CEO Tenure and R&D Investment

This study examines the curvilinear CEO tenure–R&D investment relationship and the moderating influence of board capital on this relationship, thus making two major contributions. First, the finding of an inverted-U CEO tenure–R&D investment relationship enriches our understanding of how the CEO life cycle affects corporate investment decisions, particularly R&D. Second, the evidence of positive moderating effects of board human and social capital suggests that boards affect managerial choices through their human and social capital, thereby providing insight into how boards influence CEOs’ decision-making capabilities and, consequently, their R&D investment decisions. One important implication is that to encourage CEOs to invest in R&D, shareholders in the electronics industry and firms competing in innovation through R&D spending may consider appointing more directors with greater human and social capital to the Board because they will provide CEOs with ongoing advice and essential resources for R&D. The implications for strategy consultants are also discussed.

[1]  Vincent L. Barker,et al.  The Influence of CEO Tenure and Attitude Toward Change on Organizational Approaches to Innovation , 2010 .

[2]  J. Park,et al.  CEO Decision Horizon and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2008 .

[3]  D. Hambrick,et al.  The seasons of a CEO's tenure. , 1991, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[4]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Theoretical and methodological considerations in the age-job satisfaction relationship , 1989 .

[5]  R. Lensink,et al.  Do Powerful CEOs Determine Microfinance Performance? , 2012 .

[6]  Dominant CEO, Deviant Strategy, and Extreme Performance: The Moderating Role of a Powerful Board , 2011 .

[7]  Danny Miller,et al.  LEARNING ACROSS THE LIFE CYCLE: EXPERIMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE AMONG THE HOLLYWOOD STUDIO HEADS. , 1999 .

[8]  A. Hillman,et al.  Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives , 2003 .

[9]  N. Rajagopalan,et al.  The effects of board human and social capital on investor reactions to new CEO selection , 2011 .

[10]  Murali Jagannathan,et al.  Too Busy to Mind the Business? Monitoring by Directors with Multiple Board Appointments , 2002 .

[11]  Chun-nan Chen,et al.  Financing Constraints, Ownership Control, and Cross-Border M&As: Evidence from Nine East Asian Economies , 2009 .

[12]  Paul Matthyssens,et al.  Top Management Team Functional Diversity and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of CEO Characteristics , 2010 .

[13]  T. Dalziel,et al.  An Integrated Agency-Resource Dependence View of the Influence of Directors' Human and Relational Capital on Firms' R&D Spending , 2011 .

[14]  Edward Levitas,et al.  CEO Tenure And Company Invention Under Differing Levels of Technological Dynamism , 2005 .

[15]  R. Dewar,et al.  Elite Values Versus Organizational Structure in Predicting Innovation , 1973 .

[16]  U. Daellenbach,et al.  Commitment to Innovation: The Impact of Top Management Team Characteristics , 1999 .

[17]  Chwo-Ming Joseph Yu,et al.  The impact of internationalisation and proprietary assets on firm performance: an empirical analysis of Taiwanese high-tech firms , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[18]  M. Hitt,et al.  Strategic Control Systems And Relative R&D Investment , 1988 .

[19]  Hsiang-Lan Chen,et al.  Family Ownership, Board Independence, and R&D Investment , 2009 .

[20]  A. Shenhar,et al.  Risk Management, Project Success, and Technological Uncertainty , 2002 .

[21]  Isaac Fox,et al.  Asset specificity, firm heterogeneity and capital structure , 1993 .

[22]  M. Firth,et al.  Can corporate governance deter management from manipulating earnings? Evidence from related-party sales transactions in China , 2010 .

[23]  Capital structure, product differentiation and monopoly power: a panel method approach , 2002 .

[24]  D. De Clercq,et al.  Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study , 2004 .

[25]  Malcolm Higgs,et al.  The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Leadership and Narcissism , 2009 .

[26]  C. Hill,et al.  Are institutional investors myopic? A time‐series study of four technology‐driven industries , 1991 .

[27]  Michael Maccoby,et al.  Narcissistic Leaders The Incredible Pros, the Inevitable Cons , 2004 .

[28]  David J. Miller,et al.  How quickly do CEOs become obsolete? Industry dynamism, CEO tenure, and company performance , 2006 .

[29]  A. Hillman,et al.  The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change , 2010 .

[30]  Y. Kor,et al.  Experience-Based Human Capital and Social Capital of Outside Directors , 2008 .

[31]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  IS CEO PAY IN HIGH-TECHNOLOGY FIRMS RELATED TO INNOVATION? , 2000 .

[32]  Carmen Barroso Castro,et al.  Does the Team Leverage the Board's Decisions? , 2009 .

