Integrated Software , 2001 .

[41]  Carlos Pestana Barros,et al.  The determinants of cost efficiency of hydroelectric generating plants: A random frontier approach , 2007 .

[42]  R. R. Russell,et al.  Distance Functions in Consumer and Producer Theory , 1998 .

[43]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[44]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[45]  A. Charnes,et al.  A multiplicative model for efficiency analysis , 1982 .

[46]  Subal C. Kumbhakar,et al.  Production Frontiers and Panel Data: An Application to U.S. Class 1 Railroads , 1987 .

[47]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming , 1990 .