Predicating team performance in technology industry: Theoretical aspects of social identity and self-regulation

Abstract The technology industry environment has been so complex that oftentimes only effective and well-coordinated work teams can efficiently detect, assess, and deal with the drastic changes of such environment. This study develops a research model based on the theories of social identity and self-regulation to forecast team performance in order to understand the interrelations between social, emotional, and motivational factors of teams in technology industry. In the model, team performance is influenced indirectly by goal commitment, emotional intelligence, and teamwork interdependence via the full mediation of team planning and team identity. At the same time, the effects of team planning and team identity on team performance are hypothetically moderated by goal commitment. Empirical testing of this model, by investigating team personnel in high-tech firms from technology industry, confirms the applicability of team planning and team identity as dual mediators among these work teams. The managerial implications and research limitations based on the empirical findings herein are provided.

[1]  Anthony P. Ammeter,et al.  EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE, LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS, AND TEAM OUTCOMES , 2003 .

[2]  Chi-Sum Wong,et al.  The construct and criterion validity of emotional intelligence and its potential utility for management studies. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[4]  Anu Sivunen,et al.  Strengthening Identification with the Team in Virtual Teams: The Leaders' Perspective , 2006 .

[5]  Ann L. Brown Learning, remembering, and understanding , 1982 .

[6]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[7]  Merideth Ferguson The Role of Group Membership Perception and Team Identity in a Virtual Team's Use of Influence Tactics , 2004 .

[8]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Social capital and cooperative behavior in the workplace: a social identity perspective , 2006 .

[9]  David R. Mackay,et al.  Managerial hyperopia: A potential unintended consequence of foresight in a top management team? , 2015 .

[10]  G. Marwell,et al.  THE PARADOX OF GROUP SIZE IN COLLECTIVE ACTION: A THEORY OF THE CRITICAL MASS. II. * , 1988 .

[11]  K. E. Barron,et al.  Testing Moderator and Mediator Effects in Counseling Psychology Research. , 2004 .

[12]  Charmine E. J. Härtel,et al.  How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams , 2002 .

[13]  A. Somech,et al.  Team conflict management and team effectiveness: the effects of task interdependence and team identification , 2009 .

[14]  K. Bezrukova,et al.  A field study of group diversity, workgroup context, and performance , 2004 .

[15]  Nicky James,et al.  Emotional Labour: Skill and Work in the Social Regulation of Feelings , 1989 .

[16]  Y. Baruch,et al.  All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance , 2012 .

[17]  Hwa-Chun Ma,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change Group social capital in virtual teaming contexts : A moderating role of positive affective tone in knowledge sharing , 2014 .

[18]  E. V. Schie,et al.  Foci and correlates of organizational identification , 2000 .

[19]  M. West Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups , 2002 .

[20]  M. A. Campion,et al.  A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and changing process , 1982 .

[21]  M. Wilson,et al.  Putting the "Team" into Teamwork: Alternative Theoretical Contributions for Contemporary Management Practice , 1998 .

[22]  R. Liden,et al.  Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: an examination of goal and process clarity and servant leadership. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[24]  Miriam Erez,et al.  Effect of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal difficulty to performance , 1984 .

[25]  Elizabeth V. Hobman,et al.  The Role of Team Identification in the Dissimilarity-Conflict Relationship , 2006 .

[26]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  The context and content of social identity threat , 1999 .

[27]  Chieh-Peng Lin,et al.  Modeling the relationship between IT-mediated social capital and social support: Key mediating mechanisms of sense of group , 2012 .

[28]  Amanda K. Emo,et al.  Emotional intelligence, personality, and task-induced stress. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[29]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2000 .

[30]  Caroline A. Bartel,et al.  Talking about time: Effects of temporal planning and time awareness norms on group coordination and performance. , 2003 .

[31]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Motivations in Open Source Software Communities: The Mediating Role of Effort Intensity and Goal Commitment , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[32]  Benson Rosen,et al.  Virtual team effectiveness: a proposed research agenda , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[33]  Holly Arrow,et al.  A Tripartite Model of Group Identification , 1999 .

[34]  J. George Emotions and Leadership: The Role of Emotional Intelligence , 2000 .

[35]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment in the workplace: toward a general model , 2001 .

[36]  Eleanor M. Smith,et al.  Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer , 1998 .

[37]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[38]  R. Liden,et al.  Perceived Organizational Support And Leader-Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective , 1997 .

