A Cross Benchmark Assessment of a Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Face Recognition

Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) based algorithm methods have swept face-recognition. DCNNbased algorithms have shown significant improvements in accuracy on the Labeled Faces in the Wild (LFW) and the YouTube1 Video face-recognition benchmarks. These two benchmarks consist of images and videos of celebrities downloaded from the World Wide Web. Since 2004, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has established a series of face-recognition benchmarks that span a range of scenarios and difficulties. The scenarios range from comparing frontal faces taken in studio lighting to comparing faces acquired with cell phone cameras taken outdoors. The VGG-face algorithm [7] was ran on eight NIST face-recognition benchmarks. The Vision Geometry Group (VGG)-face algorithm excelled on the most difficult benchmarks; existing algorithms excelled the benchmarks with higher quality images. This finding is consistent with the design of the algorithms. The VGG-face algorithm was designed to recognize faces in variable illumination; the existing algorithms were designed to operate on face-images taken in controlled illuminations. To accurately characterize the performance of face recognition algorithms, we recommend that performance is reported on multiple benchmarks.

[1]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Overview of the face recognition grand challenge , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[2]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 large-scale results , 2007 .

[3]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Face Recognition Algorithms surpass humans matching faces across changes in illumination | NIST , 2007 .

[4]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Face Recognition Algorithms Surpass Humans Matching Faces Over Changes in Illumination , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Marwan Mattar,et al.  Labeled Faces in the Wild: A Database forStudying Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environments , 2008 .

[6]  David A. McAllester,et al.  Cascade object detection with deformable part models , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 Large-Scale Experimental Results , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  An introduction to the good, the bad, & the ugly face recognition challenge problem , 2011, Face and Gesture 2011.

[9]  Tal Hassner,et al.  Face recognition in unconstrained videos with matched background similarity , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[10]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Comparing face recognition algorithms to humans on challenging tasks , 2012, TAP.

[11]  Vaidehi S. Natu,et al.  Unaware Person Recognition From the Body When Face Identification Fails , 2013, Psychological science.

[12]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  The challenge of face recognition from digital point-and-shoot cameras , 2013, 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[13]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Face Detection without Bells and Whistles , 2014, ECCV.

[14]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Comparison of human and computer performance across face recognition experiments , 2014, Image and Vision Computing.

[15]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Deep Face Recognition , 2015, BMVC.

[16]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Lessons from collecting a million biometric samples , 2015, FG.

[17]  Matthew Q. Hill,et al.  Perceptual expertise in forensic facial image comparison , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.