Brain Networks Engaged in Audiovisual Integration During Speech Perception Revealed by Persistent Homology-Based Network Filtration

The human brain naturally integrates audiovisual information to improve speech perception. However, in noisy environments, understanding speech is difficult and may require much effort. Although the brain network is supposed to be engaged in speech perception, it is unclear how speech-related brain regions are connected during natural bimodal audiovisual or unimodal speech perception with counterpart irrelevant noise. To investigate the topological changes of speech-related brain networks at all possible thresholds, we used a persistent homological framework through hierarchical clustering, such as single linkage distance, to analyze the connected component of the functional network during speech perception using functional magnetic resonance imaging. For speech perception, bimodal (audio-visual speech cue) or unimodal speech cues with counterpart irrelevant noise (auditory white-noise or visual gum-chewing) were delivered to 15 subjects. In terms of positive relationship, similar connected components were observed in bimodal and unimodal speech conditions during filtration. However, during speech perception by congruent audiovisual stimuli, the tighter couplings of left anterior temporal gyrus-anterior insula component and right premotor-visual components were observed than auditory or visual speech cue conditions, respectively. Interestingly, visual speech is perceived under white noise by tight negative coupling in the left inferior frontal region-right anterior cingulate, left anterior insula, and bilateral visual regions, including right middle temporal gyrus, right fusiform components. In conclusion, the speech brain network is tightly positively or negatively connected, and can reflect efficient or effortful processes during natural audiovisual integration or lip-reading, respectively, in speech perception.

[1]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Disrupted Modularity and Local Connectivity of Brain Functional Networks in Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia , 2010, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[2]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The small world of the cerebral cortex , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[3]  E. Bullmore,et al.  A Resilient, Low-Frequency, Small-World Human Brain Functional Network with Highly Connected Association Cortical Hubs , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[5]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  Ki-Young Jung,et al.  Classification of epilepsy types through global network analysis of scalp electroencephalograms. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  S. Scott,et al.  Converging Language Streams in the Human Temporal Lobe , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Danielle Smith Bassett,et al.  Small-World Brain Networks , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[9]  Iiro P. Jääskeläinen,et al.  Effective Cerebral Connectivity during Silent Speech Reading Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Facundo Mémoli,et al.  Characterization, Stability and Convergence of Hierarchical Clustering Methods , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[11]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  THE HUMAN CONNECTOME: A COMPLEX NETWORK , 2011, Schizophrenia Research.

[12]  H. Shu,et al.  Task-modulated activation and functional connectivity of the temporal and frontal areas during speech comprehension , 2013, Neuroscience.

[13]  N. A. Borghese,et al.  A functional-anatomical model for lipreading. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  The Selective Role of Premotor Cortex in Speech Perception: A Contribution to Phoneme Judgements but not Speech Comprehension , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  K. von Kriegstein,et al.  Functional Connectivity between Face-Movement and Speech-Intelligibility Areas during Auditory-Only Speech Perception , 2014, PloS one.

[16]  P F Seitz,et al.  The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Michael J. Martinez,et al.  Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analyzed using the ICBM‐152 brain template , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[18]  S. Scott,et al.  Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  Hermann Ackermann,et al.  The contribution(s) of the insula to speech production: a review of the clinical and functional imaging literature , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[20]  Ming C. Lin,et al.  Simulation-Based Joint Estimation of Body Deformation and Elasticity Parameters for Medical Image Analysis , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Bung-Nyun Kim,et al.  Persistent Brain Network Homology From the Perspective of Dendrogram , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  L. Fadiga,et al.  Listener-speaker perceived distance predicts the degree of motor contribution to speech perception. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  S. Scott,et al.  Speech comprehension aided by multiple modalities: Behavioural and neural interactions , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Hermann Ackermann,et al.  The contribution of the insula to motor aspects of speech production: A review and a hypothesis , 2004, Brain and Language.

[25]  K. Çiftçi,et al.  Minimum Spanning Tree Reflects the Alterations of the Default Mode Network During Alzheimer’s Disease , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  H. Berendse,et al.  The application of graph theoretical analysis to complex networks in the brain , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  Bryon A. Mueller,et al.  Altered resting state complexity in schizophrenia , 2012, NeuroImage.

[28]  R. Hari,et al.  Viewing Lip Forms Cortical Dynamics , 2002, Neuron.

[29]  Hyejin Kang,et al.  The neural correlates of cross-modal interaction in speech perception during a semantic decision task on sentences: A PET study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[30]  Valerio Pascucci,et al.  Time-varying Reeb graphs for continuous space-time data , 2008, Comput. Geom..

[31]  D. Ringach,et al.  Topological analysis of population activity in visual cortex. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[32]  E. Halgren,et al.  Responses of Human Anterior Cingulate Cortex Microdomains to Error Detection, Conflict Monitoring, Stimulus-Response Mapping, Familiarity, and Orienting , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Evan Balaban,et al.  Multivariate activation and connectivity patterns discriminate speech intelligibility in Wernicke's, Broca's, and Geschwind's areas. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The cortical organization of speech processing , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[35]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Small-world and scale-free organization of voxel-based resting-state functional connectivity in the human brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[36]  S. Scott,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Functional Integration across Brain Regions Improves Speech Perception under Adverse Listening Conditions , 2022 .

[37]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Effective connectivity analysis demonstrates involvement of premotor cortex during speech perception , 2011, NeuroImage.

[38]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. , 1997, Science.