Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE To measure residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in order to improve the prognostic information that can be obtained from evaluating pathologic response. PATIENTS AND METHODS Pathologic slides and reports were reviewed from 382 patients in two different treatment cohorts: sequential paclitaxel (T) then fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) in 241 patients; and a single regimen of FAC in 141 patients. Residual cancer burden (RCB) was calculated as a continuous index combining pathologic measurements of primary tumor (size and cellularity) and nodal metastases (number and size) for prediction of distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) in multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS RCB was independently prognostic in a multivariate model that included age, pretreatment clinical stage, hormone receptor status, hormone therapy, and pathologic response (pathologic complete response [pCR] v residual disease [RD]; hazard ratio = 2.50; 95% CI 1.70 to 3.69; P < .001). Minimal RD (RCB-I) in 17% of patients carried the same prognosis as pCR (RCB-0). Extensive RD (RCB-III) in 13% of patients was associated with poor prognosis, regardless of hormone receptor status, adjuvant hormone therapy, or pathologic American Joint Committee on Cancer stage of residual disease. The generalizability of RCB for prognosis of distant relapse was confirmed in the FAC-treated validation cohort. CONCLUSION RCB determined from routine pathologic materials represented the distribution of RD, was a significant predictor of DRFS, and can be used to define categories of near-complete response and chemotherapy resistance.

[1]  Anna L. Brown,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  J. Blohmer,et al.  Doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel every 21 days compared with doxorubicin and docetaxel every 14 days as preoperative treatment in operable breast cancer: the GEPARDUO study of the German Breast Group. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Roman Rouzier,et al.  Change in tumor cellularity of breast carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a variable in the pathologic assessment of response , 2004, Cancer.

[4]  Terry L. Smith,et al.  Weekly paclitaxel improves pathologic complete remission in operable breast cancer when compared with paclitaxel once every 3 weeks. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Terry L. Smith,et al.  Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy and blood cell autografts for high-risk primary breast carcinoma. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Management of stage III primary breast cancer with primary chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy , 1988, Cancer.

[7]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Pathological assessment of response to induction chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 1986, Cancer research.

[8]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Pathological complete response and residual DCIS following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  Michael W Kattan,et al.  Judging new markers by their ability to improve predictive accuracy. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  Donald A. Berry,et al.  Estrogen-receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer , 2006 .

[12]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Effects of chemotherapy on pathologic and biologic characteristics of locally advanced breast cancer. , 1997, American journal of clinical pathology.

[13]  H. Tsuda,et al.  Unargued issues on the pathological assessment of response in primary systemic therapy for breast cancer. , 2005, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[14]  Jesse A. Berlin,et al.  Assessing the Generalizability of Prognostic Information , 1999 .

[15]  Frank E. Harrell,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2001 .

[16]  D G Altman,et al.  What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Outcome after pathologic complete eradication of cytologically proven breast cancer axillary node metastases following primary chemotherapy. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  M Schumacher,et al.  Resampling and cross-validation techniques: a tool to reduce bias caused by model building? , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  Donald L Weaver,et al.  Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Andreas Makris,et al.  Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  P. Hurteloup,et al.  Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Pilot Study of Intensive Induction Chemotherapy (FEC‐HD) Results in a High Histologic Response Rate , 1993 .

[23]  Terry L. Smith,et al.  The use of alternate, non-cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of pathologic response to a neoadjuvant doxorubicin-based regimen in women with operable breast cancer: long-term results from a prospective randomized trial. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Prospective evaluation of paclitaxel versus combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  Thomas R Fleming,et al.  Surrogate endpoints and FDA's accelerated approval process. , 2005, Health affairs.

[26]  Norman R. Draper,et al.  On Distributions and Their Transformation to Normality , 1969 .

[27]  A. Hutcheon,et al.  A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. , 2003, Breast.

[28]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Prognostic role of clinical, pathological and biological characteristics in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[29]  Norman Wolmark,et al.  Sequential preoperative or postoperative docetaxel added to preoperative doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide for operable breast cancer:National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  L. Carey,et al.  American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast cancer outcome. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[31]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Residual ductal carcinoma in situ in patients with complete eradication of invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not adversely affect patient outcome. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  Z. Baloch,et al.  Pathologic response to induction chemotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the breast: a determinant of outcome. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[33]  M. Kurosumi Significance of histopatholoaical evaluation in primary therapy for breast cancer-recent trends in primary modality with pathological complete response(pCR) as endpoint , 2004, Breast cancer.

[34]  Richard Simon,et al.  Roadmap for developing and validating therapeutically relevant genomic classifiers. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.