A model for star rating school walking routes

Walking is fundamental to mobility, but its perceived importance as a transport mode has fallen dramatically in past decades. The potential benefits of walking for society are numerous, including improved health, reduced traffic and congestion and enhanced social connections. It has become a community health priority to introduce some of these benefits to children by encouraging active transport to and from school. While walking should be encouraged, pedestrians are vulnerable road users, with one of the biggest potential injury threats being road crossing points and it is therefore vitally important to ensure that children can select safe locations to cross roads. To assist community members to select safe walking routes for children, a model and iPhone/iPad app to rate the safety of individual road crossings were devised, based on the lstar ratingr concept familiar to many. The model considered the evidence-based key determinants of pedestrian crash and injury risk at individual road crossings. Based on established relationships and expert consensus, the variables were combined mathematically to generate a star rating between zero and five for each crossing point along a route. While the model is designed primarily in recognition of the abilities and limitations of children, it could also be adapted to other walking populations and road environments. This paper presents the methods undertaken to develop the resource, some sample results and discusses the implications and opportunities for its use to enhance the safety of all pedestrian groups.

[1]  M Wigan Walking as a Transport Mode , 1994 .

[2]  Annika Nilsson,et al.  How to enhance WALking and CYcliNG instead of shorter car trips and to make these modes safer. Public. Deliverable D6. Walcyng Contract No: UR-96-SC.099 , 1998 .

[3]  David M. Nichols,et al.  Implicit Rating and Filtering , 1998 .

[4]  Angelo Dominic D'Elia,et al.  Child pedestrians: factors associated with ability to cross roads safely and development of a training package , 2008 .

[5]  James E. Harrison,et al.  Serious injury due to land transport accidents, Australia, 2003-04 , 2007 .

[6]  G Lundberg,et al.  The Swedish National Road Administration , 1996 .

[7]  S. Forward,et al.  BEHAVIOURAL FACTORS AFFECTING MODAL CHOICE , 1998 .

[8]  James A. Thomson Child development and the aims of road safety education : a review and analysis , 1996 .

[9]  Johnnie Ben-Edigbe Effective speed management at residential areas , 2007 .

[10]  F. Racioppi,et al.  Physical Activity and Health in Europe: Evidence for Action , 2006 .

[11]  Bruce Corben,et al.  OLDER VULNERABLE ROAD USERS: MEASURES TO REDUCE CRASH AND INJURY RISK , 2004 .

[12]  S. Jensen Pedestrian Safety in Denmark , 1999 .

[13]  J. Catford,et al.  Promoting healthy weight--the new environmental frontier. , 2003, Health promotion international.

[14]  T Cave,et al.  PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENT PROJECT REPORT NO. 4: LITERATURE REVIEW OF FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENTS , 1988 .

[15]  Bruce Corben,et al.  Estimating pedestrian fatal crash risk , 2006 .

[16]  A J McLean,et al.  Vehicle travel speeds and the incidence of fatal pedestrian crashes. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Charles V. Zegeer,et al.  Safety Effects of Marked Versus Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations: Analysis of Pedestrian Crashes in 30 Cities , 2001 .

[18]  Andrew L Sussman,et al.  Implementation of a walking school bus: lessons learned. , 2009, The Journal of school health.

[19]  Gary A. Davis,et al.  Relating Severity of Pedestrian Injury to Impact Speed in Vehicle-Pedestrian Crashes: Simple Threshold Model , 2001 .