Outcome evaluation in shoulder surgery using 3D kinematics sensors.

A new method of scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder is presented. 3D accelerometers and gyroscopes attached on the humerus were used to differentiate a healthy from a painful shoulder. The method was first tested on 10 healthy volunteer subjects with no shoulder pathology. The system was then tested on 10 patients with unilateral shoulder pathology (rotator cuff disease, osteoarthritis) before and after surgery (3, 6 months). In order to evaluate the system, nine tests based on the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) were performed on each shoulder for each patient. Three scores were defined: the P score was based on the angular velocities and accelerations of the humerus; the RAV score was based only on the angular velocities of the humerus; the M score was based on the sum of all moments of the humerus. Our kinematic scores indicated significant differences between baseline and follow-up (p<0.05) and differentiated between patients with varying severity of the same condition. We demonstrated a reliable technique of evaluating shoulder pathology and the results of surgery.

[1]  M Gagnon,et al.  Strategies of load tilts and shoulders positioning in asymmetrical lifting. A concomitant evaluation of the reference systems of axes. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  László Kocsis,et al.  Joint kinematics and spatial-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ultrasound-based system. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[3]  Heinrich M. Overhoff,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty: coordinate system definition and planning based on 3-D ultrasound image volumes , 2001, CARS.

[4]  Christopher L. Vaughan,et al.  Dynamics of human gait , 1992 .

[5]  Micheline Gagnon,et al.  Biomechanical differences between best and worst performances in repeated free asymmetrical lifts , 2002 .

[6]  A. Harth,et al.  Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Dash) Questionnaire: Determining Functional Activity Profiles in Patients with Upper Extremity Disorders , 2005, Journal of hand surgery.

[7]  Y Nakagawa,et al.  Epidemiologic study of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with plain radiography. , 1999, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[8]  J. Seiler,et al.  Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. , 2002, The Journal of hand surgery.

[9]  K Aminian,et al.  Ambulatory system for the quantitative and qualitative analysis of gait and posture in chronic pain patients treated with spinal cord stimulation. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[10]  ALEXANDRA KIRKLEY,et al.  Scoring Systems for the Functional Assessment of the Shoulder , 2002 .

[11]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  B M Nigg,et al.  A method for inverse dynamic analysis using accelerometry. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Merryn J Mathie,et al.  Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[14]  R. Richards,et al.  Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires. , 1998, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[15]  D. T. Harryman,et al.  A practical tool for evaluating function: The simple shoulder test , 1993 .

[16]  C. Ekdahl,et al.  The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery , 2003, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[17]  Kirsti Grobel,et al.  Real-time hand-arm motion analysis using a single video camera , 1996, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition.

[18]  D. Felson,et al.  The use of radiographs to evaluate shoulder pain in the ED. , 1998, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[19]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  The Shoulder: A Balance of Mobility and Stability , 1993 .