Product attribute bullwhip in the technology planning process and a methodology to reduce it

This paper considers the upstream flow of product attribute forecast information often used to drive the technology planning process. It is noted that, while downstream customers are willing to pay for improvements in key product attributes, they do not always provide accurate and timely product attribute forecasts to upstream suppliers. As a result of this increasing distortion of product attribute demand as information flows upstream, upstream suppliers often either fail to develop technology that will be needed in the marketplace or develop technology that ultimately is unused. This is shown to be a strategic, technology planning analog to the tactical, order decision problem of order quantity bullwhip observed in the field of supply chain management. As such, we define the technology planning problem under consideration here as "product attribute bullwhip." Based on solutions employed to address order quantity bullwhip in supply chain management, we propose a methodology to reduce product attribute bullwhip by comparing product attribute information obtained directly from the end user with that which flows upstream through the supply chain. To illustrate this effect, we apply the proposed methodology to an example from the wireless communication industry by comparing trends in the perceived value of cellular telephone handset face area with trends in the perceived value of face area observed at the component level of the supply chain.

[1]  Fangruo Chen Decentralized supply chains subject to information delays , 1999 .

[2]  H. A. Lingstone,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[3]  Geoffrey A. Moore,et al.  Crossing the Chasm , 1991 .

[4]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[5]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[6]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  Science and technology roadmaps , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[7]  Yan Dong,et al.  TOWARDS BETTER COORDINATION OF THE SUPPLY CHAIN , 2001 .

[8]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[9]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Forecasting and Management of Technology , 1991 .

[10]  A. L. Frohman,et al.  Planning Tools for Effective Research Management in the '80s: Linking Technological and Business Planning , 1981 .

[11]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Technology Cycles, Innovation Streams and Ambidextrous Organizations , 1997 .

[12]  Vithala R. Rao,et al.  Conjoint Measurement- for Quantifying Judgmental Data , 1971 .

[13]  J. Sterman,et al.  Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future , 1992 .

[14]  P. Senge THE FIFTH DISCIPLINE , 1997 .

[15]  Stephen M. Millett,et al.  A manager's guide to technology forecasting and strategy analysis methods , 1991 .

[16]  Ajay K. Kohli,et al.  HOW DO THEY KNOW THEIR CUSTOMERS SO WELL , 2001 .

[17]  Richard N. Foster Timing Technological Transitions , 1986 .

[18]  Pieter Groenveld Roadmapping Integrates Business and Technology , 1997 .

[19]  Gina Colarelli O'Connor,et al.  The nature of market visioning for technology-based radical innovation , 2001 .

[20]  Richard D. Metters,et al.  Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains , 1997 .

[21]  M. Hitt,et al.  Technological learning, knowledge management, firm growth and performance: an introductory essay , 2000 .

[22]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[23]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[24]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[25]  James Rieser Bright,et al.  A Guide to practical technological forecasting , 1973 .

[26]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations , 1976 .

[27]  H. E. Cook,et al.  On system design , 1992 .

[28]  Joseph P. Martino,et al.  Technological forecasting for decision making , 1983 .

[29]  Joseph Paul Martino,et al.  Technological Forecasting for Decisionmaking , 1975 .

[30]  H. E. Cook Fundamentals of Value Benchmarking , 1996 .

[31]  D. Towill,et al.  Information enrichment: designing the supply chain for competitive advantage , 1997 .

[32]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  Forecasting micro electro mechanical systems: a disruptive innovation , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).

[33]  G. P. McConville,et al.  Evaluating Mail Survey Techniques for Determining the Value of Vehicle Options , 1997 .

[34]  H. Cook,et al.  Product management : value, quality, cost, price, profits, and organization , 1997 .

[35]  Robert W. Veryzer Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process , 1998 .

[36]  Charles H. Willyard,et al.  Motorola's Technology Roadmap Process , 1987 .

[37]  R. Galvin Science Roadmaps , 1998, Science.

[38]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[39]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .

[40]  J. Linton,et al.  Infrastructure for Emergent Industries Based on Discontinuous Innovations , 2000 .

[41]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  The seamless supply chain - the predator's strategic advantage , 1997 .

[42]  Elie Ofek,et al.  How Much Does the Market Value an Improvement in a Product Attribute , 2002 .

[43]  M. Pozar,et al.  On Determining the Relationship Between Vehicle Value and Interior Noise , 1998 .

[44]  Stephen M. Disney,et al.  The impact of information enrichment on the Bullwhip effect in supply chains: A control engineering perspective , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  C. A. Suárez,et al.  Sources of information used in new product and process technology planning within the electron device industry , 2002, IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.

[46]  R. Phaal,et al.  Characterisation of technology roadmaps: purpose and format , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).

[47]  T. D. Mast,et al.  Frequency dependence of speckle in continuous-wave ultrasound with implications for blood perfusion measurements , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[48]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[49]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Research issues in knowledge management and virtual collaboration in new product development: an introductory essay , 2003 .

[50]  R. Grant,et al.  Knowledge and the firm: Overview , 1996 .

[51]  R. Kapuściński,et al.  Value of Information in Capacitated Supply Chains , 1999 .

[52]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .