Sex-biased dispersal in a rare butterfly and the implications for its conservation

[1]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Monographs in Population Biology , 2013 .

[2]  Emanuel A. Fronhofer,et al.  Why are metapopulations so rare? , 2012, Ecology.

[3]  J. Clobert,et al.  How is dispersal integrated in life histories: a quantitative analysis using butterflies. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[4]  N. Haddad,et al.  Combining Measures of Dispersal to Identify Conservation Strategies in Fragmented Landscapes , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[5]  M. Baguette,et al.  Species- and sex-specific adjustments of movement behavior to landscape heterogeneity in butterflies , 2011 .

[6]  J. Settele,et al.  Do all inter-patch movements represent dispersal? A mixed kernel study of butterfly mobility in fragmented landscapes. , 2011, The Journal of animal ecology.

[7]  M. Betts,et al.  Evidence for Mate Guarding Behavior in the Taylor’s Checkerspot Butterfly , 2011, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[8]  Z. Fric,et al.  Mark–recapture on large spatial scale reveals long distance dispersal in the Marsh Fritillary, Euphydryas aurinia , 2011 .

[9]  I. Hanski,et al.  Eco-evolutionary spatial dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  S. Nilsson,et al.  How Frequent is Metapopulation Structure among Butterflies in Grasslands? Occurrence Patterns in a Forest-Dominated Landscape in Southern Sweden , 2011 .

[11]  R. Dennis,et al.  Landscape scale conservation: resources, behaviour, the matrix and opportunities , 2011, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[12]  R. ffrench-Constant,et al.  Butterflies on the brink: habitat requirements for declining populations of the marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) in SW England , 2011, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[13]  I. Hanski,et al.  Flight metabolic rate has contrasting effects on dispersal in the two sexes of the Glanville fritillary butterfly , 2011, Oecologia.

[14]  F. Burel,et al.  Dispersal mood revealed by shifts from routine to direct flights in the meadow brown butterfly Maniola jurtina , 2010 .

[15]  I. Steffan‐Dewenter,et al.  Butterfly and plant specialists suffer from reduced connectivity in fragmented landscapes , 2010 .

[16]  Michel Baguette,et al.  A meta‐analysis of dispersal in butterflies , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[17]  Xiao-jun Yang,et al.  Foraging habitats and utilization distributions of Black-necked Cranes wintering at the Napahai Wetland, China , 2010 .

[18]  R. Martins,et al.  Nymphalid butterfly dispersal among forest fragments at Serra da Canastra National Park, Brazil , 2010, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[19]  Jason D. K. Dzurisin,et al.  Captive rearing of Puget blue butterflies (Icaricia icarioides blackmorei) and implications for conservation , 2009, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[20]  J. Settele,et al.  The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review , 2009, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[21]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  A framework for generating and analyzing movement paths on ecological landscapes , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  C. Schultz,et al.  Restoration, Reintroduction, and captive Propagation for at-risk Butterflies: A review of British and American Conservation Efforts , 2008 .

[23]  Á. Kőrösi,et al.  Restricted within-habitat movement and time-constrained egg laying of female Maculinea rebeli butterflies , 2008, Oecologia.

[24]  R. Buchholz.  Behavioural biology: an effective and relevant conservation tool. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  W. Smith,et al.  Estimated persistence of northern flying squirrel populations in temperate rain forest fragments of Southeast Alaska , 2007 .

[26]  D. Kramer,et al.  Mechanistic Home Range Analysis.Monographs in Population Biology, Volume 43.ByPaul R Moorcroftand, Mark A Lewis.Princeton (New Jersey): Princeton University Press.$85.00 (hardcover); $39.50 (paper). xiii + 172 p + 16 pl; ill.; index. ISBN: 0‐691‐00927‐9 (hc); 0‐691‐00928‐7 (pb). 2006. , 2007 .

[27]  J. Hanula,et al.  Observations of Speyeria diana (Diana Fritillary) Utilizing Forested Areas in North Carolina that have been Mechanically Thinned and Burned , 2007 .

[28]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  LoCoH: Nonparameteric Kernel Methods for Constructing Home Ranges and Utilization Distributions , 2007, PloS one.

[29]  Erik Öckinger,et al.  Do corridors promote dispersal in grassland butterflies and other insects? , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  P. Sjögren-Gulve,et al.  Limited dispersal by the rare scarce heath butterfly—potential consequences for population persistence , 2007, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[31]  P. Moorcroft,et al.  Mechanistic home range analysis , 2006 .

[32]  Nicolas Schtickzelle,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics and conservation of the marsh fritillary butterfly: Population viability analysis and management options for a critically endangered species in Western Europe , 2005 .

[33]  Marc Bélisle,et al.  MEASURING LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: THE CHALLENGE OF BEHAVIORAL LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY , 2005 .

[34]  Derek W. Stinson,et al.  DRAFT WASHINGTON STATE STATUS REPORT FOR THE MAZAMA POCKET GOPHER, STREAKED HORNED LARK, AND TAYLOR'S CHECKERSPOT , 2005 .

[35]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  A local nearest-neighbor convex-hull construction of home ranges and utilization distributions , 2004 .

[36]  G. Lei,et al.  Contrasting movement patterns in two species of chequerspot butterflies, Euphydryas aurinia and Melitaea phoebe, in the same patch network , 2004 .

[37]  Andrew S. Pullin,et al.  Persistence of species in a fragmented urban landscape: the importance of dispersal ability and habitat availability for grassland butterflies , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[38]  M. Konvička,et al.  Population Structure, Behaviour and Selection of Oviposition Sites of an Endangered Butterfly, Parnassius Mnemosyne, in Litovelské Pomoravíl. Czech Republic , 1999, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[39]  Jan Landin,et al.  Population structure and movements of a threatened butterfly (Lopinga achine) in a fragmented landscape in Sweden , 2002 .

[40]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly , 2002 .

[41]  Karl-Olof Bergman.  Population dynamics and the importance of habitat management for conservation of the butterfly Lopinga achine , 2001 .

[42]  P. Doak,et al.  POPULATION CONSEQUENCES OF RESTRICTED DISPERSAL FOR AN INSECT HERBIVORE IN A SUBDIVIDED HABITAT , 2000 .

[43]  N. Perrin,et al.  Local Competition, Inbreeding, and the Evolution of Sex‐Biased Dispersal , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[44]  D. Boughton.  Empirical evidence for complex source-sink dynamics with alternative states in a butterfly metapopulation , 1999 .

[45]  I. Hanski,et al.  Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation , 1998, Nature.

[46]  C. Schultz,et al.  Dispersal Behavior and Its Implications for Reserve Design in a Rare Oregon Butterfly , 1998 .

[47]  I. Hanski.  Metapopulation dynamics , 1998, Nature.

[48]  W. Irvin.  Endangered species act. , 1993, Science.

[49]  R. Iman,et al.  Rank Transformations as a Bridge between Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics , 1981 .

[50]  James A. Scott,et al.  Mate-locating behavior of butterflies , 1974 .

[51]  G. S. Watson,et al.  Statistical methods for the analysis of problems in animal orientation and certain biological rhythms , 1966 .