The time course of natural scene perception with reduced attention.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Neil A. Macmillan,et al. Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .
[2] Arnold W. M. Smeulders,et al. Brain responses strongly correlate with Weibull image statistics when processing natural images. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[3] D J Field,et al. Local Contrast in Natural Images: Normalisation and Coding Efficiency , 2000, Perception.
[4] J. Marshall,et al. Hemispheric asymmetries in global⧹local processing are modulated by perceptual salience , 1998, Neuropsychologia.
[5] G. Woodman,et al. Event-related potential studies of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[6] Kendrick N. Kay,et al. Attention Reduces Spatial Uncertainty in Human Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2015, Current Biology.
[7] Bruce C Hansen,et al. Different spatial frequency bands selectively signal for natural image statistics in the early visual system. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.
[8] S. Dakin,et al. Context influences contour integration. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[9] Steven W. Zucker,et al. Local Scale Control for Edge Detection and Blur Estimation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..
[10] R. Rosenholtz,et al. A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[11] Ana B. Chica,et al. Attentional Routes to Conscious Perception , 2012, Front. Psychology.
[12] Victor A. F. Lamme,et al. The influence of inattention on the neural correlates of scene segmentation , 2006, Brain Research.
[13] Eero P. Simoncelli,et al. Metamers of the ventral stream , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.
[14] Gidon Felsen,et al. A natural approach to studying vision , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.
[15] S. Thorpe,et al. Rapid categorization of foveal and extrafoveal natural images: Associated ERPs and effects of lateralization , 2005, Brain and Cognition.
[16] M. Boucart,et al. Scene perception in age-related macular degeneration. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[17] M. Potter. Meaning in visual search. , 1975, Science.
[18] Victor A. F. Lamme,et al. Low-level contrast statistics are diagnostic of invariance of natural textures , 2012, Front. Comput. Neurosci..
[19] Leslie G. Ungerleider. Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .
[20] J. Rieger,et al. BOLD responses in human V1 to local structure in natural scenes: Implications for theories of visual coding. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[21] G. Woodman,et al. Neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.
[22] F. Perrin,et al. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[23] A. Treisman,et al. Perception of objects in natural scenes: is it really attention free? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[24] A. Woods,et al. Context Modulates the Contribution of Time and Space in Causal Inference , 2012, Front. Psychology.
[25] Krista A. Ehinger,et al. Rethinking the Role of Top-Down Attention in Vision: Effects Attributable to a Lossy Representation in Peripheral Vision , 2011, Front. Psychology.
[26] Bruce C Hansen,et al. The role of higher order image statistics in masking scene gist recognition , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[27] J L Gallant,et al. Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. , 2000, Science.
[28] Aude Oliva,et al. Spatial ensemble statistics are efficient codes that can be represented with reduced attention , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[29] Michèle Fabre-Thorpe,et al. Interaction of top-down and bottom-up processing in the fast visual analysis of natural scenes. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[30] G. Mangun,et al. Neural Mechanisms of Global and Local Processing: A Combined PET and ERP Study , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[31] A. Keil,et al. The influence of response competition on cerebral asymmetries for processing hierarchical stimuli revealed by ERP recordings , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.
[32] A. Oliva,et al. Coarse Blobs or Fine Edges? Evidence That Information Diagnosticity Changes the Perception of Complex Visual Stimuli , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.
[33] V. Lamme,et al. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.
[34] Bruno A Olshausen,et al. Timecourse of neural signatures of object recognition. , 2003, Journal of vision.
[35] John H. R. Maunsell,et al. Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.
[36] Michelle R. Greene,et al. Scene categorization at large visual eccentricities , 2013, Vision Research.
[37] L. Robertson,et al. Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[38] R. Marois,et al. Capacity limits of information processing in the brain , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[39] A. Mack,et al. Gist perception requires attention , 2012 .
[40] A. Smeulders,et al. A Biologically Plausible Model for Rapid Natural Image Identi cation , 2009 .
[41] Antonio Torralba,et al. Statistics of natural image categories , 2003, Network.
[42] Radoslaw Martin Cichy,et al. Resolving human object recognition in space and time , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.
[43] R. Rosenholtz,et al. A summary-statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual crowding. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[44] G. Volberg,et al. On the role of response conflicts and stimulus position for hemispheric differences in global/local processing: an ERP study , 2004, Neuropsychologia.
[45] M. Koivisto,et al. Recurrent Processing in V1/V2 Contributes to Categorization of Natural Scenes , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[46] Lester C. Loschky,et al. The contributions of central versus peripheral vision to scene gist recognition. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[47] David J. Field,et al. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.
