A more powerful exact test of noninferiority from binary matched‐pairs data

Assessing the therapeutic noninferiority of one medical treatment compared with another is often based on the difference in response rates from a matched binary pairs design. This paper develops a new exact unconditional test for noninferiority that is more powerful than available alternatives. There are two new elements presented in this paper. First, we introduce the likelihood ratio statistic as an alternative to the previously proposed score statistic of Nam (Biometrics 1997; 53:1422-1430). Second, we eliminate the nuisance parameter by estimation followed by maximization as an alternative to the partial maximization of Berger and Boos (Am. Stat. Assoc. 1994; 89:1012-1016) or traditional full maximization. Based on an extensive numerical study, we recommend tests based on the score statistic, the nuisance parameter being controlled by estimation followed by maximization.

[1]  S. Ellenberg,et al.  Placebo-Controlled Trials and Active-Control Trials in the Evaluation of New Treatments. Part 2: Practical Issues and Specific Cases , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  Y. Shiau,et al.  Detection of recurrent or persistent nasopharyngeal carcinomas after radiotherapy with technetium‐99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile single photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography , 2002, Cancer.

[3]  C. Lloyd,et al.  A New Exact and More Powerful Unconditional Test of No Treatment Effect from Binary Matched Pairs , 2008, Biometrics.

[4]  Sue-Jane Wang,et al.  A Regulatory Perspective on Choice of Margin and Statistical Inference Issue in Non‐inferiority Trials , 2005, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[5]  Yi Tsong,et al.  Utility and pitfalls of some statistical methods in active controlled clinical trials. , 2002, Controlled clinical trials.

[6]  Q. Mcnemar.  Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages , 1947, Psychometrika.

[7]  G. Barnard.  Significance tests for 2 X 2 tables. , 1947, Biometrika.

[8]  R L Berger,et al.  Exact unconditional tests for a 2 × 2 matched-pairs design , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[9]  S S Ellenberg,et al.  Placebo-Controlled Trials and Active-Control Trials in the Evaluation of New Treatments. Part 1: Ethical and Scientific Issues , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  Unconditional Exact Tests for Equivalence or Noninferiority for Paired Binary Endpoints , 2001, Biometrics.

[11]  A. Munk,et al.  Testing noninferiority in three‐armed clinical trials based on likelihood ratio statistics , 2007 .

[13]  Man‐Lai Tang,et al.  Confidence Interval for Rate Ratio in a 2 × 2 Table with Structural Zero: An Application in Assessing False‐Negative Rate Ratio When Combining Two Diagnostic Tests , 2004 .

[14]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  Non‐inferiority trials: design concepts and issues – the encounters of academic consultants in statistics , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  Ulrich Mansmann,et al.  Unconditional Non‐Asymptotic One‐Sided Tests for Independent Binomial Proportions When the Interest Lies in Showing Non‐Inferiority and/or Superiority , 1999 .

[16]  Axel Munk,et al.  Testing general hypotheses under binomial sampling: the two sample case - asymptotic theory and exact procedures , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[17]  T Tango,et al.  Equivalence test and confidence interval for the difference in proportions for the paired-sample design. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  J A Bean,et al.  On the sample size for one-sided equivalence of sensitivities based upon McNemar's test. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  Axel Munk,et al.  Unconditional exact tests for the difference of binomial probabilities - contrasted and compared , 2004, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[20]  Kurex Sidik.  Exact unconditional tests for testing non‐inferiority in matched‐pairs design , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  R. Berger,et al.  P Values Maximized Over a Confidence Set for the Nuisance Parameter , 1994 .

[22]  B. Wiens,et al.  Choosing an equivalence limit for noninferiority or equivalence studies. , 2002, Controlled clinical trials.

[23]  Chris J Lloyd,et al.  Exact one-sided confidence limits for the difference between two correlated proportions. , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  Huey-miin Hsueh,et al.  Tests for equivalence or non‐inferiority for paired binary data , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[25]  R. Berger,et al.  Bioequivalence trials, intersection-union tests and equivalence confidence sets , 1996 .

[26]  J M Nam,et al.  Establishing equivalence of two treatments and sample size requirements in matched-pairs design. , 1997, Biometrics.

[27]  Armin Koch,et al.  Hypothesis Testing in the “Gold Standard” Design for Proving the Efficacy of an Experimental Treatment Relative to Placebo and a Reference , 2004, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[28]  J. Halperin,et al.  Active-control clinical trials to establish equivalence or noninferiority: methodological and statistical concepts linked to quality. , 2003, American heart journal.