Estimating Emotions Through Language Statistics and Embodied Cognition

Recent research has suggested that language processing activates perceptual simulations. We have demonstrated that findings that have been attributed to an embodied cognition account can also be explained by language statistics, because language encodes perceptual information. We investigated whether comprehension of emotion words can be explained by an embodied cognition or a language statistics account. A corpus linguistic study comparing emotions words showed that words denoting the same emotions (happy–delighted) co-occur more frequently than different emotions (happy–angry). These findings were used in two experiments in which participants read same-emotion and different-emotion sentence pairs. Sentence pairs with different emotions yielded longer RTs than sentences with the same emotions both in a cognitive task tailored toward linguistic representations and a task tailored toward embodied representations. These findings contribute to a growing body of literature that demonstrates that language processing does not always rely solely on perceptual simulation.

[1]  H. Leventhal A perceptual motor theory of emotion , 1982 .

[2]  P. Shaver,et al.  Emotion knowledge: further exploration of a prototype approach. , 1987 .

[3]  F. Strack,et al.  Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Ramon C. Littell,et al.  SAS for Linear Models , 2002 .

[7]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Verifying Different-Modality Properties for Concepts Produces Switching Costs , 2003, Psychological science.

[8]  Cowles M.K. SAS for Linear Models (4th ed.) , 2004 .

[9]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Grounding Cognition: Introduction to Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking , 2005 .

[10]  David Havas,et al.  Differences in action tendencies distinguish anger and sadness after comprehension of emotional sentences , 2007 .

[11]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Emotion simulation during language comprehension , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  D. McNamara,et al.  Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society , 2007 .

[13]  M. Louwerse Embodied relations are encoded in language , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[15]  M. Louwerse,et al.  The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing , 2010, Cognition.

[16]  Max M. Louwerse,et al.  Symbol Interdependency in Symbolic and Embodied Cognition , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[17]  Max M. Louwerse,et al.  A Taste of Words: Linguistic Context and Perceptual Simulation Predict the Modality of Words , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  M. Louwerse,et al.  Neurological Evidence Linguistic Processes Precede Perceptual Simulation in Conceptual Processing , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[19]  M. Louwerse,et al.  Language statistics and individual differences in processing primary metaphors , 2013 .

[20]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Registered Replication Report , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[21]  Gabriel Recchia,et al.  Effect size matters: the role of language statistics and perceptual simulation in conceptual processing , 2015 .

[22]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Registered Replication Report , 2016, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.