Framing in cognitive clinical interviews about intuitive science knowledge: Dynamic student understandings of the discourse interaction

Researchers in the science education community make extensive use of cognitive clinical interviews as windows into student knowledge and thinking. Despite our familiarity with the interviews, there has been very limited research addressing the ways that students understand these interactions. In this work, we examine students' behaviors and speech patterns in a set of clinical interviews about chemistry for evidence of their tacit understandings and underlying expectations about the activity in which they are engaged. We draw on the construct of framing from anthropology and sociolinguistics and identify clusters of behaviors that indicate that students may alternatively frame the interview as inquiry, an oral examination, or an expert interview. We present two examples of students shifting between frames during the course of individual interviews. By examining the surrounding interaction, we identify both conceptual and epistemological interviewer cues that facilitate and constrain frame shifts. We discuss the implications of dynamic student framing, that is identifiable in student behaviors and discourse, for researchers who use clinical interviews to map student's intuitive science knowledge. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 96:572–599, 2012

[1]  M. Pressley,et al.  Discourse Patterns and Collaborative Scientific Reasoning in Peer and Teacher-Guided Discussions , 1999 .

[2]  A. Graesser,et al.  Question Asking During Tutoring , 1994 .

[3]  J. McMenamy Entering the Childʼs Mind: The Clinical Interview in Psychological Research and Practice , 1999 .

[4]  David Hammer,et al.  Attending to student epistemological framing in a science classroom , 2010 .

[5]  M. Khine Perspectives on scientific argumentation : theory, practice and research , 2012 .

[6]  David Hammer,et al.  Students’ Framings and Their Participation in Scientific Argumentation , 2012 .

[7]  G. Posner,et al.  A revisionist theory of conceptual change , 1992 .

[8]  George J. Posner,et al.  The clinical interview and the measurement of conceptual change , 1982 .

[9]  Bruce L Sherin,et al.  How Students Understand Physics Equations , 2001 .

[10]  S. Duncan,et al.  Some Signals and Rules for Taking Speaking Turns in Conversations , 1972 .

[11]  Leif Östman,et al.  Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism , 2002 .

[12]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Opening up Closings , 1973 .

[13]  James A. Middleton,et al.  Design Research Perspectives on Transitioning From Individual Microgenetic Interviews to a Whole-Class Teaching Experiment , 2009 .

[14]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Knowledge in pieces : An evolving framework for understanding knowing and learning , 1988 .

[15]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. , 1996 .

[16]  R. Sawyer The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Introduction , 2014 .

[17]  Bruce L Sherin,et al.  Common sense clarified: The role of intuitive knowledge in physics problem solving , 2006 .

[18]  J. Lemke Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .

[19]  David Hammer,et al.  Framing for scientific argumentation , 2012 .

[20]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[21]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Child's Conception of the World , 1971 .

[22]  Jan Wyndhamn,et al.  Understanding practice: Solving everyday problems in the formal setting: An empirical study of the school as context for thought , 1993 .

[23]  R. Glaser,et al.  Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment , 2001 .

[24]  G. Forman,et al.  Constructivism in the computer age , 1988 .

[25]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Innovations in learning : new environments for education , 1996 .

[26]  Herbert P. Ginsburg,et al.  The Clinical Interview in Psychological Research on Mathematical Thinking: Aims, Rationales, Techniques. , 1981 .

[27]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Knowing What You Tell, Telling What You Know: Uncertainty and Asymmetries of Meaning in Interpreting Graphical Data , 2006 .

[28]  L. Mason,et al.  Reconsidering conceptual change: issues in theory and practice , 2002 .

[29]  R. A. Engle Framing Interactions to Foster Generative Learning: A Situative Explanation of Transfer in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2006 .

[30]  E. Schegloff Analyzing Single Episodes of Interaction: An Exercise in Conversation Analysis , 1987 .

[31]  David Hammer,et al.  Student Behavior and Epistemological Framing: Examples from Collaborative Active-Learning Activities in Physics , 2007, ICLS.

[32]  R. Good,et al.  Students' Conceptual Ecologies and the Process of Conceptual Change in Evolution. , 1995 .

[33]  Clotilde Pontecorvo,et al.  Children's Talk in Classroom Discussions , 1992 .

[34]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[35]  Helge Strömdahl,et al.  Conceptions and Contexts: On the Interpretation of Interview and Observational Data , 2007 .

[36]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Physics Education Research: Modeling student thinking , 2004 .

[37]  J. Piaget The Child's Conception of Number , 1953 .

[38]  Wolff‐Michael Roth The Nature of Scientific Conceptions: A Discursive Psychological Perspective. , 2008 .

[39]  David Hammer,et al.  Novice Teachers' Attention to Student Thinking , 2009 .

[40]  Herbert P. Ginsburg,et al.  The Challenge of Formative Assessment in Mathematics Education: Children’s Minds, Teachers’ Minds , 2009, Human Development.

[41]  Sherry A. Southerland,et al.  Understanding students' explanations of biological phenomena: Conceptual frameworks or p‐prims? , 2001 .

[42]  A. diSessa Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[43]  Reinders Duit,et al.  Bibliography. Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education. 2nd Edition. , 1988 .

[44]  C. Briggs Learning How to Ask: A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of the Interview in Social Science Research , 1986 .

[45]  S. Mayer The early evolution of Jean Piaget's clinical method. , 2005, History of psychology.

[46]  A. Collins,et al.  Epistemic forms and Epistemic Games: Structures and Strategies to Guide Inquiry , 1993 .

[47]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[48]  A. diSessa Why “Conceptual Ecology” is a Good Idea , 2002 .

[49]  Herbert P. Ginsburg,et al.  Entering the child's mind , 1997 .

[50]  Deborah Tannen,et al.  Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/Interview , 1987 .

[51]  J. Lave,et al.  Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context , 1996 .

[52]  Courtney B. Cazden,et al.  Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Second Edition. , 2001 .

[53]  Michèle Grossen,et al.  Clinical Interviews As Verbal Interactions: A Multidisciplinary Outlook Introduction , 1998 .

[54]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring , 1995 .

[55]  A. diSessa An Interactional Analysis of Clinical Interviewing , 2007 .

[56]  M. Agar Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative , 1988 .

[57]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures , 1978 .

[58]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice , 1992 .

[59]  Steven E. Clayman,et al.  Displaying Neutrality in Television News Interviews , 1988 .

[60]  David Hammer,et al.  Multiple Epistemological Coherences in an Eighth-Grade Discussion of the Rock Cycle , 2006 .

[61]  Andrew Elby,et al.  Resources , framing , and transfer , 2004 .

[62]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Do interviews really assess students’ knowledge? , 1998 .