Probabilistic Reasoning as a General Unifying Tool

Our starting point is the approach to probabilistic logic through coherence; but we give up de Finetti's idea of a conditional event E\H being a 3-valued entity, with the third value being just an undetermined common value for all ordered pairs (E,H). We let instead the "third" value of E\H suitably depend on the given pair. In this way we get, through a direct assignment of conditional probability, a general theory of probabilistic reasoning able to encompass other approaches to uncertain reasoning, such as fuzziness and default reasoning. We are also able to put forward a meaningful concept of conditional independence, which avoids many of the usual inconsistencies related to logical dependence. We give an example in which we put together different kinds of information and show how coherent conditional probability can act as a unifying tool.

[1]  K. Upton,et al.  A modern approach , 1995 .

[2]  Peter Haddawy,et al.  Anytime Deduction for Probabilistic Logic , 1994, Artif. Intell..

[3]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Uncertainty in Intelligent Systems , 1993 .

[4]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[5]  P. Krauss,et al.  Representation of conditional probability measures on Boolean algebras , 1968 .

[6]  B. O. Koopman The bases of probability , 1940 .

[7]  Raymond Reiter,et al.  A Logic for Default Reasoning , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[8]  Giulianella Coletti,et al.  Conditional subjective probability and fuzzy theory , 1999, 18th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPS (Cat. No.99TH8397).

[9]  Nils J. Nilsson,et al.  Probabilistic Logic Revisited , 1993, Artif. Intell..

[10]  R. Scozzafava,et al.  Fuzzy sets as conditional probabilities: which meaningful operations can be defined? , 2001, Proceedings Joint 9th IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference (Cat. No. 01TH8569).

[11]  A. Dawid Conditional Independence in Statistical Theory , 1979 .

[12]  William Harper Rational Belief Change, Popper Functions and Counterfactuals , 1975 .

[13]  Romano Scozzafava,et al.  The role of coherence in eliciting and handling imprecise probabilities and its application to medical diagnosis , 2000, Inf. Sci..

[14]  Prakash P. Shenoy,et al.  On Spohn's rule for revision of beliefs , 1991, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[15]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[16]  Nils J. Nilsson,et al.  Probabilistic Logic * , 2022 .

[17]  Wolfgang Spohn,et al.  On the Properties of Conditional Independence , 1994 .

[18]  L. Dubins Finitely Additive Conditional Probabilities, Conglomerability and Disintegrations , 1975 .

[19]  Giulianella Coletti,et al.  Zero probabilities in stochastic independence , 2000 .

[20]  Wolfgang Spohn,et al.  Ranking Functions, AGM Style , 1999 .

[21]  Giulianella Coletti,et al.  Conditioning and inference in intelligent systems , 1999, Soft Comput..

[22]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Qualitative Probabilities for Default Reasoning, Belief Revision, and Causal Modeling , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[23]  J. N. R. Jeffers,et al.  Graphical Models in Applied Multivariate Statistics. , 1990 .

[24]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1959 .

[25]  Giulianella Coletti,et al.  Conditional Events with Vague Information in Expert Systems , 1990, IPMU.

[26]  Romano Scozzafava,et al.  Characterization of coherent Conditional Probabilities as a Tool for their Assessment and Extension , 1996, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[27]  A. Rényi,et al.  On Conditional Probability Spaces Generated by a Dimensionally Ordered Set of Measures , 1956 .

[28]  Eugenio Regazzini,et al.  Finitely additive conditional probabilities , 1985 .

[29]  R. Scozzafava,et al.  Le probabilità condizionate coerenti nei sistemi esperti , 1988 .