Higher growth through the Blue Ocean Strategy: implications for economic policy

Higher growth is a key goal of companies, governments, and societies. Economic policies often attempt to attain this goal by targeting companies of certain sizes that operate in specific industries and focus on a specific business activity. This approach to policy making has considerable shortcomings and seems to be less than fully effective in increasing economic growth. We suggest a new approach to policy making that stems directly from the entrepreneurial perspective. This approach examines a successful business strategy framework – the Blue Ocean Strategy – to discover conditions for high growth. We test

[1]  Mary O'Mahony,et al.  Economic Growth in Europe: A Comparative Industry Perspective , 2010 .

[2]  P. Davidsson,et al.  Arriving at the high growth firm , 2003 .

[3]  Ganesh Vaidyanathan,et al.  Using a value creation compass to discover “Blue Oceans” , 2009 .

[4]  Kamel Mellahi,et al.  Does it pay to be a first mover in e.commerce? The case of Amazon.com , 2000 .

[5]  E. P. Michael Strategy and the Internet. , 2001 .

[6]  Charles F. Sabel,et al.  HISTORICAL ALTERNATIVES TO MASS PRODUCTION: POLITICS, MARKETS AND TECHNOLOGY IN NINETEEN-THCENTURY INDUSTRIALIZATION , 1985 .

[7]  Charles Steindel,et al.  Productivity: What is it, and Why Do We Care About it? , 2001 .

[8]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Winning through innovation , 1997 .

[9]  Magnus Henrekson,et al.  Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence , 2010 .

[10]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[11]  Douglas J. Cumming,et al.  Government Policy Towards Entrepreneurial Finance: Innovation Investment Funds , 2007 .

[12]  Michael Quinn Patton,et al.  How to use qualitative methods in evaluation , 1987 .

[13]  C. Hillinger Output, Income and Welfare of Nations: Concepts and Measurment , 2003 .

[14]  A. Bikfalvi Innovation, entrepreneurship and outsourcing: essays on the use of knowledge in business environments , 2007 .

[15]  Y. Furukawa,et al.  The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: Is stronger always better? , 2007 .

[16]  A. Kleinknecht,et al.  Flexible Labour, Firm Performance and the Dutch Job Creation Miracle , 2006 .

[17]  C. Sabel,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity , 1984 .

[18]  Pamela Mueller,et al.  Employment effects of business dynamics: Mice, Gazelles and Elephants , 2007 .

[19]  William Lazonick,et al.  Competitive Advantage on the Shop Floor , 1992 .

[20]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law , 2003 .

[21]  David J. North,et al.  The characteristics and strategies of high growth SMEs , 1995 .

[22]  M. Wright,et al.  Agency, Strategic Entrepreneurship, and the Performance of Private Equity–Backed Buyouts , 2009 .

[23]  B. Jones,et al.  The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems , 2006 .

[24]  B. Jones The politics of attention , 2005 .

[25]  Jaime R. Marquez,et al.  International Comparisons of Productivity Growth : The Role of Information Technology and Regulatory Practices , 2002 .

[26]  S. Majumdar Private Enterprise Growth and Human Capital Productivity in India , 2007 .

[27]  Haibin Wu,et al.  Ability-heterogeneity, entrepreneurship, and economic growth , 2010 .

[28]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Science, Technology and Innovation for Economic Growth: Linking Policy Research and Practice in "STIG Systems" , 2009 .

[29]  W. Gibb Dyer,et al.  Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt , 1991 .

[30]  F. Rutten,et al.  The evidence-based approach in health policy and health care delivery. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[31]  Birgitte Andersen,et al.  In search of a useful theory of the productive potential of intellectual property rights , 2008 .

[32]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[33]  Mojca Bavdaž,et al.  Achieving a response from fast-growing companies: the case of Slovenian gazelles , 2009 .

[34]  C. Markides Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory* , 2006 .

[35]  Hans Landström,et al.  Pioneers in entrepreneurship and small business research , 2005 .

[36]  P. Krugman MAKING SENSE OF THE COMPETITIVENESS DEBATE , 1996 .

[37]  R. Scapens Researching management accounting practice: The role of case study methods , 1990 .

[38]  R. Langlois,et al.  Innovation, Networks, and Vertical Integration , 1995 .

[39]  Z. Ács,et al.  Innovation and Small Firms , 1990 .

[40]  R. Rothwell Small firms, innovation and industrial change , 1989 .

[41]  S. Lall Competitiveness Indices and Developing Countries: An Economic Evaluation of the Global Competitiveness Report , 2001 .

[42]  Renée Mauborgne,et al.  Blue ocean strategy. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[43]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[44]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[45]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Strategic Entrepreneurship at Universities: Academic Entrepreneurs’ Assessment of Policy Programs , 2009 .

[46]  Mateja Drnovšek Job Creation Process in a Transition Economy , 2004 .

[47]  G. Hamel Leading the Revolution , 2000 .

[48]  G. Pisano Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution , 2006 .

[49]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[50]  R. Florida,et al.  The Breakthrough Illusion: Corporate America's Failure To Move From Innovation To Mass Production , 1990 .

[51]  W. Kim,et al.  Creating new market space. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[52]  J. Holmes,et al.  Enhancing the use of science in environmental policy-making and regulation , 2008 .

[53]  R. Freeman Evaluating the European View that the United States Has No Unemployment Problem , 1988 .