Properties of saccades generated as a choice response

Since Hick’s original description, many subsequent studies have confirmed the logarithmic relationship that exists between response time and the number of alternatives (NA) for a choice response. In the present study a novel paradigm was used to quantify saccade response time as a function of NA. Normal subjects were required to make a saccade to the remembered location of a visual target whose color was specified by a centrally located cue. The paradigm thus required a stimulus-response transformation similar to that used by Hick. The results show that, when such a transformation was required, a logarithmic relationship was found for saccadic response time. The use of a color-to-location paradigm to study saccade choice response time produced an unexpected additional result that may provide insight into the neural organization of the saccadic system. When the number of alternative choice responses was large (4 or 8), subjects frequently made a two-saccade response instead of a single saccade to the correct location. The first movement in such a sequence was in the correct direction, but was hypometric. A second movement then followed which moved the eyes onto the correct location. These results suggest dynamic dissociations in the mechanisms underlying the triggering of saccades and the specification of their metrics.

[1]  W. E. Hick Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[2]  R H Wurtz,et al.  Activity of neurons in monkey superior colliculus during interrupted saccades. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  The predictability of saccadic latency in a novel voluntary oculomotor task , 1980, Vision Research.

[4]  W H Teichner,et al.  Laws of visual choice reaction time. , 1974, Psychological review.

[5]  R. Walker,et al.  A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  R. E. Morin,et al.  INFORMATION AND REACTION TIME FOR "NAMING" RESPONSES. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[8]  S. Heywood,et al.  Structure of the Visual Array and Saccadic Latency: Implications for Oculomotor Control* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Hick's law in a stochastic race model with speed-accuracy tradeoffs , 2002 .

[10]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Fourth Purkinje image signals reveal eye-lens deviations and retinal image distortions during saccades , 1995, Vision Research.

[11]  Jeffrey D. Schall,et al.  Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  A. Fuchs,et al.  The brainstem burst generator for saccadic eye movements , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  D. Laming A new interpretation of the relation between choice-reaction time and the number of equiprobable alternatives. , 1966, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[14]  R. H. S. Carpenter,et al.  Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements , 1995, Nature.

[15]  B. Forrin,et al.  Mixing of two types of S-R associations in a choice reaction time task. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  M. A. Basso,et al.  Modulation of Neuronal Activity in Superior Colliculus by Changes in Target Probability , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  T. Mergner,et al.  What is pathological with gaze shift fragmentation in Parkinson's disease? , 2002, Journal of Neurology.

[18]  H D Crane,et al.  Generation-V dual-Purkinje-image eyetracker. , 1985, Applied optics.

[19]  A. T. Welford,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SENSORY-MOTOR PERFORMANCE : SURVEY AND REAPPRAISAL OF TWELVE YEARS' PROGRESS , 1960 .

[20]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Saccade-related activity in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of burst and buildup cells. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  J. A. Leonard Tactual Choice Reactions: I , 1959 .

[22]  D. Hubel,et al.  The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  L. Optican,et al.  Model of the control of saccades by superior colliculus and cerebellum. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  B A J Reddi,et al.  Accuracy, information, and response time in a saccadic decision task. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Robert G Pachella,et al.  The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research 1 , 1973, Human Information Processing.

[26]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Role of the caudal fastigial nucleus in saccade generation. I. Neuronal discharge pattern. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  W. Becker,et al.  An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli , 1979, Vision Research.

[28]  A. T. Welford,et al.  The fundamentals of skill , 1968 .

[29]  R. Hyman Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  Leanne Boucher,et al.  Saccades operate in violation of Hick’s law , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  David L. Sparks,et al.  Systematic errors for saccades to remembered targets: Evidence for a dissociation between saccade metrics and activity in the superior colliculus , 1994, Vision Research.

[32]  D. Sparks,et al.  Cerebellotectal pathways in the macaque: Implications for collicular generation of saccades , 1990, Neuroscience.

[33]  N J Gandhi,et al.  Endpoint accuracy in saccades interrupted by stimulation in the omnipause region in monkey , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[34]  E. Keller,et al.  Use of interrupted saccade paradigm to study spatial and temporal dynamics of saccadic burst cells in superior colliculus in monkey. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[36]  Yanning H. Han,et al.  Neuro-ophthalmology of late-onset Tay–Sachs disease (LOTS) , 2004, Neurology.

[37]  H. Noda,et al.  Afferent and efferent connections of the oculomotor region of the fastigial nucleus in the macaque monkey , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[38]  N. J. Gandhi,et al.  Two-dimensional saccade-related population activity in superior colliculus in monkey. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  R. Carpenter,et al.  The influence of urgency on decision time , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  A Wingfield,et al.  Response Latencies in Naming Objects , 1965, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[41]  Robert M. McPeek,et al.  Concurrent processing of saccades in visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[42]  Gunther Wyszecki,et al.  Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, 2nd Edition , 2000 .

[43]  S. Gielen,et al.  A quantitative analysis of generation of saccadic eye movements by burst neurons. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  R. Luce,et al.  Decision structure and time relations in simple choice behavior , 1956 .

[45]  Kaoru Yoshida,et al.  Saccade-related inhibitory input to pontine omnipause neurons: an intracellular study in alert cats. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.