Associations between the objective and perceived built environment and bicycling for transportation

Abstract This paper investigates the relative associations between the objectively-measured built environment versus stated perceptions of the built environment and bicycling. Data are from a random phone survey conducted in the Portland, Oregon, region. Binary logit and linear regression models, using objective measures, perceived measures, and both sets of measures, were estimated to predict propensity of bicycling and frequency of bicycling separately. Results showed that the perceived environment and objective environment had different associations with bicycling. This suggests that future research should include both measures when possible and that a supportive objective environment is necessary for bicycling. Intervention programs to improve people׳s perceptions of the environment may be also necessary to reap the full potential of planning and design policies. The results also suggest that it is useful to predict bicycling propensity and bicycling frequency separately, as the predictors of each behavior do vary. For the objective measures, bicycle paths and lanes and minor streets were associated with higher propensity of bicycling for transportation, while paths and nearby retail destinations were associated with higher bicycling frequency. Perceptions of the environment did not predict the propensity to bicycle, after controlling for attitudes towards daily travel, but did predict bicycling frequency. Finally, the analysis confirms the importance of attitudes in predicting behavior.

[1]  Kees Maat,et al.  The role of attitudes toward characteristics of bicycle commuting on the choice to cycle to work over various distances , 2011 .

[2]  J. M. Oakes,et al.  Cycling, the Built Environment, and Health: Results of a Midwestern Study , 2015 .

[3]  A. Herring,et al.  Exploring Associations between Physical Activity and Perceived and Objective Measures of the Built Environment , 2007, Journal of Urban Health.

[4]  Shannon J. Brines,et al.  Land use, residential density, and walking. The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  Objective versus subjective measures of the built environment, which are most effective in capturing associations with walking? , 2010, Health & place.

[6]  J. Mullahy.  Specification and testing of some modified count data models , 1986 .

[7]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Factors Affecting Bicycling Demand , 2007 .

[8]  D. Ogilvie,et al.  Interventions to promote cycling: systematic review , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Ilse de Bourdeaudhuij,et al.  Environmental perceptions as mediators of the relationship between the objective built environment and walking among socio-economically disadvantaged women , 2013, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[10]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Logistic Regression Using the SAS System : Theory and Application , 1999 .

[11]  Lawrence D. Frank,et al.  Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research , 2004 .

[12]  O. Franco,et al.  Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: urban land transport , 2009, The Lancet.

[13]  M. Brauer,et al.  Built Environment Influences on Healthy Transportation Choices: Bicycling versus Driving , 2010, Journal of urban health.

[14]  Delbert S. Elliott,et al.  Subjective Constructions of Neighborhood Boundaries: Lessons from a Qualitative Study of Four Neighborhoods , 2009 .

[15]  C. Coulton,et al.  How Big is My Neighborhood? Individual and Contextual Effects on Perceptions of Neighborhood Scale , 2013, American journal of community psychology.

[16]  Nathan McNeil,et al.  Four Types of Cyclists? , 2013 .

[17]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  A Statewide Analysis of Bicycling in New Jersey , 2011 .

[18]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Factors Correlated with Bicycle Commuting: A Study in Six Small U.S. Cities , 2011 .

[19]  A. Cheadle,et al.  Cycling and the Built Environment, a US Perspective , 2005 .

[20]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability , 2009 .

[21]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Identifying and Measuring Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability. , 2006, Journal of physical activity & health.

[22]  Frank Witlox,et al.  Why people use their cars while the built environment imposes cycling , 2013 .

[23]  B. Armstrong,et al.  Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makers , 2009, The Lancet.

[24]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[25]  Chris Rissel,et al.  Health benefits of cycling , 2015 .

[26]  Christine M. Hoehner,et al.  Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[27]  K. Evenson,et al.  Comparing Perceived and Objectively Measured Access to Recreational Facilities as Predictors of Physical Activity in Adolescent Girls , 2007, Journal of Urban Health.

[28]  Lawrence D Frank,et al.  Environmental and demographic correlates of bicycling. , 2013, Preventive medicine.

[29]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Factors associated with bicycling to high school: insights from Davis, CA , 2012 .

[30]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[31]  C. Coulton,et al.  Mapping Residents' Perceptions of Neighborhood Boundaries: A Methodological Note , 2001, American journal of community psychology.

[32]  A. Bauman,et al.  Mismatch between perceived and objectively assessed neighborhood walkability attributes: prospective relationships with walking and weight gain. , 2011, Health & place.

[33]  R. Pate,et al.  Correlates of recreational and transportation physical activity among adults in a New England community. , 2003, Preventive medicine.

[34]  Christine M. Hoehner,et al.  Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[35]  Johannes Brug,et al.  Objective and perceived availability of physical activity opportunities: differences in associations with physical activity behavior among urban adolescents , 2009, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[36]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Self-Selection in the Relationship between the Built Environment and Walking: Empirical Evidence from Northern California , 2006 .

[37]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  The objective versus the perceived environment: what matters for bicycling? , 2014 .

[38]  J. Pucher,et al.  Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[39]  B. Ostro,et al.  Health cobenefits and transportation-related reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in the San Francisco Bay area. , 2013, American journal of public health.

[40]  Kees Maat,et al.  Commuting by Bicycle: An Overview of the Literature , 2010 .