The Dynamics of Distortion: How Successive Summarization Alters the Retelling of News

This work advances and tests a theory of how news information evolves as it is successively retold by consumers. Drawing on data from over 11,000 participants across ten experiments, the authors offer evidence that when news is repeatedly retold, it undergoes a stylistic transformation termed “disagreeable personalization,” wherein original facts are increasingly supplanted by opinions and interpretations with a slant toward negativity. The central thesis is that when retellers believe they are more (vs. less) knowledgeable than their recipient about the information they are relaying, they feel more compelled to provide guidance on its meaning and to do so in a persuasive manner. This enhanced motivation to guide persuasively, in turn, leads retellers to not only select the subset of facts they deem most essential but, critically, to provide their interpretations and opinions on those facts, with negativity being used as a means of grabbing their audience’s attention. Implications of this work for research on retelling and consumer information diffusion are explored.

[1]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  On Braggarts and Gossips: A Self-Enhancement Account of Word-of-Mouth Generation and Transmission , 2012 .

[2]  Elizabeth J. Marsh,et al.  Retelling Is Not the Same as Recalling , 2007 .

[3]  Ustin,et al.  Spreading Non-natural Concepts : The Role of Intuitive Conceptual Structures in Memory and Transmission of Cultural Materials ¤ , 2004 .

[4]  Junyi Jessy Li,et al.  Fast and Accurate Prediction of Sentence Specificity , 2015, AAAI.

[5]  Anne C. Pisor,et al.  Negatively-Biased Credulity and the Cultural Evolution of Beliefs , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  Janyce Wiebe,et al.  Recognizing Contextual Polarity in Phrase-Level Sentiment Analysis , 2005, HLT.

[7]  I. Hyman.  Conversational remembering: story recall with a peer versus for an experimenter , 1994 .

[8]  R. H. Knapp,et al.  A PSYCHOLOGY OF RUMOR , 1944 .

[9]  Tor Bjørklund,et al.  OPINION LEADERSHIP AND POLITICAL EXTREMISM , 1991 .

[10]  P. Fournier,et al.  Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Arnaud Legout,et al.  Social Clicks: What and Who Gets Read on Twitter? , 2016, SIGMETRICS.

[12]  G. Clore,et al.  Attraction and disagreement-produced arousal. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  T. Griffiths,et al.  A rational analysis of the effects of memory biases on serial reproduction , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  The Evaluative Lexicon 2.0: The measurement of emotionality, extremity, and valence in language , 2017, Behavior Research Methods.

[15]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Lost in Propagation? Unfolding News Cycles from the Source , 2021, ICWSM.

[16]  Chang Sup Park,et al.  Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Ani Nenkova,et al.  Automatically Assessing Machine Summary Content Without a Gold Standard , 2013, CL.

[18]  R. P. Fishburne,et al.  Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel , 1975 .

[19]  Alex Mesoudi,et al.  A bias for social information in human cultural transmission. , 2006, British journal of psychology.

[20]  German Neubaum,et al.  Examining Characteristics of Opinion Leaders in Social Media: A Motivational Approach , 2016 .

[21]  Emma Flynn,et al.  Serial killers, spiders and cybersex: Social and survival information bias in the transmission of urban legends. , 2015, British journal of psychology.

[22]  Edward B. Royzman,et al.  Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion , 2001 .

[23]  Christopher M. Danforth,et al.  Temporal Patterns of Happiness and Information in a Global Social Network: Hedonometrics and Twitter , 2011, PloS one.

[24]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  What Makes Online Content Viral? , 2012 .

[25]  T. M. Ellison,et al.  The sky is falling: evidence of a negativity bias in the social transmission of information , 2017 .

[26]  Yoshihisa Kashima,et al.  Maintaining Cultural Stereotypes in the Serial Reproduction of Narratives , 2000 .

[27]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  From Rumors to Facts, and Facts to Rumors: The Role of Certainty Decay in Consumer Communications , 2011 .

[28]  Jonah Berger,et al.  Broadcasting and Narrowcasting: How Audience Size Affects What People Share , 2013 .

[29]  C. Heath,et al.  Do People Prefer to Pass Along Good or Bad News? Valence and Relevance of News as Predictors of Transmission Propensity , 1996, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[30]  K. Vohs,et al.  Case Western Reserve University , 1990 .

[31]  H. Roediger,et al.  Bartlett revisited: Direct comparison of repeated reproduction and serial reproduction techniques , 2014 .

[32]  Claire Cardie,et al.  Playing the Telephone Game: Determining the Hierarchical Structure of Perspective and Speech Expressions , 2004, COLING.

[33]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. , 1987 .

[34]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Telling a Story or Telling it Straight: The Effects of Entertaining Versus Accurate Retellings on Memory , 2004 .

[35]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[36]  Jonah A. Berger.  Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research , 2014 .