Glycolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: algorithmic exploration of robustness and origin of oscillations.

The glycolysis pathway in saccharomyces cerevisiae is considered, modeled by a dynamical system possessing a normally hyperbolic, exponentially attractive invariant manifold, where it exhibits limit cycle behavior. The fast dissipative action simplifies considerably the exploration of the system's robustness, since its dynamical properties are mainly determined by the slow dynamics characterizing the motion along the limit cycle on the slow manifold. This manifold expresses a number of equilibrations among components of the cellular mechanism that have a non-negligible projection in the fast subspace, while the motion along the slow manifold is due to components that have a non-negligible projection in the slow subspace. The characteristic time scale of the limit cycle can be directly altered by perturbing components whose projection in the slow subspace contributes to its generation. The same effect can be obtained indirectly by perturbing components whose projection in the fast subspace participates in the generated equilibrations, since the slow manifold will thus be displaced and the slow dynamics must adjust. Along the limit cycle, the characteristic time scale exhibits successively a dissipative and an explosive nature (leading towards or away from a fixed point, respectively). Depending on their individual contribution to the dissipative or explosive nature of the characteristic time scale, the components of the cellular mechanism can be classified as either dissipative or explosive ones. Since dissipative/explosive components tend to diminish/intensify the oscillatory behavior, one would expect that strengthening a dissipative/explosive component will diminish/intensify the oscillations. However, it is shown that strengthening dissipative (explosive) components might lead the system to amplified oscillations (fixed point). By employing the Computational Singular Perturbation method, it is demonstrated that such a behavior is due to the constraints imposed by the slow manifold.

[1]  L. A. Segel,et al.  The Quasi-Steady-State Assumption: A Case Study in Perturbation , 1989, SIAM Rev..

[2]  J. Gunawardena Models in Systems Biology: The Parameter Problem and the Meanings of Robustness , 2010 .

[3]  Mattias Goksör,et al.  Sustained glycolytic oscillations in individual isolated yeast cells , 2012, The FEBS journal.

[4]  S. Lam,et al.  The CSP method for simplifying kinetics , 1994 .

[5]  S. H. Lam,et al.  Using CSP to Understand Complex Chemical Kinetics ∗ , 1992 .

[6]  Dimitris A. Goussis,et al.  Asymptotic Solution of Stiff PDEs with the CSP Method: The Reaction Diffusion Equation , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[7]  Barbara M. Bakker,et al.  Can yeast glycolysis be understood in terms of in vitro kinetics of the constituent enzymes? Testing biochemistry. , 2000, European journal of biochemistry.

[8]  F. Verhulst Methods and applications of singular perturbations , 2005 .

[9]  Tamás Turányi,et al.  Analysis of a Budding Yeast Cell Cycle Model Using the Shapes of Local Sensitivity Functions , 2008 .

[10]  S. H. Lam,et al.  Understanding complex chemical kinetics with computational singular perturbation , 1989 .

[11]  B. Hess,et al.  SUBSTRATE CONTROL OF GLYCOLYTIC OSCILLATIONS , 1973 .

[12]  Sune Danø,et al.  On the mechanisms of glycolytic oscillations in yeast , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[13]  P. Richard,et al.  The rhythm of yeast. , 2003, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[14]  Richard C Aiken,et al.  Stiff computation , 1985 .

[15]  D. Fell Metabolic control analysis: a survey of its theoretical and experimental development. , 1992, The Biochemical journal.

[16]  Ferdinand Verhulst,et al.  Periodic Solutions and Slow Manifolds , 2007, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[17]  C. Wilke,et al.  Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems , 2006 .

[18]  Bernhard Sendhoff,et al.  Robustness of glycolysis in yeast to internal and external noise. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  A. Wagner Robustness and evolvability: a paradox resolved , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Iliya V. Karlin,et al.  Method of invariant manifold for chemical kinetics , 2003 .

[21]  A. d’Onofrio Uniqueness and global attractivity of glycolytic oscillations suggested by Selkov’s model , 2010 .

[22]  Habib N. Najm,et al.  An automatic procedure for the simplification of chemical kinetic mechanisms based on CSP , 2006 .

[23]  Dimitris A. Goussis,et al.  Quasi steady state and partial equilibrium approximations: their relation and their validity , 2012 .

[24]  S. H. Lam,et al.  A study of homogeneous methanol oxidation kinetics using CSP , 1992 .

