Measurement of eyeball protrusion and its application in facial reconstruction.

The estimation of eyeball protrusion from the bony orbit has traditionally relied upon Wolff's theory (1976) that the cornea will be tangental to a line taken from the superior to the inferior orbital margin. This study tested this theory by taking measurements from MRI cranial images of 78 eyes of white adult subjects. Orbital depth had a significant negative linear correlation with eyeball protrusion, and protrusion of the eyeball was determined by the following standard: eyeball protrusion = 18.3 - (0.4 x orbit depth). Current eyeball position determination was shown to be as much as 3.9 mm too deep in the socket, and a practical application of this result to facial reconstruction is discussed.

[1]  Harris Hawthorne Wilder,et al.  THE PHSYSIOGNOMY OF THE INDIANS OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND , 1912 .

[2]  N. R. Miller.  Book, software, and electronic media - Wolff's Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit, Eighth edition, Anothy J. Bron, Ramesh C. Tripathi, Brenda Tripathi (Eds.). Chapman & Hall Medical, London (1997) , 1998 .

[3]  B. P. Gatliff,et al.  Reconstruction of facial features from the skull: an evaluation of its usefulness in forensic anthropology. , 1970, American journal of physical anthropology.

[4]  C N Stephan,et al.  Building faces from dry skulls: are they recognized above chance rates? , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  G. Lennerstrand,et al.  MRI measurements of normal extraocular muscles and other orbital structures , 2000, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[6]  B. P. Gatliff,et al.  Facial sculpture on the skull for identification , 1984, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[7]  Snow Cc,et al.  From skull to visage. , 1979 .

[8]  Caroline Wilkinson,et al.  Skull re-assembly and the implications for forensic facial reconstruction , 2001 .

[9]  T. D. Stewart,et al.  The points of attachment of the palpebral ligaments: their use in facial reconstructions on the skull. , 1983, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  U. Aydingoz,et al.  Normative measurements of orbital structures using MRI. , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  M. Furuta.  [Measurement of orbital volume by computed tomography--especially on the growth of orbit]. , 2001, Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi.

[12]  D T Reay,et al.  Use of facial approximation techniques in identification of Green River serial murder victims. , 1991, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[13]  W A Aulsebrook,et al.  Superimposition and reconstruction in forensic facial identification: a survey. , 1995, Forensic science international.

[14]  W. M. Krogman.  The human skeleton in forensic medicine. I. , 1963, Postgraduate medicine.

[15]  S. Tajima,et al.  Measurement of Normal Eyeball Position and Its Application for Evaluation of Exophthalmos in Craniofacial Synostosis , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  V F Ferrario,et al.  Morphometry of the Orbital Region: A Soft‐Tissue Study from Adolescence to Mid‐Adulthood , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[17]  L. Farkas,et al.  Growth patterns in the orbital region: a morphometric study. , 1992, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[18]  D. McConathy,et al.  Relationship between the piriform aperture and interalar nasal widths in adult males. , 1991, Journal of forensic sciences.

[19]  J. W. Thorpe.  Forensic Science Society Diploma Awards 2000 , 2001 .

[20]  L A Nelson,et al.  The application of volume deformation to three-dimensional facial reconstruction: a comparison with previous techniques. , 1998, Forensic science international.

[21]  G. Latta,et al.  The relationship between the width of the mouth, interalar width, bizygomatic width, and interpupillary distance in edentulous patients. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.