A Low-Complexity Detection Scheme for Differential Spatial Modulation

Differential spatial modulation (DSM), which does not require the channel state information at the receiver, is an attractive alternative to its coherent counterpart. The optimal maximum-likelihood (ML) detector of the DSM system employs the classic block-by-block method for jointly detecting the activated antenna matrix (AM) and the modulation symbols, resulting in high computational complexity. In this letter, a low-complexity near-ML detector, which operates on a symbol-by-symbol basis, is proposed for the DSM scheme. Specifically, in each block, the index of the activated transmit antenna and modulation symbol in each time slot are first obtained, and then, these antenna indices are utilized to simply determine the index of the activated AM. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm is capable of offering almost the same performance as that of the ML detector with more than 90% reduction in complexity.

[1]  Cheng-Xiang Wang,et al.  Practical Implementation of Spatial Modulation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[2]  Jim Esch Spatial Modulation for Generalized MIMO: Challenges, Opportunities, and Implementation , 2014, Proc. IEEE.

[3]  Harald Haas,et al.  Generalised Sphere Decoding for Spatial Modulation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[4]  Lajos Hanzo,et al.  Reduced-Complexity Noncoherently Detected Differential Space-Time Shift Keying , 2011, IEEE Signal Process. Lett..

[5]  Xiang Cheng,et al.  A differential scheme for Spatial Modulation , 2013, 2013 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[6]  Harald Haas,et al.  Spatial Modulation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[7]  Cheng-Xiang Wang,et al.  Performance of Spatial Modulation Using Measured Real-World Channels , 2013, 2013 IEEE 78th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[8]  Xiang Cheng,et al.  Differential Spatial Modulation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[9]  Lajos Hanzo,et al.  Reduced-Complexity ML Detection and Capacity-Optimized Training for Spatial Modulation Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[10]  Xiang Cheng,et al.  Performance Analysis of Differential Spatial Modulation with Two Transmit Antennas , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.

[11]  P. Grant,et al.  Spatial modulation for multiple-antenna wireless systems: a survey , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[12]  Koji Ishibashi,et al.  Effects of Antenna Switching on Band-Limited Spatial Modulation , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[13]  Lajos Hanzo,et al.  Design Guidelines for Spatial Modulation , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[14]  Lajos Hanzo,et al.  Reduced-Complexity Coherent Versus Non-Coherent QAM-Aided Space-Time Shift Keying , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[15]  Yue Xiao,et al.  A New Low-Complexity Near-ML Detection Algorithm for Spatial Modulation , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[16]  Naoki Ishikawa,et al.  Unified Differential Spatial Modulation , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[17]  Lajos Hanzo,et al.  Coherent and Differential Space-Time Shift Keying: A Dispersion Matrix Approach , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.