The analytic hierarchy process to support decision-making processes in infrastructure projects with social impact

There is an increasing awareness among all kinds of organisations (in business, government and civil society) about the benefits of jointly working with stakeholders to satisfy both their goals and the social demands placed upon them. This is particularly the case within corporate social responsibility (CSR) frameworks. In this regard, multi-criteria tools for decision-making like the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) described in the paper can be useful for the building relationships with stakeholders. Since these tools can reveal decision-maker's preferences, the integration of opinions from various stakeholders in the decision-making process may result in better and more innovative solutions with significant shared value. This paper is based on ongoing research to assess the feasibility of an AHP-based model to support CSR decisions in large infrastructure projects carried out by Red Eléctrica de España, the sole transmission agent and operator of the Spanish electricity system.

[1]  James R. Evans,et al.  Corporate social responsibility: Implications for performance excellence , 2010 .

[2]  La estructuración de las relaciones con Grupos de Interés (stakeholders) como fuente de innovación organizativa. , 2008 .

[3]  Abby Ghobadian,et al.  TQM and CSR nexus , 2007 .

[4]  Peter Neergaard,et al.  From periphery to center: how CSR is integrated in mainstream performance management frameworks , 2008 .

[5]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Participatory multicriteria decision analysis with Web-HIPRE: a case of lake regulation policy , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  G. Apostolakis,et al.  Prioritizing stakeholder concerns in environmental risk management , 1999 .

[7]  Jayanath Ananda,et al.  The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning , 2003 .

[8]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[9]  M. Clarkson.  A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[10]  J. R. Nielsen,et al.  Stakeholder preferences for Danish fisheries management of sand eel and Norway pout , 2006 .

[11]  Gopal K. Kanji,et al.  Corporate social responsibility in a global economy , 2010 .

[12]  Klaus J. Zink,et al.  Stakeholder orientation and corporate social responsibility as a precondition for sustainability , 2005 .

[13]  R. Freeman.  The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions , 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[14]  Aplicación del modelo AHP como apoyo para la toma de decisiones en proyectos de grandes infraestructuras con impacto social. , 2009 .

[15]  Sean Pascoe,et al.  Management Objective Importance in Fisheries: An Evaluation Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) , 2004, Environmental management.

[16]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[17]  M. Masozera.  SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OF THE CONSERVATION OF THE NYUNGWE FOREST RESERVE, RWANDA , 2002 .

[18]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  Prométhée: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis , 1984 .