Technical potentials and costs for reducing global anthropogenic methane emissions in the 2050 timeframe –results from the GAINS model

Methane is the second most important greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide contributing to human-made global warming. Keeping to the Paris Agreement of staying well below two degrees warming will require a concerted effort to curb methane emissions in addition to necessary decarbonization of the energy systems. The fastest way to achieve emission reductions in the 2050 timeframe is likely through implementation of various technical options. The focus of this study is to explore the technical abatement and cost pathways for reducing global methane emissions, breaking reductions down to regional and sector levels using the most recent version of IIASA’s Greenhouse gas and Air pollution Interactions and Synergies (GAINS) model. The diverse human activities that contribute to methane emissions make detailed information on potential global impacts of actions at the regional and sectoral levels particularly valuable for policy-makers. With a global annual inventory for 1990–2015 as starting point for projections, we produce a baseline emission scenario to 2050 against which future technical abatement potentials and costs are assessed at a country and sector/technology level. We find it technically feasible in year 2050 to remove 54 percent of global methane emissions below baseline, however, due to locked in capital in the short run, the cumulative removal potential over the period 2020–2050 is estimated at 38 percent below baseline. This leaves 7.7 Pg methane released globally between today and 2050 that will likely be difficult to remove through technical solutions. There are extensive technical opportunities at low costs to control emissions from waste and wastewater handling and from fossil fuel production and use. A considerably more limited technical abatement potential is found for agricultural emissions, in particular from extensive livestock rearing in developing countries. This calls for widespread implementation in the 2050 timeframe of institutional and behavioural options in addition to technical solutions.

[1]  Di Chen,et al.  Substantial methane emissions from abandoned coal mines in China. , 2022, Environmental research.

[2]  Ipcc Global Warming of 1.5°C , 2022 .

[3]  P. Heytens 6. Technical Change in Wetland Rice Agriculture , 2020 .

[4]  V. Brovkin,et al.  The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017 , 2016, Earth System Science Data.

[5]  R. Howarth Ideas and perspectives: is shale gas a major driver of recent increase in global atmospheric methane? , 2019, Biogeosciences.

[6]  Pete Smith,et al.  Data for long-term marginal abatement cost curves of non-CO2 greenhouse gases , 2019, Data in brief.

[7]  J. Sheng,et al.  Bottom-Up Estimates of Coal Mine Methane Emissions in China: A Gridded Inventory, Emission Factors, and Trends , 2019, Environmental Science & Technology Letters.

[8]  C. Sweeney,et al.  Long‐Term Measurements Show Little Evidence for Large Increases in Total U.S. Methane Emissions Over the Past Decade , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[9]  S. Michel,et al.  Very Strong Atmospheric Methane Growth in the 4 Years 2014–2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement , 2019, Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

[10]  V. Arora,et al.  Tracing the climate signal: mitigation of anthropogenic methane emissions can outweigh a large Arctic natural emission increase , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[11]  W. Willett,et al.  Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems , 2019, The Lancet.

[12]  R. Horton,et al.  The 21st-century great food transformation , 2019, The Lancet.

[13]  Scot M. Miller,et al.  China’s coal mine methane regulations have not curbed growing emissions , 2019, Nature Communications.

[14]  Adrian R. Camilleri,et al.  Consumers underestimate the emissions associated with food but are aided by labels , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[15]  P. Bhave,et al.  Estimating emissions from open burning of municipal solid waste in municipalities of Nepal. , 2018, Waste management.

[16]  L. Höglund-Isaksson,et al.  Carbon in global waste and wastewater flows – its potential as energy source under alternative future waste management regimes , 2018, Advances in Geosciences.

[17]  Jinfeng Chang,et al.  Inventory of methane emissions from livestock in China from 1980 to 2013 , 2018, Atmospheric Environment.

[18]  M. Omara,et al.  Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain , 2018, Science.

[19]  M. Islam,et al.  Municipal solid waste generation in China: influencing factor analysis and multi-model forecasting , 2018 .

[20]  P. Havlík,et al.  Global environmental costs of China's thirst for milk , 2018, Global change biology.

[21]  Structural change as a key component for agricultural non-CO2 mitigation efforts , 2018, Nature Communications.

[22]  S. Reimann,et al.  Discrepancy between simulated and observed ethane and propane levels explained by underestimated fossil emissions , 2018, Nature Geoscience.

[23]  M. A. Sundset,et al.  Methane emissions are lower from reindeer fed lichens compared to a concentrate feed , 2018 .

[24]  L. Hockstad,et al.  Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks , 2018 .

