Reviewer Bias for Statistically Significant Results: A Reexamination.

[1]  E. Minium.  Statistical reasoning in psychology and education , 1970 .

[2]  P. Meehl.  Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. , 1978 .

[3]  D. P. Hartmann,et al.  A cautionary note on the use of omega squared to evaluate the effectiveness of behavioral treatments , 1981 .

[4]  Bruce E. Wampold,et al.  Statistical significance, reviewer evaluations, and the scientific process: Is there a (statistically) significant relationship? , 1982 .

[5]  W. Hays.  Statistics for psychologists , 1963 .

[6]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS , 1971, Pediatrics.

[8]  Joseph L. Fleiss,et al.  Estimating the magnitude of experimental effects. , 1969 .

[9]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Statistical Power Analysis and Research Results. , 1973 .

[10]  R. Kirk.  Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[11]  A. Greenwald.  Consequences of Prejudice Against the Null Hypothesis , 1975 .

[12]  James K. Brewer,et al.  On the Power of Statistical Tests in the American Educational Research Journal 1 , 1972 .

[13]  H. Friedman.  Magnitude of experimental effect and a table for its rapid estimation. , 1968 .

[14]  Richard F. Haase,et al.  How significant is a significant difference? Average effect size of research in counseling psychology. , 1982 .