[25]  Dimitris A. Goussis,et al.  Physical understanding of complex multiscale biochemical models via algorithmic simplification: Glycolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2010 .

[26]  B. Hess,et al.  Transitions between oscillatory modes in a glycolytic model system. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  H. A. van den Berg,et al.  Interaction of fast and slow dynamics in endocrine control systems with an application to β-cell dynamics. , 2012, Mathematical biosciences.

[28]  Mauro Valorani,et al.  An efficient iterative algorithm for the approximation of the fast and slow dynamics of stiff systems , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[29]  Periodic orbits in glycolytic oscillators: From elliptic orbits to relaxation oscillations , 2011, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[30]  Hans G. Kaper,et al.  Two perspectives on reduction of ordinary differential equations , 2005 .

[31]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Biological robustness , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[32]  Thomas Erneux,et al.  Rescue of the Quasi-Steady-State Approximation in a Model for Oscillations in an Enzymatic Cascade , 2006, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[33]  B. Ingalls,et al.  Autonomously oscillating biochemical systems: parametric sensitivity of extrema and period. , 2004, Systems biology.

[34]  Barbara M. Bakker,et al.  How yeast cells synchronize their glycolytic oscillations: a perturbation analytic treatment. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[35]  Antonis Papachristodoulou,et al.  Model decomposition and reduction tools for large-scale networks in systems biology , 2011, Autom..

[36]  Melanie I. Stefan,et al.  BioModels Database: An enhanced, curated and annotated resource for published quantitative kinetic models , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[37]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  A method for determining the robustness of bio-molecular oscillator models , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[38]  G. Odell,et al.  Robustness, Flexibility, and the Role of Lateral Inhibition in the Neurogenic Network , 2002, Current Biology.

[39]  Mudita Singhal,et al.  COPASI - a COmplex PAthway SImulator , 2006, Bioinform..

[40]  P. Maini,et al.  Multiscale modeling in biology , 2007 .

[41]  Neil Fenichel Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations , 1979 .

[42]  Dimitris A. Goussis,et al.  Algorithmic asymptotic analysis of the NF-κBNF-κB signaling system , 2013, Comput. Math. Appl..

[43]  Gentian Buzi,et al.  Glycolytic Oscillations and Limits on Robust Efficiency , 2011, Science.

[44]  B. Hess,et al.  Oscillatory phenomena in biochemistry. , 1971, Annual review of biochemistry.

[45]  Ioannis G. Kevrekidis,et al.  Projecting to a Slow Manifold: Singularly Perturbed Systems and Legacy Codes , 2005, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[46]  H. Kitano,et al.  Computational systems biology , 2002, Nature.

[47]  G. Wagner,et al.  EVOLUTION AND DETECTION OF GENETIC ROBUSTNESS , 2003 .

[48]  K. Pye,et al.  Sustained sinusoidal oscillations of reduced pyridine nucleotide in a cell-free extract of Saccharomyces carlsbergensis. , 1966, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  Ulrich Maas,et al.  Model Reduction for Combustion Chemistry , 2011 .

[50]  Edda Klipp,et al.  Exploring the effect of variable enzyme concentrations in a kinetic model of yeast glycolysis. , 2008, Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics.

[51]  Hans G. Kaper,et al.  Fast and Slow Dynamics for the Computational Singular Perturbation Method , 2004, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[52]  J Das,et al.  Analysis of the dynamics of relaxation type oscillation in glycolysis of yeast extracts. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[53]  E. Pye GLYCOLYTIC OSCILLATIONS IN CELLS AND EXTRACTS OF YEAST - SOME UNSOLVED PROBLEMS , 1973 .

[54]  E. Sel'kov,et al.  Self-oscillations in glycolysis. 1. A simple kinetic model. , 1968, European journal of biochemistry.

[55]  P. Maini,et al.  Hierarchically coupled ultradian oscillators generating robust circadian rhythms. , 1997, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[56]  Francis J. Doyle,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of oscillatory (bio)chemical systems , 2005, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[57]  Jörg Stelling,et al.  Systems analysis of cellular networks under uncertainty , 2009, FEBS letters.

[58]  Habib N. Najm,et al.  Higher order corrections in the approximation of low-dimensional manifolds and the construction of simplified problems with the CSP method , 2005 .