[33]  Martina Musteen,et al.  CEO attributes associated with attitude toward change: The direct and moderating effects of CEO tenure , 2006 .

[34]  Beverley Jackling,et al.  Board Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from India's Top Companies , 2009 .

[35]  Garry D. Bruton,et al.  The Resource Dependence, Service and Control Functions of Boards of Directors in Hong Kong and Taiwanese Firms , 2001 .

[36]  John E. Prescott,et al.  The strategic role of the board: The impact of board structure on top management team strategic action capability , 2009 .

[37]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Network Learning: The Effects of Partners' Heterogeneity of Experience on Corporate Acquisitions , 2002 .

[38]  Yasemin Y. Kor,et al.  Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy , 2006 .

[39]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  The differing effects of agent and founder CEOs on the firm's market expansion , 2012 .

[40]  David J. Miller,et al.  Stale in the Saddle: CEO Tenure and the Match Between Organization and Environment , 1991 .

[41]  Jonathan L. Johnson,et al.  Sources of CEO Power and Firm Financial Performance: A Longitudinal Assessment: , 1997 .

[42]  Vincent L. Barker,et al.  CEO Commitment to the Status Quo: Replication and Extension Using Content Analysis , 2010 .

[43]  Charles P. Himmelberg,et al.  R&D and internal finance: a panel study of small firms in high-tech industries , 1994 .

[44]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Effects Of Acquisitions on R&D Inputs and Outputs , 1991 .

[45]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[46]  H. Greve.  A Behavioral Theory of R&D Expenditures and Innovations: Evidence from Shipbuilding , 2003 .

[47]  Rafael Wittek,et al.  Structural Holes , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[48]  Wen-Ting Lin,et al.  Corporate elite characteristics and firm's internationalization: CEO-level and TMT-level roles , 2009 .

[49]  E. Fong.  Relative CEO Underpayment and CEO Behaviour Towards R&D Spending , 2010 .

[50]  Vincent L. Barker,et al.  CEO Characteristics and Firm R&D Spending , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[51]  Deepak K. Datta,et al.  CEO Experiences: Effects on the Choice of FDI Entry Mode , 2006 .

[52]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  Age and Work Performance in Nonmanagerial Jobs: The Effects of Experience and Occupational Type , 1990 .

[53]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  The Strategic Context Of External Network Ties: Examining The Impact Of Director Appointments On Board Involvement In Strategic Decision Making , 2001 .

[54]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[55]  Wann‐Yih Wu,et al.  Promoting Innovation through the Accumulation of Intellectual Capital, Social Capital, and Entrepreneurial Orientation , 2008 .

[56]  Mark A. Mone,et al.  Organizational Decline and Innovation: A Contingency Framework , 1998 .

[57]  K. Palepu.  Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure , 1985 .

[58]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[59]  Michael C. Sturman,et al.  Searching for the Inverted U-Shaped Relationship Between Time and Performance: Meta-Analyses of the Experience/Performance, Tenure/Performance, and Age/Performance Relationships , 2003 .

[60]  Tracy Noga,et al.  Do Corporate Governance Characteristics Influence Tax Management , 2010 .

[61]  Jonathan O'Brien,et al.  The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation , 2003 .

[62]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  CEO tenure and organizational performance: an intervening model , 2007 .

[63]  Marguerite Schneider,et al.  Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers , 2006 .

[64]  H. Chiang,et al.  Board Supervision Capability and Information Transparency , 2010 .

[65]  J. Porras,et al.  Vision Change in a Governmental R&D Organization , 2006 .

[66]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[67]  Joakim Wincent,et al.  Does network board capital matter? A study of innovative performance in strategic SME networks , 2010 .

[68]  D. Samson,et al.  Appropriating the Value from Innovation: Inimitability and the Effectiveness of Isolating Mechanisms , 2012 .

[69]  Bruce A. Walters,et al.  Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes , 2008 .

[70]  S. Harris,et al.  Creating Readiness for Organizational Change , 1993 .

[71]  M. Mizruchi.  What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates , 1996 .

[72]  Hsiang‐Lan Chen,et al.  Employee stock ownership and corporate R&D expenditures: evidence from Taiwan's information-technology industry , 2006 .

[73]  Paul D. Thistle,et al.  CEO tenure, the risk of termination and firm value , 2009 .

[74]  Kevin J. Murphy,et al.  Performance Pay and Top Management Incentives , 1990 .

[75]  Wei Shen,et al.  The Dynamics of the Ceo-Board Relationship: An Evolutionary Perspective , 2003 .

[76]  O. Richard,et al.  The impact of entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance: the role of CEO position tenure and industry tenure , 2009 .