New product adoption in social networks: Why direction matters

Marketing managers and researchers generally agree that analyzing data from social networks and using them to influence consumers' purchase decisions are useful strategies. However, not all social network data may identify the most influential customers. This empirical study of more than 300 students reveals the low explanatory power of friendship networks (e.g., Facebook) and undirected-advice networks (e.g., LinkedIn). Only directed-advice networks (e.g., Google+) clearly identify influential consumers. In addition, the results challenge conventional wisdom that firms should target advisers assuming that they have the strongest influence on new product adoption. This study contradicts this common assumption and reveals that structural equivalence drives product adoption more than cohesion because advisees' adoption pressures advisers to purchase the product as well. Finally, the study shows the value of social network data beyond the traditional ego-centric psychographic metrics, such as innovativeness or opinion leadership.

[1]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. , 1982 .

[2]  Christophe Van den Bulte,et al.  Social Networks and Marketing , 2007 .

[3]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  6. Katz, E. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[4]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[5]  Claude S. Fischer,et al.  Urban-to-Rural Diffusion of Opinions in Contemporary America , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach, 2nd ed. , 1971 .

[7]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[8]  D. Midgley,et al.  Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement , 1978 .

[9]  Joffre Swait,et al.  Enriching Scanner Panel Models with Choice Experiments , 2003 .

[10]  Mark Wallace,et al.  The Effects of the Social Structure of Digital Networks on Viral Marketing Performance , 2008 .

[11]  Alex Bavelas,et al.  Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups , 1950 .

[12]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  The Impact of Marketing-Induced versus Word-of-Mouth Customer Acquisition on Customer Equity Growth , 2008 .

[14]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign , 1968 .

[15]  R. Burt.  Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .

[17]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research , 1988 .

[19]  L. Flynn,et al.  The King and Summers opinion leadership scale: Revision and refinement , 1994 .

[20]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek , 2005 .

[21]  W. Bearden,et al.  Consumer Innovativeness and the Adoption Process , 1995 .

[22]  Frank Harary,et al.  Graph theory in network analysis , 1983 .

[23]  E. Hirschman.  Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity , 1980 .

[24]  L. Flynn,et al.  Opinion leaders and opinion seekers: Two new measurement scales , 1996 .

[25]  L. Sailer.  Structural equivalence: Meaning and definition, computation and application , 1978 .

[26]  L. Festinger.  Social pressures in informal groups : a study of human factors in housing / by Leon Festinger, Stanley Schachter and Kurt Back , 1950 .

[27]  Robert Dahlstrom,et al.  The Ties that Buy: The Role of Interfirm Social Contagion Across Customer Accounts , 2011 .

[28]  Stefan Stremersch,et al.  Social Contagion and Income Heterogeneity in New Product Diffusion: A Meta-Analytic Test , 2004 .

[29]  Oliver Hinz,et al.  The Impact of Information Diffusion on Bidding Behavior in Secret Reserve Price Auctions , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  David Godes,et al.  Firm-Created Word-of-Mouth Communication: Evidence from a Field Test , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[31]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[32]  C. Bulte,et al.  Referral Programs and Customer Value. , 2011 .

[33]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[34]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[35]  Stanley Presser,et al.  SURVEY PRETESTING: DO DIFFERENT METHODS PRODUCE DIFFERENT RESULTS? , 1994 .

[36]  K. Pauwels,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth versus Traditional Marketing: Findings from an Internet Social Networking Site , 2009 .

[37]  René Algesheimer,et al.  The Impact of Customer Community Participation on Customer Behaviors: An Empirical Investigation , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[38]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation , 1985 .

[39]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .

[40]  J. Goldenberg,et al.  The Role of Hubs in the Adoption Process , 2009 .

[41]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[42]  Edward M. Reingold,et al.  Graph drawing by force‐directed placement , 1991, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[43]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[44]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  Distinctive Roles of Lead Users and Opinion Leaders in the Social Networks of Schoolchildren , 2009 .

[45]  Fang Wu,et al.  Social Networks that Matter: Twitter Under the Microscope , 2008, First Monday.

[46]  Oliver Hinz,et al.  The interplay between psychometric and sociometric data and the willingness to adopt innovations , 2011 .

[47]  T. Valente.  Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations , 1996 .

[48]  John O. Summers,et al.  Overlap of Opinion Leadership across Consumer Product Categories , 1970 .

[49]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation , 1997 .

[50]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[51]  Ruth N. Bolton,et al.  Customer-to-Customer Interactions: Broadening the Scope of Word of Mouth Research , 2010 .

[52]  Jan U. Becker,et al.  Seeding Strategies for Viral Marketing: An Empirical Comparison , 2011 .

[53]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Innovation Diffusion and New Product Growth Models in Marketing , 1979 .

[54]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model , 1997, MIS Q..