Importance-Performance Analysis of Personal Health Records in Taiwan: A Web-Based Survey

Background Empowering personal health records (PHRs) provides basic human right, awareness, and intention for health promotion. As health care delivery changes toward patient-centered services, PHRs become an indispensable platform for consumers and providers. Recently, the government introduced “My health bank,” a Web-based electronic medical records (EMRs) repository for consumers. However, it is not yet a PHR. To date, we do not have a platform that can let patients manage their own PHR. Objective This study creates a vision of a value-added platform for personal health data analysis and manages their health record based on the contents of the "My health bank." This study aimed to examine consumer expectation regarding PHR, using the importance-performance analysis. The purpose of this study was to explore consumer perception regarding this type of a platform: it would try to identify the key success factors and important aspects by using the importance-performance analysis, and give some suggestions for future development based on it. Methods This is a cross-sectional study conducted in Taiwan. Web-based invitation to participate in this study was distributed through Facebook. Respondents were asked to watch an introductory movie regarding PHR before filling in the questionnaire. The questionnaire was focused on 2 aspects, including (1) system functions, and (2) system design and security and privacy. The questionnaire would employ 12 and 7 questions respectively. The questionnaire was designed following 5-points Likert scale ranging from 1 (“disagree strongly”) to 5 (“Agree strongly”). Afterwards, the questionnaire data was sorted using IBM SPSS Statistics 21 for descriptive statistics and the importance-performance analysis. Results This research received 350 valid questionnaires. Most respondents were female (219 of 350 participants, 62.6%), 21-30 years old (238 of 350 participants, 68.0%), with a university degree (228 of 350 participants, 65.1%). They were still students (195 out of 350 participants, 56.6%), with a monthly income of less than NT $30,000 (230 of 350 participants, 65.7%), and living in the North Taiwan (236 of 350 participants, 67.4%), with a good self-identified health status (171 of 350 participants, 48.9%). After performing the importance-performance analysis, we found the following: (1) instead of complex functions, people just want to have a platform that can let them integrate and manage their medical visit, health examination, and life behavior records; (2) they do not care whether their PHR is shared with others; and (3) most of the participants think the system security design is not important, but they also do not feel satisfied with the current security design. Conclusions Overall, the issues receiving the most user attention were the system functions, circulation, integrity, ease of use, and continuity of the PHRs, data security, and privacy protection.

[1]  Te-Hsin Liang,et al.  Matrix Analysis of the Digital Divide in eHealth Services Using Awareness, Want, and Adoption Gap , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[2]  France Légaré,et al.  Users’ perspectives of key factors to implementing electronic health records in Canada: a Delphi study , 2012, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[3]  Leslie S. Liu,et al.  Barriers to the adoption and use of personal health record systems , 2011, iConference.

[4]  Neil M. Paige,et al.  Electronic Patient Portals: Evidence on Health Outcomes, Satisfaction, Efficiency, and Attitudes , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  C. Kruse,et al.  The Effect of Patient Portals on Quality Outcomes and Its Implications to Meaningful Use: A Systematic Review , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[6]  R. Righi,et al.  Personal Health Records: A Systematic Literature Review , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  Terese Otte-Trojel,et al.  Characteristics of Patient Portals Developed in the Context of Health Information Exchanges: Early Policy Effects of Incentives in the Meaningful Use Program in the United States , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  Nick Sevdalis,et al.  “Nothing About Me Without Me”: An Interpretative Review of Patient Accessible Electronic Health Records , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  Charles Safran,et al.  Improving personal health records for patient-centered care , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  Oliver Heinze,et al.  The patients’ active role in managing a personal electronic health record: a qualitative analysis , 2015, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[11]  Kenneth D. Mandl,et al.  Are Meaningful Use Stage 2 certified EHRs ready for interoperability? Findings from the SMART C-CDA Collaborative , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  G. Rutten,et al.  Reasons and Barriers for Using a Patient Portal: Survey Among Patients With Diabetes Mellitus , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[13]  Ugur Yavas,et al.  Importance‐Performance Analysis: : A Case Study in Restaurant Positioning , 1994 .

[14]  Claudia Pagliari,et al.  Potential of electronic personal health records , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  David W. Bates,et al.  White Paper: Personal Health Records: Definitions, Benefits, and Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adoption , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  T. S. Raghu,et al.  Personal Health Records (PHR) and the future of the physician-patient relationship , 2011, iConference.

[17]  J. Wyatt,et al.  Evaluating computerised health information systems: hard lessons still to be learnt , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  K. Simpson,et al.  Patients’ Continuing Use of an Online Health Record: A Quantitative Evaluation of 14,000 Patient Years of Access Data , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[19]  Catherine L. Anderson,et al.  If We Offer it, Will They Accept? Factors Affecting Patient Use Intentions of Personal Health Records and Secure Messaging , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[20]  Tobi Saidel,et al.  Review of sampling hard-to-reach and hidden populations for HIV surveillance. , 2005, AIDS.