[59]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[60]  Hans G Othmer,et al.  A multi-time-scale analysis of chemical reaction networks: I. Deterministic systems , 2010, Journal of mathematical biology.

[61]  H. Busse,et al.  Sustained oscillations in glycolysis: an experimental and theoretical study of chaotic and complex periodic behavior and of quenching of simple oscillations. , 1998, Biophysical chemistry.

[62]  F. Hynne,et al.  Full-scale model of glycolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, Biophysical chemistry.

[63]  M. Reuss,et al.  In vivo analysis of metabolic dynamics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: II. Mathematical model. , 1997, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[64]  Natal A. W. van Riel,et al.  Dynamic modelling and analysis of biochemical networks: mechanism-based models and model-based experiments , 2006, Briefings Bioinform..

[65]  Marc R. Roussel,et al.  Geometry of the steady-state approximation: Perturbation and accelerated convergence methods , 1990 .

[66]  Irina Surovtsova,et al.  Simplification of biochemical models: a general approach based on the analysis of the impact of individual species and reactions on the systems dynamics , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[67]  J Schaber,et al.  Nested uncertainties in biochemical models. , 2009, IET systems biology.

[68]  Martin Mönnigmann,et al.  A simple work flow for biologically inspired model reduction - application to early JAK-STAT signaling , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[69]  Hans G. Kaper,et al.  Asymptotic analysis of two reduction methods for systems of chemical reactions , 2002 .

[70]  Habib N. Najm,et al.  CSP analysis of a transient flame-vortex interaction: time scales and manifolds , 2003 .

[71]  Irina Surovtsova,et al.  Accessible methods for the dynamic time-scale decomposition of biochemical systems , 2009, Bioinform..

[72]  Linda R Petzold,et al.  Oscillator model reduction preserving the phase response: application to the circadian clock. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[73]  S. H. Lam,et al.  CONVENTIONAL ASYMPTOTICS AND COMPUTATIONAL SINGULAR PERTURBATION FOR SIMPLIFIED KINETICS MODELLING , 1999 .

[74]  E. Marbán,et al.  Oscillations of membrane current and excitability driven by metabolic oscillations in heart cells. , 1994, Science.

[75]  Habib N. Najm,et al.  Model Reduction and Physical Understanding of Slowly Oscillating Processes: The Circadian Cycle , 2006, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[76]  Corrado Priami,et al.  Algorithmic systems biology , 2009, CACM.

[77]  A. Goldbeter,et al.  Biochemical Oscillations And Cellular Rhythms: Contents , 1996 .

[78]  Tamás Turányi,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Bacterial Chemotaxis Models , 2011, FET.

[79]  Jacky L. Snoep,et al.  BioModels Database: a free, centralized database of curated, published, quantitative kinetic models of biochemical and cellular systems , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[80]  Ulrich Maas,et al.  Simplifying chemical kinetics: Intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space , 1992 .

[81]  G. Hek Geometric singular perturbation theory in biological practice , 2010 .

[82]  B. Corkey,et al.  Temporal patterns of changes in ATP/ADP ratio, glucose 6-phosphate and cytoplasmic free Ca2+ in glucose-stimulated pancreatic beta-cells. , 1996, The Biochemical journal.

[83]  M. Siegal,et al.  Robustness: mechanisms and consequences. , 2009, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[84]  Yi Zhou,et al.  Catabolic efficiency of aerobic glycolysis: The Warburg effect revisited , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[85]  H. Weitzner,et al.  Perturbation Methods in Applied Mathematics , 1969 .

[86]  D. Kell,et al.  Schemes of flux control in a model of Saccharomyces cerevisiae glycolysis. , 2002, European journal of biochemistry.

[87]  J. Higgins,et al.  A CHEMICAL MECHANISM FOR OSCILLATION OF GLYCOLYTIC INTERMEDIATES IN YEAST CELLS. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[88]  Sorensen,et al.  Chaos in Glycolysis , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[89]  Ferdinand Verhulst,et al.  Invariant Manifolds in Dissipative Dynamical Systems , 2005 .

[90]  A. Ghosh,et al.  Oscillations of glycolytic intermediates in yeast cells. , 1964, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[91]  James P. Keener,et al.  Mathematical physiology , 1998 .

[92]  Habib N. Najm,et al.  Analysis of methane–air edge flame structure , 2010 .