The effects of schedule volatility on supply chain performance

Schedule volatility is an unfortunate fact of life facing most suppliers of both products and services. In this paper, we are concerned with establishing the magnitude of the problem faced and the resultant effects on supply chain performance. Empirical data collected from 59 value streams are statistically analysed to investigate the negative effects of volatile customer schedules on performance. The evidence has been acquired predominantly via the rigorous site-based Quick Scan Audit Methodology. For each value stream, the forecast error is evaluated, which confirms the excessive volatility of the orders placed by many customers. A comparison between the automotive and non-automotive supply chains is conducted to assess the generic nature of the resultant relationships. We have concluded that volatility is a universal problem not confined to particular industries. Hence it strengthens the viewpoint that solutions initially proposed for the automotive sector may well find successful application elsewhere.

[1]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  On the impact of order volatility in the European automotive sector , 2008 .

[2]  M. Jaksic,et al.  Bullwhip Effect in a Supply Chain , 2007 .

[3]  Paul Childerhouse,et al.  Enabling the seamless supply chain by exploiting the four smooth material flow controls , 2006 .

[4]  S. Disney,et al.  Schedule volatility in the European automotive sector , 2006 .

[5]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  Smooth is smart [automobile manufacturing] , 2006 .

[6]  S. Disney,et al.  On bullwhip in supply chains--historical review, present practice and expected future impact , 2006 .

[7]  E. Russell.  Coincidences, Chaos, and All That Math Jazz , 2006 .

[8]  Terry P. Harrison,et al.  Estimation in supply chain inventory management , 2006 .

[9]  S. Disney,et al.  Determination of when a little bullwhip may be helpful , 2005 .

[10]  Terry P. Harrison,et al.  The Bullwhip Effect—Impact of Stochastic Lead Time, Information Quality, and Information Sharing: A Simulation Study , 2004 .

[11]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  Reducing uncertainty in European supply chains , 2004 .

[12]  J. Parnaby,et al.  Managing by Projects for Business Success , 2003 .

[13]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  Simplified material flow holds the key to supply chain integration , 2003 .

[14]  M. Lambrecht,et al.  Transfer function analysis of forecasting induced bullwhip in supply chains , 2002 .

[15]  Mohamed Mohamed Naim,et al.  A supply chain diagnostic methodology: determining the vector of change , 2002 .

[16]  Michael Gilliland,et al.  New Approaches to "Unforecastable" Demand , 2001 .

[17]  J. Fransoo,et al.  Measuring the bullwhip effect in the supply chain , 2000 .

[18]  S. Spear,et al.  Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[19]  J. Holmström.  Product range management: a case study of supply chain operations in the European grocery industry , 1997 .

[20]  Richard D. Metters,et al.  Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains , 1997 .

[21]  D. Towill.  Time compression and supply chain management ‐ a guided tour , 1996 .

[22]  Alan Harrison,et al.  Themes for facilitating material flow in manufacturing systems , 1995 .

[23]  J. Parnaby,et al.  Systems engineering for better engineering , 1995 .

[24]  Paul H. Zipkin,et al.  Customer-order information, leadtimes, and inventories , 1995 .

[25]  Mohamed Mohamed Naim,et al.  Smoothing Supply Chain Dynamics , 1991 .

[26]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[27]  Dean H. Kropp,et al.  The New Manufacturing Challenge: Techniques for Continuous ImprovementThe New Manufacturing Challenge: Techniques for Continuous Improvement, by SuzakiKiyoshi. New York: Free Press, 1987, 270 pp., $24.95, cloth. , 1988 .

[28]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  Industrial dynamics model building of a close-coupled production-distribution system , 1988 .

[29]  J. Parnaby,et al.  A systems approach to the implementation of JIT methodologies in Lucas Industries , 1988 .

[30]  J. Parnaby,et al.  Concept of a manufacturing system , 1979 .

[31]  Frank Safayeni,et al.  Application of cybernetics to manufacturing flexibility: a systems perspective , 2006 .

[32]  Edward B. Burger.  Coincidences, Chaos, and All That Math Jazz , 2005 .

[33]  M. Lambrecht,et al.  Smooth is smart: Bullwhip, inventory, fill-rates and the golden ratio , 2005 .

[34]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota way : 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer , 2004 .

[35]  D. Lambert,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2003 .

[36]  J. Liker,et al.  Japanese automakers, U.S. suppliers and supply-chain superiority , 2001 .

[37]  L. Ervo.  Order for Payment , 2001 .

[38]  Peter McCullen,et al.  The Impact of Agile Manufacturing on Supply Chain Dynamics , 1999 .

[39]  John Micklethwait,et al.  The witch doctors : what the management gurus are saying, why it matters and how to make sense of it , 1996 .

[40]  Alan Harrison,et al.  An Investigation of the Impact of Schedule Stability on Supplier Responsiveness , 1996 .

[41]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Factory physics : foundations of manufacturing management , 1996 .

[42]  大野 耐一,et al.  Toyota production system : beyond large-scale production , 1988 .

[43]  洲崎 清,et al.  The new manufacturing challenge : techniques for continuous improvement , 1987 .

[44]  Elwood Spencer Buffa,et al.  Modern Production Management , 1969 .