Problems in data registration for persistent sensing

Persistent sensing by Unmanned Airborne Vehicles (UAVs) has brought up challenging issues including multi-scale analysis, multi-modal sensor fusion, and scene localization. As for the first issue, the multi-scale and multi-resolution issues occur when a mobile sensor changes altitudes or two different sensors with the same camera provide any redundant images from different altitudes. To overcome these issues, we first focus on collecting invariant feature data from the multi-resolution representation of a high resolution image. Recently, an information-theoretic matching criterion has been developed for robust data registration without any knowledge of feature correspondence. This criterion is used as an intelligent computing algorithm of choosing a good scale-representation that helps to find an unknown scaling factor between two different and redundant measurements. As for the second issue of multi-modal sensor fusion, we observe that Electro-optical (EO) and Infrared (IR) images in the DARPA VIVID database have an inherent scaling-difference, even though the different modalities come from the two fixed EO and IR sensors attached on the same mobile sensor. Here we provide a new experimental result of multi-modal data fusion that successfully combines complementary information via the process of data refinement. The recovered transformation reveals one of the fundamental characteristics of the two different modalities. The last issue of scene localization is required for identifying the scene visited before. In this paper, we demonstrate the trajectory of the mobile sensor based only on the extracted transformations (not relying on any telemetric data of the mobile sensor which is not available persistently) by projecting the center locations of image measurements onto the two dimensional reference coordinate.

[1]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Video mosaics for virtual environments , 1996, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[2]  Jan Flusser,et al.  Image registration methods: a survey , 2003, Image Vis. Comput..

[3]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Object recognition from local scale-invariant features , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[4]  Mark D. Hickman,et al.  Methods of analyzing traffic imagery collected from aerial platforms , 2003, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[5]  Ümit Özgüner,et al.  Information-Theoretic Data Registration for UAV-Based Sensing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  Airborne video registration and traffic-flow parameter estimation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  U. Ozguner,et al.  Multi-UAV Sensing Over Urban Areas via Layered Data Fusion , 2007, 2007 IEEE/SP 14th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing.

[8]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Scale-Space Theory in Computer Vision , 1993, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[9]  Ümit Özgüner,et al.  Robust data alignment based on information theory and its applications in road following situation , 2006, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[10]  Martin R. Varley,et al.  Improved Video Mosaic Construction by Accumulated Alignment Error Distribution , 1998, BMVC.

[11]  Supun Samarasekera,et al.  Aerial video surveillance and exploitation , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[12]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  An Iterative Image Registration Technique with an Application to Stereo Vision , 1981, IJCAI.

[13]  J. Weickert,et al.  Information Measures in Scale-Spaces , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.