Blast Mitigation in a Sandwich Composite Using Graded Core and Polyurea Interlayer

The dynamic behavior of two types of sandwich composites made of E-Glass Vinyl-Ester (EVE) facesheets and Corecell™ A-series foam with a polyurea interlayer was studied using a shock tube apparatus. The materials, as well as the core layer arrangements, were identical, with the only difference arising in the location of the polyurea interlayer. The foam core itself was layered with monotonically increasing wave impedance of the core layers, with the lowest wave impedance facing the shock loading. For configuration 1, the polyurea interlayer was placed behind the front facesheet, in front of the foam core, while in configuration 2 it was placed behind the foam core, in front of the back facesheet. A high-speed side-view camera, along with a high-speed back-view 3-D Digital Image Correlation (DIC) system, was utilized to capture the real time deformation process as well as mechanisms of failure. Post mortem analysis was also carried out to evaluate the overall blast performance of these two configurations. The results indicated that applying polyurea behind the foam core and in front of the back facesheet will reduce the back face deflection, particle velocity, and in-plane strain, thus improving the overall blast performance and maintaining structural integrity.

[1]  G. Dvorak,et al.  A blast-tolerant sandwich plate design with a polyurea interlayer , 2006 .

[2]  M. J. Forrestal,et al.  A split Hopkinson bar technique for low-impedance materials , 1999 .

[3]  Arun Shukla,et al.  Analytical and experimental evaluation of energies during shock wave loading , 2010 .

[4]  David R Hayhurst,et al.  The response of metallic sandwich panels to water blast , 2007 .

[5]  Srinivasan Arjun Tekalur,et al.  Blast resistance of polyurea based layered composite materials , 2008 .

[6]  B. Sankar,et al.  Low-velocity impact response of sandwich beams with functionally graded core , 2006 .

[7]  S. Nemat-Nasser,et al.  Numerical modeling of effect of polyurea on response of steel plates to impulsive loads in direct pressure-pulse experiments , 2010 .

[8]  S. Nemat-Nasser,et al.  Investigation of effect of polyurea on response of steel plates to impulsive loads in direct pressure-pulse experiments , 2010 .

[9]  Arun Shukla,et al.  The blast resistance of sandwich composites with stepwise graded cores , 2009 .

[10]  S. Nemat-Nasser,et al.  Experimental investigation of response of monolithic and bilayer plates to impulsive loads , 2010 .

[11]  K. T. Ramesh,et al.  Dynamic characterization of layered and graded structures under impulsive loading , 2001 .

[12]  S. Nemat-Nasser,et al.  Numerical modeling of response of monolithic and bilayer plates to impulsive loads , 2010 .

[13]  N. Fleck,et al.  The Resistance of Clamped Sandwich Beams to Shock Loading , 2004 .

[14]  Vikram Deshpande,et al.  The impulsive response of sandwich beams: analytical and numerical investigation of regimes of behaviour , 2006 .

[15]  Zhenyu Xue,et al.  Preliminary assessment of sandwich plates subject to blast loads , 2003 .

[16]  M. S. Fatt,et al.  Blast Response of Walls Retrofitted with Elastomer Coatings , 2004 .

[17]  C. M. Roland,et al.  High strain rate mechanical behavior of polyurea , 2007 .

[18]  S. Nemat-Nasser,et al.  An experimentally-based viscoelastic constitutive model for polyurea, including pressure and temperature effects , 2006 .

[19]  Haydn N. G. Wadley,et al.  Mechanical response of metallic honeycomb sandwich panel structures to high-intensity dynamic loading , 2008 .

[20]  Mary C. Boyce,et al.  Large deformation rate-dependent stress–strain behavior of polyurea and polyurethanes , 2006 .