Parallel versus serial processing dependencies in the perisylvian speech network: A Granger analysis of intracranial EEG data

In this work, we apply Granger causality analysis to high spatiotemporal resolution intracranial EEG (iEEG) data to examine how different components of the left perisylvian language network interact during spoken language perception. The specific focus is on the characterization of serial versus parallel processing dependencies in the dominant hemisphere dorsal and ventral speech processing streams. Analysis of iEEG data from a large, 64-electrode grid implanted over the left perisylvian region in a single right-handed patient showed a consistent pattern of direct posterior superior temporal gyrus influence over sites distributed over the entire ventral pathway for words, non-words, and phonetically ambiguous items that could be interpreted either as words or non-words. For the phonetically ambiguous items, this pattern was overlayed by additional dependencies involving the inferior frontal gyrus, which influenced activation measured at electrodes located in both ventral and dorsal stream speech structures. Implications of these results for understanding the functional architecture of spoken language processing and interpreting the role of the posterior superior temporal gyrus in speech perception are discussed.

[1]  W. Ganong Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Hiroyuki Oya,et al.  Functional connections between auditory cortical fields in humans revealed by Granger causality analysis of intra-cranial evoked potentials to sounds: Comparison of two methods , 2007, Biosyst..

[4]  Emily B. Myers,et al.  An event-related fMRI investigation of phonological–lexical competition , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  A. Seth Causal connectivity of evolved neural networks during behavior. , 2005, Network.

[6]  Nathan E. Crone,et al.  Subdural electrodes , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[8]  P Kahane,et al.  Intracranial EEG and human brain mapping , 2003, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[9]  W. Marslen-Wilson Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[10]  Claude Alain,et al.  Assessing the auditory dual-pathway model in humans , 2004, NeuroImage.

[11]  Neurosciences,et al.  Organization of Visual Areas in Macaque and Human Cerebral Cortex , 2002 .

[12]  Vito Di Maio,et al.  Brain and vision , 2008, Brain Research.

[13]  Kayoko Okada,et al.  Identification of lexical–phonological networks in the superior temporal sulcus using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, Neuroreport.

[14]  J. Binder,et al.  The new neuroanatomy of speech perception. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  D. Hubel Eye, brain, and vision , 1988 .

[16]  Seppo P. Ahlfors,et al.  Lexical influences on speech perception: A Granger causality analysis of MEG and EEG source estimates , 2008, NeuroImage.

[17]  W. Singer,et al.  Testing non-linearity and directedness of interactions between neural groups in the macaque inferotemporal cortex , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  F Grosjean,et al.  Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[20]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Modeling variability in cortical representations of human complex sound perception , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Stephanie Clarke,et al.  Auditory Neglect: What and Where in Auditory Space , 2004, Cortex.

[22]  K. Lashley The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .

[23]  R. Näätänen The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[24]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Directed Cortical Information Flow during Human Object Recognition: Analyzing Induced EEG Gamma-Band Responses in Brain's Source Space , 2007, PloS one.

[25]  B. Gordon,et al.  Induced electrocorticographic gamma activity during auditory perception , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  W. Freeman,et al.  Spatio-temporal correlations in human gamma band electrocorticograms. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  C. Wernicke,et al.  The Symptom Complex of Aphasia , 1969 .

[28]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  High-Frequency γ-Band Activity in the Basal Temporal Cortex during Picture-Naming and Lexical-Decision Tasks , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Dual streams of auditory afferents target multiple domains in the primate prefrontal cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Interactive processes in speech perception: the TRACE model , 1986 .

[31]  Michael H Kohrman,et al.  ECoG gamma activity during a language task: differentiating expressive and receptive speech areas. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  Ernst Fernando Lopes Da Silva Niedermeyer,et al.  Electroencephalography, basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields , 1982 .

[33]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[34]  J. Martinerie,et al.  Statistical assessment of nonlinear causality: application to epileptic EEG signals , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  H. Duffau,et al.  White matter functional connectivity as an additional landmark for dominant temporal lobectomy , 2008, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[36]  D. Gow,et al.  Articulatory mediation of speech perception: A causal analysis of multi-modal imaging data , 2009, Cognition.

[37]  S. Blumstein,et al.  An Event-Related fMRI Investigation of Implicit Semantic Priming , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Emily B. Myers,et al.  An event-related fMRI investigation of phonological-lexical competition , 2004, Brain and Language.

[39]  W. Hesse,et al.  The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[40]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[41]  N. Barbaro,et al.  Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Word Processing in the Human Brain , 2007, Front. Neurosci..

[42]  S. Bressler,et al.  Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The cortical organization of speech processing , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  E. De Renzi,et al.  Auditory neglect. , 1989, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[46]  Peter König,et al.  On the directionality of cortical interactions studied by structural analysis of electrophysiological recordings , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[47]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Neuromagnetic Evidence for the Timing of Lexical Activation: An MEG Component Sensitive to Phonotactic Probability but Not to Neighborhood Density , 2002, Brain and Language.

[48]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language , 2004, Cognition.

[49]  Valerie A. Carr,et al.  Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Modality-Specific and Supramodal Word Processing , 2003, Neuron.

[50]  Sophie K. Scott,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing in speech perception , 2004, Cognition.

[51]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[52]  L. Chalupa,et al.  The visual neurosciences , 2004 .

[53]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .