Exploiting the intra-subject latency variability from single-trial event-related potentials in the P3 time range: A review and comparative evaluation of methods

HIGHLIGHTSIntra‐subject variability (ISV) is reflected by single trial event‐related potentials (ERPs).We reviewed and compared eight algorithms for measuring ISV on ERP.The methods were applied on both simulated and empirical data.The relations between ISV measured from ERP and ISV from behavior were examined.The latency‐invariant ERP component cluster biases the measurement of ISV. ABSTRACT The intra‐subject variability (ISV) in brain responses during cognitive processing across experimental trials has been recognised as an important facet of neural functionality reflecting an intrinsic neurophysiological characteristic of the brain. In recent decades, ISV in behaviour has been found to be significantly associated with cognitive functioning varying across individuals, development, ages, and pathological conditions. Event‐related potentials (ERPs) measured in single trials are important tools for characterizing ISV at the neural level. However, due to the overlapping spectra of noise and signals, the retrieval of information from single‐trial ERPs related to cognitive processing has been a challenge. We review the major problems that researchers face in the estimation of ISV in single‐trial ERPs. Then, we present an extensive evaluation of several methods of single‐trial latency estimation based on both simulated and real data. The relationships of ISV in ERPs and reaction times are compared between the different single‐trial methods to assess their relative efficiency in predicting task performance from neural signals. The pros and cons of the methods are discussed.

[1]  K. Harris,et al.  A Simple Model of Cortical Dynamics Explains Variability and State Dependence of Sensory Responses in Urethane-Anesthetized Auditory Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Dissociating the Influence of Affective Word Content and Cognitive Processing Demands on the Late Positive Potential , 2015, Brain Topography.

[3]  J. Ford,et al.  Age differences in P3-reaction time associations. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Human Microsaccade-Related Visual Brain Responses , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Lars T Westlye,et al.  Becoming Consistent: Developmental Reductions in Intraindividual Variability in Reaction Time Are Related to White Matter Integrity , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  A F Kramer,et al.  Simulation studies of latency measures of components of the event-related brain potential. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[7]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Review Moment-to-moment Brain Signal Variability: a next Frontier in Human Brain Mapping? , 2022 .

[8]  Masatoshi Nakamura,et al.  A morphological filter for extracting waveform characteristics of single-sweep evoked potentials , 1999, Autom..

[9]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Overcoming limitations of the ERP method with Residue Iteration Decomposition (RIDE): a demonstration in go/no-go experiments. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[10]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  Stuart W. S. MacDonald,et al.  Intraindividual variability in performance as a theoretical window onto cognitive aging , 2004 .

[12]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of choice complexity on different subcomponents of the late positive complex of the event-related potential. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  Peter E. Clayson,et al.  How does noise affect amplitude and latency measurement of event-related potentials (ERPs)? A methodological critique and simulation study. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[14]  D K Prasher,et al.  Latency variability and temporal interrelationships of the auditory event-related potentials (N1, P2, N2, and P3) in normal subjects. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[16]  Birgit Stürmer,et al.  Accessory stimuli affect the emergence of conflict, not conflict control. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[17]  C. Doucet,et al.  The effect of response execution on P3 latency, reaction time, and movement time. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[18]  Kristine B. Walhovd,et al.  Reduced White Matter Integrity Is Related to Cognitive Instability , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  J. C. Hansen.  Separation of overlapping waveforms having known temporal distributions , 1983, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[21]  T. Gasser,et al.  Variable latencies of noisy signals: Estimation and testing in brain potential data , 1987 .

[22]  Werner Sommer,et al.  P1 and beyond: functional separation of multiple emotion effects in word recognition. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[23]  Brian A. Lopez,et al.  P3a from visual stimuli: task difficulty effects. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[24]  E Donchin,et al.  Second Thoughts : Multiple P 3 OOs Elicited by a Single Stimulus , 2005 .

[25]  Todd C. Handy,et al.  Event-related potentials : a methods handbook , 2005 .

[26]  J. Polich.  Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Association cortex potentials and reaction time in auditory discrimination. , 1972, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  R. Verleger.  On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[29]  S. Luck.  An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .

[30]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  The P600-as-P3 hypothesis revisited: Single-trial analyses reveal that the late EEG positivity following linguistically deviant material is reaction time aligned , 2014, Brain and Language.

[31]  C. Woody.  Characterization of an adaptive filter for the analysis of variable latency neuroelectric signals , 1967, Medical and biological engineering.

[32]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  A Bayesian approach to estimate evoked potentials , 2002, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[33]  E. Milne.  Increased Intra-Participant Variability in Children with Autistic Spectrum Disorders: Evidence from Single-Trial Analysis of Evoked EEG , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[34]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  A Bayesian method to estimate single-trial event-related potentials with application to the study of the P300 variability , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  P. Jaskowski,et al.  Amplitudes and latencies of single-trial ERP's estimated by a maximum-likelihood method , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  G. Gerstein,et al.  Trial-to-Trial Variability and State-Dependent Modulation of Auditory-Evoked Responses in Cortex , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Kaipio,et al.  Subspace regularization method for the single-trial estimation of evoked potentials , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. , 1977, Science.

[39]  A. Jensen,et al.  THE SUPPRESSED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IQ AND THE REACTION TIME SLOPE PARAMETER OF THE HICK FUNCTION , 1998 .

[40]  S Nishida,et al.  Estimate of physiological variability of peak latency in single sweep P300. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[41]  Sidney Katz,et al.  Is Wiener Filtering an Effective Method of Improving Evoked Potential Estimation? , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  W. Sommer,et al.  Postperceptual effects and P300 latency. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[43]  Joseph Dien,et al.  Evaluating two-step PCA of ERP data with Geomin, Infomax, Oblimin, Promax, and Varimax rotations. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[44]  Andrea Hasenstaub,et al.  State Changes Rapidly Modulate Cortical Neuronal Responsiveness , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Piotr Jaskowski,et al.  Evidence for an Integrative Role of P3b in Linking Reaction to Perception , 2005 .

[46]  Michael A. Hunter,et al.  Inconsistency in response time as an indicator of cognitive aging , 2005 .

[47]  Stephan Bender,et al.  Annual research review: Reaction time variability in ADHD and autism spectrum disorders: measurement and mechanisms of a proposed trans-diagnostic phenotype. , 2014, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[48]  Christoph Klein,et al.  Electrocortical correlates of intra-subject variability in reaction times: Average and single-trial analyses , 2011, Biological Psychology.

[49]  Jun Zhang,et al.  A multi-component decomposition algorithm for event-related potentials , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[50]  E. Gordon,et al.  Measurement of maximum variability within event related potentials in schizophrenia , 1991, Psychiatry Research.

[51]  G. Hajcak,et al.  Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: evidence from temporal-spatial PCA. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[52]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Updating and validating a new framework for restoring and analyzing latency-variable ERP components from single trials with residue iteration decomposition (RIDE). , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[53]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Decomposing stimulus and response component waveforms in ERP , 1998, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[54]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components — A tutorial , 2011, NeuroImage.

[55]  H Pratt,et al.  Brain potentials in a memory-scanning task. I. Modality and task effects on potentials to the probes. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[56]  J. Ford,et al.  Schizophrenics have fewer and smaller P300s: A single-trial analysis , 1994, Biological Psychiatry.

[57]  Suiping Wang,et al.  Re-Examination of Chinese Semantic Processing and Syntactic Processing: Evidence from Conventional ERPs and Reconstructed ERPs by Residue Iteration Decomposition (RIDE) , 2015, PloS one.

[58]  J. Kaiser,et al.  Electrophysiological and information processing variability predicts memory decrements associated with normal age-related cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease (AD) , 2006, Brain Research.

[59]  J. Polich,et al.  Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[60]  J Möcks,et al.  Novel approaches to the problem of latency jitter. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[61]  D. Borsboom,et al.  Simpson's paradox in psychological science: a practical guide , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[62]  E. Donchin,et al.  Parsing the late positive complex: mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[63]  R. Quian Quiroga,et al.  Single-trial event-related potentials with wavelet denoising , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[64]  S Makeig,et al.  Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  D G Thomas,et al.  Analyses of single-trial N1 amplitude and latency variability and their influence on the average evoked potential. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[66]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[67]  R. Verleger,et al.  An evaluation of methods for single-trial estimation of P3 latency. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[68]  Christoph Klein,et al.  Increased reaction time variability in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder as a response-related phenomenon: evidence from single-trial event-related potentials. , 2015, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[69]  M G Coles,et al.  A procedure for using multi-electrode information in the analysis of components of the event-related potential: vector filter. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[70]  Kristine B Walhovd,et al.  P300 amplitude age reductions are not caused by latency jitter. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[71]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[72]  A. Jensen,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF INTRAINDIVIDUAL VARIATION IN REACTION TIME , 1992 .

[73]  Gerald E. Larson,et al.  Reaction time variability and intelligence: A “worst performance” analysis of individual differences , 1990 .

[74]  Madalena Costa,et al.  Multiscale entropy analysis of biological signals. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[75]  C. Grady,et al.  Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Signal Variability Is More than Just Noise , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[76]  E. Strauss,et al.  Inconsistency in reaction time across the life span. , 2005, Neuropsychology.

[77]  W. Sommer,et al.  Residue iteration decomposition (RIDE): A new method to separate ERP components on the basis of latency variability in single trials. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[78]  E Donchin,et al.  A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. , 1981, Science.

[79]  L D Blumhardt,et al.  Wave form variations in auditory event-related potentials evoked by a memory-scanning task and their relationship with tests of intellectual function. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[80]  Werner Sommer,et al.  A toolbox for residue iteration decomposition (RIDE)—A method for the decomposition, reconstruction, and single trial analysis of event related potentials , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[81]  Yoshiharu Yamamoto,et al.  Temporal decomposition of EEG during a simple reaction time task into stimulus- and response-locked components , 2008, NeuroImage.

[82]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Aging-Related Increases in Behavioral Variability: Relations to Losses of Dopamine D1 Receptors , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[83]  Andrea Hildebrandt,et al.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of individual differences in face cognition: A replication and extension , 2014, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[84]  Mika P. Tarvainen,et al.  Single-trial dynamical estimation of event-related potentials: a Kalman filter-based approach , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[85]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Testing the stimulus-to-response bridging function of the oddball-P3 by delayed response signals and residue iteration decomposition (RIDE) , 2014, NeuroImage.

[86]  Andrea Krott,et al.  Removing speech artifacts from electroencephalographic recordings during overt picture naming , 2015, NeuroImage.

[87]  Anders M. Fjell,et al.  Instability in the latency of P3a/P3b brain potentials and cognitive function in aging , 2009, Neurobiology of Aging.