Subsurface Water Retention Technology Improves Root Zone Water Storage for Corn Production on Coarse‐Textured Soils

Subsurface water retention technology (SWRT) is a new, long‐term approach developed to improve water storage capacities of sandy soils for sustainable crop production. It consists of subsurface polyethylene membranes installed within the soil profile that prevent the loss of irrigation water via deep percolation. Our objective was to identify membrane shape and placement to maximize the reduction in irrigation losses. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to measure the distribution of water in a surface‐irrigated sand lysimeter with six membranes of different geometry installed at four depths. The HYDRUS‐2D model was calibrated using soil water content data to estimate water losses from four soils modified with SWRT membranes. Membranes with 2:1, 3:1, and 5:1 aspect ratios installed at the 20‐ and 40‐cm depths in sand, sandy loam, loamy sand, and sandy loam soils were used in the simulations. Different vertical and horizontal alignments were also tested for the 2:1 membrane aspect ratio. The HYDRUS‐2D model adequately described the dynamics of water content measured in the lysimeter experiment. The simulation results showed that the highest reductions in water loss for most studied soil textures were achieved with a 2:1 aspect ratio membrane installed at the 20‐cm depth. The SWRT was sensitive to excessive irrigation, and its performance declined rapidly in response to overirrigation. Our modeling results demonstrated a high potential for the SWRT to reduce water losses from the plant root zone. Further testing of membrane performance is needed for different crops in real soils across a range of different climates.

[1]  B. Basso,et al.  Development of a new long-term drought resilient soil water retention technology , 2014, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[2]  A. Alazba,et al.  HYDRUS simulations of the effects of dual-drip subsurface irrigation and a physical barrier on water movement and solute transport in soils , 2014, Irrigation Science.

[3]  K. Demirel,et al.  Effect of soil water retention barriers on turfgrass growth and soil water content , 2013, Irrigation Science.

[4]  N. Lazarovitch,et al.  An artificial capillary barrier to improve root zone conditions for horticultural crops: physical effects on water content , 2010, Irrigation Science.

[5]  S. M. Ismail,et al.  Improvement of crop yield, soil moisture distribution and water use efficiency in sandy soils by clay application , 2007 .

[6]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  One‐, two‐, and three‐dimensional root water uptake functions for transient modeling , 2001 .

[7]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  Calibration of a two-dimensional root water uptake model , 2001 .

[8]  L. Zibilske Handbook of Soil Conditioners: Substances That Enhance the Physical Properties of Soil , 1998 .

[9]  Y. D. Malach,et al.  Use of an hydrophilic polymer to improve water storage and availability to crops grown in sand dunes I. Corn irrigated by trickling , 1993 .

[10]  Y. D. Malach,et al.  Use of an hydrophilic polymer to improve water storage and availability to crops grown in sand dunes II. Cabbage irrigated by sprinkling with different water salinities , 1993 .

[11]  K. C. Taylor,et al.  The Effect of Hydrophilic Polymer on Media Water Retention and Nutrient Availability to Ligustrum lucidum , 1986, HortScience.

[12]  J. P. Gupta Moisture and thermal regimes of the desert soils of Rajasthan, India, and their management for higher plant production , 1986 .

[13]  D. L. Nofziger,et al.  Super Slurper Effects on Crust Strength, Water Retention, and Water Infiltration of Soils1 , 1981 .

[14]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[15]  J. P. Gupta,et al.  Use of an asphalt subsurface barrier for improving the productivity of desert sandy soils , 1980 .

[16]  D. E. Miller Effect of H-SPAN on Water Retained by Soils After Irrigation1 , 1979 .

[17]  Y. Mualem A New Model for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity , 1976 .

[18]  S. Varade,et al.  Influence of Subsurface Barrier on Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake, and Water Requirement of Rice (Oryza sativa) 1 , 1972 .

[19]  L. C. Hammond,et al.  Effect of an Asphalt Barrier on Soil Water and on Yields and Water Use By Tomato and Cabbage1,2 , 1971, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[20]  L. C. Hammond,et al.  Yields and water-use efficiency of vegetables as influenced by a soil moisture barrier. , 1970 .

[21]  A. E. Erickson,et al.  Use of Asphalt to Increase Water-Holding Capacity of Droughty Sand Soils , 1969 .

[22]  J. Šimůnek,et al.  Numerical investigation of irrigation scheduling based on soil water status , 2011, Irrigation Science.

[23]  Joe T. Ritchie,et al.  Simple model to estimate field-measured soil water limits , 1999 .

[24]  R. Terry,et al.  Improvement of Sandy Soils with Soil Conditioners , 1998 .

[25]  R. Evans,et al.  Soil, water, and crop characteristics important to irrigation scheduling , 1991 .

[26]  R. Feddes,et al.  Simulation of field water use and crop yield , 1978 .

[27]  G. R. Blake,et al.  Effect of an Asphalt Barrier on Water Storage and Drought Probability 1 , 1974 .

[28]  L. C. Hammond,et al.  Response of Several Vegetable Crops to Underground Asphalt Moisture Barrier in Lakeland Fine Sand , 1967 .

[29]  L. C. Brunstrum,et al.  Increasing Crop Yields with Underground Asphalt Moisture Barriers , 1967 .