[39]  Jennifer S. Beer,et al.  Prefrontal involvement in the regulation of emotion: convergence of rat and human studies , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[40]  Daphna Oyserman,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Regulation , 2007 .

[41]  D. Goleman,et al.  The emotionally intelligent workplace : how to select for, measure, and improve emotional intelligence in individuals, groups, and organizations , 2001 .

[42]  G. V. D. Vegt,et al.  Informational Dissimilarity and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Role of Intrateam Interdependence and Team Identification , 2003 .

[43]  Jaclyn M. Jensen,et al.  Developing adaptive teams: A theory of dynamic team leadership , 2009 .

[44]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  The effects of job complexity and autonomy on cohesiveness in collectivistic and individualistic work groups: a cross‐cultural analysis , 2003 .

[45]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  Self-Consciousness and Social Identity: Self-Regulation as a Group Member , 1989 .

[46]  Suzanne Zivnuska,et al.  Understanding the relationship between individualism–collectivism and team performance through an integration of social identity theory and the social relations model , 2006 .

[47]  E. Weldon,et al.  Processes that mediate the relationship between a group goal and improved group performance. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  Investigation of the construct validity of a self-report measure of goal commitment , 1989 .

[49]  Jun-You Lin Effects on diversity of R&D sources and human capital on industrial performance , 2014 .

[50]  Gerard H. Seijts,et al.  The Construct of Goal Commitment: Measurement And Relationships with Task Performance , 2000 .

[51]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Goals as Excuses or Guides: The Liberating Effect of Perceived Goal Progress on Choice , 2005 .

[52]  D. Wu,et al.  Modeling technological innovation risks of an entrepreneurial team using system dynamics: An agent-based perspective , 2010 .

[53]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  The Assessment of Goal Commitment: A Measurement Model Meta-Analysis. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[54]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[55]  D. Abrams Social identity, social cognition, and the self: The flexibility and stability of self-categorization. , 1999 .

[56]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Diversity, Social Indentity, and Performance: Emergent Social Dynamics in Cross-functional Teams , 1995 .

[57]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[58]  Cherng G. Ding,et al.  Exploring team performance in high-tech industries: Future trends of building up teamwork , 2015 .

[59]  H. Tajfel Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[60]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting theory. , 2012 .

[61]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[62]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[63]  R. DeShon,et al.  A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[64]  L. James Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[65]  Bradley J. Alge,et al.  Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: conceptual clarification and empirical synthesis. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[66]  Chieh-Peng Lin,et al.  Modeling team performance and its determinants in high-tech industries: Future trends of virtual teaming , 2014 .

[67]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Managing Diversity by Creating Team Identity , 2005 .

[68]  Anita M. M. Liu,et al.  A research model of project complexity and goal commitment effects on project outcome , 1999 .

[69]  S. Jackson,et al.  Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. , 1991 .

[70]  M. Hidalgo,et al.  PLACE ATTACHMENT AND PLACE IDENTITY IN NATIVES AND NON-NATIVES , 2007 .

[71]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[72]  M. Kiggundu Task interdependence and job design: test of a theory. , 1983, Organizational behavior and human performance.

[73]  P. Osseweijer,et al.  Improving industrial R&D practices with social and ethical aspects: Aligning key performance indicators with social and ethical aspects in food technology R&D , 2014 .

[74]  Daniel J. Brass Structural Relationships, Job Characteristics, and Worker Satisfaction and Performance. , 1981 .

[75]  Harold F. O'Neil,et al.  Construct validation of a trait self-regulation model , 2001 .

[76]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[77]  M. Landen Emotion management: dabbling in mystery - white witchcraft or black art? , 2002 .

[78]  Y. Theodorakis The influence of goals, commitment, self-efficacy and self-satisfaction on motor performance , 1996 .

[79]  J. Schaubroeck,et al.  Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[80]  J. Hollenbeck,et al.  Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Problems, prospects, and proposals for future research. , 1987 .

[81]  Olivier Serrat Understanding and Developing Emotional Intelligence , 2017 .

[82]  E. A. Locke Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives , 1968 .

[83]  Jixia Yang,et al.  Decoupling task and relationship conflict: the role of intragroup emotional processing , 2004 .

[84]  Vincent Rousseau,et al.  Team Goal Commitment and Team Effectiveness: The Role of Task Interdependence and Supportive Behaviors , 2005 .

[85]  H. S. Feild,et al.  Team Goal Orientation and Team Performance: The Mediating Role of Team Planning , 2009 .

[86]  Donald J. Campbell,et al.  The interactive effects of task complexity and participation on task performance: A field experiment , 1986 .