Respondent-driven sampling : A new approach to the study of hidden populations

A population is “hidden” when no sampling frame exists and public acknowledgment of membership in the population is potentially threatening. Accessing such populations is difficult because standard probability sampling methods produce low response rates and responses that lack candor. Existing procedures for sampling these populations, including snowball and other chain-referral samples, the key-informant approach, and targeted sampling, introduce well-documented biases into their samples. This paper introduces a new variant of chain-referral sampling, respondent-driven sampling, that employs a dual system of structured incentives to overcome some of the deficiencies of such samples. A theoretic analysis, drawing on both Markov-chain theory and the theory of biased networks, shows that this procedure can reduce the biases generally associated with chain-referral methods. The analysis includes a proof showing that even though sampling begins with an arbitrarily chosen set of initial subjects, as do most chain-referral samples, the composition of the ultimate sample is wholly independent of those initial subjects. The analysis also includes a theoretic specification of the conditions under which the procedure yields unbiased samples. Empirical results, based on surveys of 277 active drug injectors in Connecticut, support these conclusions. Finally, the conclusion discusses how respondent- driven sampling can improve both network sampling and ethnographic 44 investigation.

[1]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice , 1976 .

[2]  M. Freedman,et al.  The Functions of Social Conflict , 1959 .

[3]  Georg Simmel,et al.  Conflict.@@@The Web of Group-Affiliations. , 1955 .

[4]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  AIDS Prevention Outreach Among Injection Drug Users: Agency Problems and New Approaches* , 1994 .

[5]  H E Evans Public policy and AIDS. , 1994, Clinics in perinatology.

[6]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN THE SAMPLING OF SPECIAL POPULATIONS , 1986 .

[7]  Bonnie H. Erickson,et al.  Some Problems of Inference from Chain Data , 1979 .

[8]  Anatol Rapoport,et al.  A probabilistic approach to networks , 1979 .

[9]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Collective Sanctions and Compliance Norms: A Formal Theory of Group-Mediated Social Control , 1990 .

[10]  S. Welch SAMPLING BY REFERRAL IN A DISPERSED POPULATION , 1975 .

[11]  M. Spreen,et al.  PERSONAL NETWORK SAMPLING, OUTDEGREE ANALYSIS AND MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS: INTRODUCING THE NETWORK CONCEPT IN STUDIES OF HIDDEN POPULATIONS , 1994 .

[12]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  RATIONAL CHOICE, PUBLIC POLICY AND AIDS , 1996 .

[13]  E. Deaux,et al.  Key Informant Versus Self-Report Estimates of Health-Risk Behavior , 1985 .

[14]  P. Biernacki,et al.  TARGETED SAMPLING: OPTIONS FOR THE STUDY OF HIDDEN POPULATIONS , 1989 .

[15]  P. Killworth,et al.  The reversal small-world experiment , 1978 .

[16]  Albert B. Bishop Chapter IX – System Stability , 1975 .

[17]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Collective Action and Group Heterogeneity: Voluntary Provision Versus Selective Incentives , 1993 .

[18]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Drug Users versus Outreach Workers in Combating Aids: Preliminary Results of a Peer-Driven Intervention , 1995 .

[19]  D. Heckathorn The dynamics and dilemmas of collective action , 1996 .

[20]  John Skvoretz,et al.  Biased networks and social structure theorems: Part II , 1984 .

[21]  M. Spreen Rare Populations, Hidden Populations, and Link-Tracing Designs: What and Why? , 1992 .

[22]  M. Horwitz,et al.  Arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance win or loss. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.