Acoustic biomolecules enhance hemodynamic functional ultrasound imaging of neural activity

Hemodynamic functional ultrasound imaging (fUS) of neural activity provides a unique combination of spatial coverage, spatiotemporal resolution and compatibility with freely moving animals. However, deep and transcranial monitoring of brain activity and the imaging of dynamics in slow-flowing blood vessels remains challenging. To enhance fUS capabilities, we introduce biomolecular hemodynamic enhancers based on gas vesicles (GVs), genetically encodable ultrasound contrast agents derived from buoyant photosynthetic microorganisms. We show that intravenously infused GVs enhance ultrafast Doppler ultrasound contrast and visually-evoked hemodynamic contrast in transcranial fUS of the mouse brain. This hemodynamic contrast enhancement is smoother than that provided by conventional microbubbles, allowing GVs to more reliably amplify neuroimaging signals.

[1]  Melissa Yin,et al.  In vivo Biodistribution of Radiolabeled Acoustic Protein Nanostructures , 2018, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[2]  F. Stuart Foster,et al.  Biogenic Gas Nanostructures as Ultrasonic Molecular Reporters , 2014, Nature nanotechnology.

[3]  Yutaka Tomita,et al.  RBC velocities in single capillaries of mouse and rat brains are the same, despite 10-fold difference in body size , 2010, Brain Research.

[4]  Alan Urban,et al.  Whole-Brain Functional Ultrasound Imaging Reveals Brain Modules for Visuomotor Integration , 2018, Neuron.

[5]  M. Emmer,et al.  Radial modulation of single microbubbles , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  J. Ophir,et al.  IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[7]  David Maresca,et al.  Nonlinear ultrasound imaging of nanoscale acoustic biomolecules. , 2017, Applied physics letters.

[8]  F. Stuart Foster,et al.  Tumor Contrast Imaging with Gas Vesicles by Circumventing the Reticuloendothelial System. , 2019, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  Jesse V Jokerst,et al.  Nanoparticle PEGylation for imaging and therapy. , 2011, Nanomedicine.

[10]  David Maresca,et al.  Nonlinear X-wave ultrasound imaging of acoustic biomolecules. , 2018, Physical review. X.

[11]  Mikhail G. Shapiro,et al.  Ultrasound imaging of gene expression in mammalian cells , 2019, Science.

[12]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Pressure-dependent attenuation and scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles at low acoustic pressures. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  Elodie Tiran,et al.  Transcranial Functional Ultrasound Imaging in Freely Moving Awake Mice and Anesthetized Young Rats without Contrast Agent , 2017, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  Melissa Yin,et al.  Acoustic Behavior of Halobacterium salinarum Gas Vesicles in the High-Frequency Range: Experiments and Modeling. , 2017, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  M. Fink,et al.  Functional ultrasound imaging of the brain , 2011, Nature Methods.

[16]  Audrey Lee-Gosselin,et al.  Acoustic reporter genes for noninvasive imaging of microbes in mammalian hosts , 2017, Nature.

[17]  David Maresca,et al.  Molecular Engineering of Acoustic Protein Nanostructures. , 2016, ACS nano.

[18]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Adaptive Spatiotemporal Filtering for Coronary Ultrafast Doppler Angiography , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[19]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Attenuation, scattering, and absorption of ultrasound in the skull bone. , 2011, Medical physics.

[20]  S. Shamma,et al.  Multi-scale mapping along the auditory hierarchy using high-resolution functional UltraSound in the awake ferret , 2018, bioRxiv.

[21]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  Functional ultrasound neuroimaging: a review of the preclinical and clinical state of the art , 2018, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[22]  B. Helfield,et al.  A Review of Phospholipid Encapsulated Ultrasound Contrast Agent Microbubble Physics. , 2019, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  P. Dayton,et al.  Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[24]  Charlie Demené,et al.  4D microvascular imaging based on ultrafast Doppler tomography , 2016, NeuroImage.

[25]  Melissa Yin,et al.  Preparation of biogenic gas vesicle nanostructures for use as contrast agents for ultrasound and MRI , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[26]  J. Sahel,et al.  Functional ultrasound imaging of the brain reveals propagation of task-related brain activity in behaving primates , 2019, Nature Communications.

[27]  Sangjin Yoo,et al.  Biomolecular Ultrasound and Sonogenetics. , 2018, Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering.

[28]  M. Fink,et al.  Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[29]  P. Tortoli,et al.  Microbubble characterization through acoustically induced deflation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[30]  Mickaël Tanter,et al.  Transcranial functional ultrasound imaging of the brain using microbubble-enhanced ultrasensitive Doppler , 2016, NeuroImage.

[31]  D O Cosgrove,et al.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: a review of sources of variability , 2011, Interface Focus.

[32]  Charlie Demené,et al.  Spatiotemporal Clutter Filtering of Ultrafast Ultrasound Data Highly Increases Doppler and fUltrasound Sensitivity , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  M. Tanter,et al.  Functional ultrasound imaging of brain activity in human newborns , 2017, Science Translational Medicine.

[34]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  3D functional ultrasound imaging of the cerebral visual system in rodents , 2017, NeuroImage.

[35]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Intraoperative Functional Ultrasound Imaging of Human Brain Activity , 2017, Scientific Reports.