[48] M. Seghier,et al. The Neural Substrates and Timing of Top–Down Processes during Coarse-to-Fine Categorization of Visual Scenes: A Combined fMRI and ERP Study , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[49] Abel G. Oliva,et al. Gist of a scene , 2005 .
[50] Michèle Fabre-Thorpe,et al. Rapid processing of complex natural scenes: A role for the magnocellular visual pathways? , 1999, Neurocomputing.
[51] E Donchin,et al. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[52] M. A. Bouman,et al. Opponent color coding: A mechanistic model and a new metric for color space , 1972, Kybernetik.
[53] P. Perona,et al. Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[54] Zijiang J. He,et al. Vertical and horizontal references determined by linear perspective and optic flow information , 2010 .
[55] Lynn A. Olzak,et al. Contributions of contrast gain and response gain in pattern masking , 2010 .
[56] Antonio Torralba,et al. Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition. , 2006, Progress in brain research.
[57] Marina Schmid,et al. An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .
[58] Michelle R. Greene,et al. Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[59] D. Navon. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.
[60] U. Neisser. VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.
[61] A. Kappers,et al. Tactile perception of thermal diffusivity , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[62] Song-Chun Zhu,et al. Prior Learning and Gibbs Reaction-Diffusion , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..
[63] M. Carandini,et al. The Suppressive Field of Neurons in Lateral Geniculate Nucleus , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[64] P. Perona,et al. Why does natural scene categorization require little attention? Exploring attentional requirements for natural and synthetic stimuli , 2005 .
[65] Shingo Yamagata,et al. Cerebral Asymmetry of the “Top-Down” Allocation of Attention to Global and Local Features , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[66] A. Oliva,et al. From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .
[67] Tandra Ghose,et al. Generalization between canonical and non-canonical views in object recognition. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[68] S. Thorpe,et al. How parallel is visual processing in the ventral pathway? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[69] A. Treisman. How the deployment of attention determines what we see , 2006, Visual cognition.
[70] Philippe G. Schyns,et al. Beyond Gist , 2014, Psychological science.
[71] Victor A. F. Lamme,et al. Spatially Pooled Contrast Responses Predict Neural and Perceptual Similarity of Naturalistic Image Categories , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[72] Dwight J. Kravitz,et al. The ventral visual pathway: an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[73] Shihui Han,et al. Neural mechanisms of global/local processing of bilateral visual inputs: an ERP study , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[74] Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al. Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[75] M. Jenkin,et al. Change Blindness: Implications for the Nature of Visual Attention , 2001 .
[76] Li Fei-Fei,et al. Binding is a local problem for natural objects and scenes , 2005, Vision Research.
[77] Sabine Kastner,et al. Visual attention as a multilevel selection process , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[78] George A. Alvarez,et al. Natural-Scene Perception Requires Attention , 2011, Psychological science.
[79] Michelle R. Greene,et al. The Briefest of Glances: The Time Course of Natural Scene Understanding , 2009 .
[80] Ronald A. Rensink,et al. Change blindness: past, present, and future , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[81] J. Wolfe,et al. Is visual attention required for robust picture memory? , 2007, Vision Research.
[82] Ronald Hübner,et al. Functional hemispheric differences for the categorization of global and local information in naturalistic stimuli , 2009, Brain and Cognition.
[83] Sennay Ghebreab,et al. From Image Statistics to Scene Gist: Evoked Neural Activity Reveals Transition from Low-Level Natural Image Structure to Scene Category , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[84] G. Mangun,et al. Perceptual Load and Visuocortical Processing: Event-Related Potentials Reveal Sensory-Level Selection , 2001, Psychological science.
[85] A. Torralba,et al. The role of context in object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[86] K. Dobkins,et al. Attentional effects on contrast discrimination in humans: evidence for both contrast gain and response gain , 2004, Vision Research.
[87] Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al. Early ERPs to faces: aging, luminance, and individual differences , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[88] S. Kastner,et al. Attention in the real world: toward understanding its neural basis , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[89] S. Thorpe,et al. The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[90] Christoph M. Michel,et al. Hemispheric specialization of human inferior temporal cortex during coarse-to-fine and fine-to-coarse analysis of natural visual scenes , 2005, NeuroImage.
[91] P. Mamassian. Depth, but not surface orientation, from binocular disparities , 2010 .
[92] N. Lavie. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[93] E. Yund,et al. An ERP study of the global precedence effect: the role of spatial frequency , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[94] Jochen Braun,et al. Natural scenes upset the visual applecart , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.