[25]  Building a Competitive and Inclusive Livestock Sector in Nicaragua , 2017 .

[26]  J. Greet,et al.  Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research , 2017 .

[27]  seCTOR in Uruguay LOW emissiOns DeVeLOPmenT OF THe BeeF CATTLe seCTOR in URUGUAY Reducing enteric methane for food security and livelihoods , 2017 .

[28]  Karli Verghese,et al.  Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories , 2017 .

[29]  Lena Höglund-Isaksson,et al.  Bottom-up simulations of methane and ethane emissions from global oil and gas systems 1980 to 2012 , 2017 .

[30]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  U.S. CH4 emissions from oil and gas production: Have recent large increases been detected? , 2016 .

[31]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Inventory of anthropogenic methane emissions in mainland China from 1980 to 2010 , 2016 .

[32]  Kim Andersson,et al.  Sanitation, Wastewater Management and Sustainability: from Waste Disposal to Resource Recovery , 2016 .

[33]  A. Dassargues,et al.  Underground pumped storage hydroelectricity using abandoned works (deep mines or open pits) and the impact on groundwater flow , 2016, Hydrogeology Journal.

[34]  J. Thies,et al.  Mitigating methane emission from paddy soil with rice-straw biochar amendment under projected climate change , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Louisa Emmons,et al.  Evaluating ethane and methane emissions associated with the development of oil and natural gas extraction in North America , 2016 .

[36]  P. Scarborough,et al.  Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  O. Hasekamp,et al.  A large increase in U.S. methane emissions over the past decade inferred from satellite data and surface observations , 2016 .

[38]  Allen L Robinson,et al.  Methane Emissions from Conventional and Unconventional Natural Gas Production Sites in the Marcellus Shale Basin. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  Mikhail Zhizhin,et al.  Methods for Global Survey of Natural Gas Flaring from Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite Data , 2015 .

[40]  R. Sussmann,et al.  Contribution of oil and natural gas production to renewed increase in atmospheric methane (2007–2014): top–down estimate from ethane and methane column observations , 2015 .

[41]  S. Ogle,et al.  Global mitigation potential and costs of reducing agricultural non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions through 2030 , 2015 .

[42]  Anthony J. Marchese,et al.  Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Joe Cresko,et al.  Russian anthropogenic black carbon: Emission reconstruction and Arctic black carbon simulation , 2015 .

[44]  Jeff Peischl,et al.  Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from the Haynesville, Fayetteville, and northeastern Marcellus shale gas production regions , 2015 .

[45]  D. Bastviken,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of alkaline bleaching wastewater from a kraft pulp and paper mill using UASB technique , 2015, Environmental technology.

[46]  C. Kessel,et al.  Reducing greenhouse gas emissions, water use, and grain arsenic levels in rice systems , 2015, Global change biology.

[47]  G. Janssens‑Maenhout,et al.  Anthropogenic methane sources, emissions and future projections , 2015 .

[48]  J. Greet,et al.  Chapter 5: Anthropogenic methane sources, emissions and future projections , 2015 .

[49]  Arctic Monitoring,et al.  AMAP Assessment 2015: Methane as an Arctic climate forcer. , 2015 .

[50]  T. Adhya,et al.  WEttING AND DRyING: REDuCING GREENhOuSE GAS EmISSIONS AND SAvING WAtER FROm RICE PRODuCtION , 2014 .

[51]  R. Dickerson,et al.  Regional air quality impacts of hydraulic fracturing and shale natural gas activity: Evidence from ambient VOC observations , 2014 .

[52]  Lizhi Wang,et al.  Methane emission inventories for enteric fermentation and manure management of yak, buffalo and dairy and beef cattle in China from 1988 to 2009 , 2014 .

[53]  O. Schneising,et al.  Remote sensing of fugitive methane emissions from oil and gas production in North American tight geologic formations , 2014 .

[54]  M. Evans,et al.  Russian policy on methane emissions in the oil and gas sector: A case study in opportunities and challenges in reducing short-lived forcers , 2014 .

[55]  C. Wiedinmyer,et al.  Global emissions of trace gases, particulate matter, and hazardous air pollutants from open burning of domestic waste. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[56]  Robert W Howarth,et al.  Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  E. Kort,et al.  Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems , 2014, Science.

[58]  Philippe Bousquet,et al.  Methane on the Rise—Again , 2014, Science.

[59]  D. Mccabe,et al.  Quantifying Cost-Effectiveness of Systematic Leak Detection and Repair Programs Using Infrared Cameras , 2014 .

