Psychometric comparisons of three measures for assessing motor functions in preschoolers with intellectual disabilities.

BACKGROUND Deficit in motor performance is common in children with intellectual disabilities (ID). A motor function measure with sound psychometric properties is indispensable for clinical and research use. The purpose of this study was to compare the psychometric properties of three commonly used clinical measures for assessing motor function in preschoolers with ID: the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition, the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-Second Edition (PDMS-2). METHOD One hundred and ninety-one children aged 3-6 years with ID were evaluated with the three measures at three time points: two baseline measurements with a 1-week interval before the intervention, and a follow-up measurement after 6 months of paediatric rehabilitation programme. One hundred and forty-one participants completed all of the assessments. The distribution (ceiling and floor effects) and reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) of each measure were examined. Concurrent validity, predictive validity, and responsiveness were examined as well. RESULTS All measures, except for the PDMS-2, had significant floor effects or ceiling effects at one or more time points. The three measures had good internal consistency (Cronbach α ≥ 0.86) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.96). The Spearman ρ correlation coefficient for each pair of the three measures was ≥ 0.80, indicating high concurrent validity. The predictive validity of the three measures was satisfactory (Spearman ρ ≥ 0.52). The responsiveness of the three measures was moderate (0.47 ≤ effect size ≤ 0.74). The minimal detectable changes of the three measures were satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS All three measures showed sufficient reliability, validity and responsiveness in preschoolers with ID, but the PDMS-2 is recommended for its superior psychometric properties.

[1]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  Applying Concepts of Generalizability Theory on Clinical Trial Data to Investigate Sources of Variation and Their Impact on Reliability , 2005, Biometrics.

[2]  B. Fridley,et al.  Practical Guidelines for Assessing the Clinical Significance of Health-Related Quality of Life Changes within Clinical Trials , 2003 .

[3]  Yee-Pay Wuang,et al.  Rasch analysis of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition in intellectual disabilities. , 2009, Research in developmental disabilities.

[4]  W M Tierney,et al.  Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. , 1999, Medical care.

[5]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[6]  Lewis E. Kazis,et al.  Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status , 1989, Medical care.

[7]  D. Beaton,et al.  Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research. , 2002, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[8]  M. Liang,et al.  Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic Evaluation , 1990, Medical care.

[9]  Carolynn Patten,et al.  Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[10]  P Tugwell,et al.  Criteria for clinically important changes in outcomes: development, scoring and evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patient and trial profiles. OMERACT Committee. , 1993, The Journal of rheumatology.

[11]  J. Shea,et al.  Performance of a new, HIV/AIDS-targeted quality of life (HAT-QoL) instrument in asymptomatic seropositive individuals , 1997, Quality of Life Research.

[12]  R. C. Barnhart.  Aging Adult Children with Developmental Disabilities and Their Families , 2002 .

[13]  Ronald V. Croce,et al.  Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children , 2001, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  D. Sugden,et al.  Intervention in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: the role of parents and teachers. , 2003, The British journal of educational psychology.

[15]  M. Msall,et al.  Functional limitations and key indicators of well-being in children with disability. , 2000, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[16]  D. Gladman,et al.  Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  G. Grimby,et al.  Activity limitations in personal, domestic and vocational tasks: a study of adults with inborn and early acquired mobility disorders , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[18]  R. P. Di Fabio,et al.  Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  Ted Brown,et al.  The Movement Assessment Battery for Children—Second Edition (MABC-2): A Review and Critique , 2009, Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics.

[20]  C. Terwee,et al.  Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach , 2006, Quality of Life Research.

[21]  B. Connolly,et al.  Concurrent Validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID-II) Motor Scale and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale II (PDMS-2) in 12-Month-Old Infants , 2006, Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association.

[22]  Nynke Smidt,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of the assessment of severity of complaints, grip strength, and pressure pain threshold in patients with lateral epicondylitis. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  J. Zamora,et al.  Minimum detectable and minimal clinically important changes for pain in patients with nonspecific neck pain , 2008, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[24]  J. McComas,et al.  Barriers and Facilitators to Inclusive Education , 2002 .

[25]  Yee-Pay Wuang,et al.  Reliability and responsiveness of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition in children with intellectual disability. , 2009, Research in developmental disabilities.

[26]  D. Turner.  DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION AND APPLICATION OF A PEDIATRIC ULCERATIVE COLITIS ACTIVITY INDEX (PUCAI) , 2008 .

[27]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. , 1994 .

[29]  F. Hu,et al.  Functional performance of children with developmental coordination disorder at home and at school , 2009, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[30]  K. Bruynesteyn,et al.  Robustness and generalizability of smallest detectable difference in radiological progression. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[31]  M. Liang,et al.  Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[32]  D L Riddle,et al.  Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. , 1996, Physical therapy.

[33]  J. Steiner,et al.  Health and Quality of Life Outcomes , 2006 .

[34]  W. Coster,et al.  Functional performance in children with Down syndrome. , 2004, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[35]  J. Blacher.  Transition to adulthood: mental retardation, families, and culture. , 2001, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[36]  Miao-Ju Hsu,et al.  Psychometric Comparisons of 3 Functional Ambulation Measures for Patients With Stroke , 2010, Stroke.

[37]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Evaluation of clumsiness in children. , 2002, American family physician.

[38]  R. Linn,et al.  The development of the School Function Assessment Chinese version for cross-cultural use in Taiwan. , 2004, Occupational therapy international.