[60]  W. Abrahamse,et al.  Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis , 2013 .

[61]  Annika Björn,et al.  Methane potentials of the Swedish pulp and paper industry – A screening of wastewater effluents , 2013 .

[62]  James Thomas,et al.  Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  Gabrielle Pétron,et al.  Methane emissions estimate from airborne measurements over a western United States natural gas field , 2013 .

[64]  M. Sharma,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Brewery Waste Water Treatment Plant , 2013 .

[65]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  Atmospheric CH4 in the first decade of the 21st century: Inverse modeling analysis using SCIAMACHY satellite retrievals and NOAA surface measurements , 2013 .

[66]  Performance Evaluation of Brewery Waste Water Treatment , 2013 .

[67]  R. Jahagirdar TREATMENT OF SUGAR INDUSTRY WASTEWATER USING ELECTROCOAGULATION TECHNIQUE , 2013 .

[68]  Torleif Haugland,et al.  Associated Petroleum Gas Flaring Study for Russia , Kazakhstan , Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan Final Report , 2013 .

[69]  A. Rotz,et al.  Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production - A review of technical options for non-CO2 emissions , 2013 .

[70]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Tackling climate change through livestock : a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities , 2013 .

[71]  L. Höglund-Isaksson Global anthropogenic methane emissions 2005-2030: technical mitigation potentials and costs , 2012 .

[72]  J. Bruinsma,et al.  World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision , 2012 .

[73]  L. Cathles Assessing the greenhouse impact of natural gas , 2012 .

[74]  N. Hashim,et al.  Anaerobic Digestion of Nssc Pulping Effluent , 2012 .

[75]  Daniel Hoornweg,et al.  What a waste? : a global review of solid waste management , 2012 .

[76]  Kaarle Kupiainen,et al.  Simultaneously Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change and Improving Human Health and Food Security , 2012, Science.

[77]  Opportunities and challenges from the use of genomic selection for beef cattle breeding in Latin America , 2012 .

[78]  Jens Borken-Kleefeld,et al.  Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: Modeling and policy applications , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[79]  E. C. Pires,et al.  Anaerobic treatment of cellulose bleach plant wastewater: chlorinated organics and genotoxicity removal , 2011 .

[80]  Timothy J. Skone,et al.  Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Inventory of Natural Gas Extraction, Delivery and Electricity Production , 2011 .

[81]  H. Arelovich,et al.  Development, characteristics, and trends for beef cattle production in Argentina , 2011 .

[82]  L. Phong,et al.  Impact of intensification of different types of livestock production in smallholder crop-livestock systems☆ , 2011 .

[83]  Jörgen Ejlertsson,et al.  Anaerobic treatment of activated sludge from Swedish pulp and paper mills – biogas production potential and limitations , 2011, Environmental technology.

[84]  G. Russell,et al.  Effects of genetic line and feeding system on methane emissions from dairy systems , 2011 .

[85]  E. Dlugokencky,et al.  Global atmospheric methane: budget, changes and dangers , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[86]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Cost modelling for wastewater treatment processes , 2011 .

[87]  Lei Wang,et al.  Environmental impact of coal mine methane emissions and responding strategies in China , 2011 .

[88]  Chinese Dairy Farm Performance and Policy Implications in the New Millennium , 2011 .

[89]  R. Dhaked,et al.  Biomethanation under psychrophilic conditions. , 2010, Waste management.

[90]  M. Ince,et al.  Kinetic evaluation and performance of a mesophilic anaerobic contact reactor treating medium-strength food-processing wastewater. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[91]  L. Höglund Isaksson,et al.  Innovation effects of the Swedish NOx charge , 2010 .

[92]  K. Korkmaz,et al.  Continuous fermentative hydrogen production from cheese whey wastewater under thermophilic anaerobic conditions , 2009 .

[93]  E Debik,et al.  Use of the Static Granular Bed Reactor (SGBR) with anaerobic sludge to treat poultry slaughterhouse wastewater and kinetic modeling. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[94]  C. Buisman,et al.  Application of bacteria involved in the biological sulfur cycle for paper mill effluent purification. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[95]  D. Mackinnon Australian beef: financial performance of beef farms 2006-07 to 2008-09. , 2009 .

[96]  Alex Evans An Institutional Architecture for Climate Change A concept paper , 2009 .

[97]  B. Berglund Genetic improvement of dairy cow reproductive performance. , 2008, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[98]  I. Angelidaki,et al.  Influence of wastewater characteristics on methane potential in food-processing industry wastewaters. , 2008, Water research.

[99]  William Salas,et al.  Mitigation potential and costs for global agricultural greenhouse gas emissions , 2008 .

[100]  Thrassyvoulos Manios,et al.  Potential for methane production from typical Mediterranean agro-industrial by-products , 2008 .

[101]  David Kahan,et al.  Managing risk in farming , 2008 .

[102]  M G Healy,et al.  Treatment of dairy wastewater using constructed wetlands and intermittent sand filters. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[103]  Damià Barceló,et al.  Evaluation of the treatment efficiencies of paper mill whitewaters in terms of organic composition and toxicity. , 2007, Environmental pollution.

[104]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Long-term reduction potential of non-CO2 greenhouse gases , 2007 .

[105]  Grietje Zeeman,et al.  Effect of temperature on anaerobic treatment of black water in UASB-septic tank systems. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[106]  António G. Brito,et al.  Brewery and winery wastewater treatment : some focal points of design and operation , 2007 .

[107]  D. K. Lovett,et al.  A systems approach to quantify greenhouse gas fluxes from pastoral dairy production as affected by management regime , 2006 .

[108]  Fred N Kissell,et al.  Handbook for methane control in mining , 2006 .

[109]  J. Randerson,et al.  Global Fire Emissions Database, Version 4.1 (GFEDv4) , 2006 .

[110]  Kevin Maréchal,et al.  La lutte contre les changements climatiques , 2006 .

[111]  Mahmut Bayramoglu,et al.  Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewaters by electrocoagulation. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[112]  Jennica Kjällstrand,et al.  Low emissions from wood burning in an ecolabelled residential boiler , 2006 .

[113]  M. S. Andersen,et al.  Effectiveness of urban wastewater treatment policies in selected countries: an EEA pilot study , 2005 .

[114]  T Viraraghavan,et al.  Municipal solid waste management in Nepal: practices and challenges. , 2005, Waste management.

[115]  X. Zhan,et al.  Mixing Characteristics and Whey Wastewater Treatment of a Novel Moving Anaerobic Biofilm Reactor , 2004, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[116]  Jennica Kjällstrand,et al.  Chimney emissions from small-scale burning of pellets and fuelwood - examples referring to different combustion appliances , 2004 .

[117]  S Pacala,et al.  Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies , 2004, Science.

[118]  B. Leckner,et al.  Emission characteristics of modern and old-type residential boilers fired with wood logs and wood pellets , 2004 .

[119]  Kenya's Climate Change Technology Needs assessment Report, May 2004 - Prepared under the Auspices of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) - Review Editor. , 2004 .

[120]  NURI AZBAR,et al.  A Review of Waste Management Options in Olive Oil Production , 2004 .

[121]  R. Delmas An overview of present knowledge on methane emission from biomass burning , 1994, Fertilizer research.

[122]  G. Lettinga,et al.  Anaerobic digestion and wastewater treatment systems , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[123]  A. Ferrero,et al.  The sustainable development of rice-based production systems in Europe , 2004 .

[124]  C. Barrett,et al.  Better Technology, Better Plots, or Better Farmers? Identifying Changes in Productivity and Risk Among Malagasy Rice Farmers , 2004 .

[125]  H. Clark,et al.  Methane and climate change , 2002 .

[126]  G Lettinga,et al.  Challenge of psychrophilic anaerobic wastewater treatment. , 2001, Trends in biotechnology.

[127]  G Thompson,et al.  The treatment of pulp and paper mill effluent: a review. , 2001, Bioresource technology.

[128]  H. Shibayama Weeds and weed management in rice production in Japan , 2001 .

[129]  B. Bouman Water-efficient management strategies in rice production , 2001 .

[130]  G. Demirer,et al.  Sequential (anaerobic/aerobic) biological treatment of Dalaman SEKA pulp and paper industry effluent. , 2001, Waste management.

[131]  M. Blum,et al.  Anaerobic Treatment of Condensates: Trial at a Kraft Pulp and Paper Mill , 2001, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[132]  R. Stott,et al.  The World Bank , 2008, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[133]  Dc Washington,et al.  USEPA. Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): 738‐R‐99‐004. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (7508C): 337 pp. , 1999 .

[134]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change , 1998 .

[135]  M. R. Harrison,et al.  Estimate of methane emissions from the U.S. natural gas industry. , 1997, Chemosphere.

[136]  Organización de las Naciones Unidas United Nations framework convention on climate change , 1992 .

[137]  W. Baumol,et al.  The Use of Standards and Prices for Protection of the Environment , 1971 .

[138]  P. Derfler,et al.  The United States Department of Agriculture , 1872, Nature.