OD-NETBAND: An Approach for Origin–Destination Based Network Progression Band Optimization

Traditional progression band optimization methods are focused on providing uninterrupted flow along arterial streets. For arterials with significant traffic streams joining and leaving from side streets, these approaches often generate poor traffic signal control performance. To address this deficiency, an origin–destination (OD) information based progression band optimization model, OD-BAND, was formulated to coordinate signals for arterials with major side-street traffic streams. This paper aims to extend the OD-BAND model further to address the OD based traffic signal coordination problem in multi-arterial grid networks. The extended model is able to create separate progression bands for each major OD stream in the network. In this expanded model, individual arterials are connected with loop constraints to ensure that offsets derived via different paths for a particular intersection are equal. The new OD-NETBAND model is formulated as a mixed integer linear program that maximizes the sum of each major OD stream’s progression bandwidth. It can optimize simultaneously cycle length, offsets, and phase sequences for the entire network. Performance of the new model is evaluated with AIMSUN microscopic simulation and is compared with MAXBAND-86 and Synchro results.

[1]  Nathan H. Gartner,et al.  Arterial traffic signal coordination utilizing vehicular traffic origin-destination information , 2014, 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[2]  Nathan H. Gartner,et al.  AM-Band: An Asymmetrical Multi-Band model for arterial traffic signal coordination , 2015 .

[3]  John D. C. Little,et al.  MAXBAND: A PROGRAM FOR SETTING SIGNALS ON ARTERIES AND TRIANGULAR NETWORKS , 1981 .

[4]  John D. C. Little,et al.  The Synchronization of Traffic Signals by Mixed-Integer Linear Programming , 2011, Oper. Res..

[5]  Carroll J Messer,et al.  PASSER IV: A PROGRAM FOR OPTIMIZING SIGNAL TIMING IN GRID NETWORKS (WITH DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE) , 1993 .

[6]  N. Gartner Letter to the Editor---Constraining Relations Among Offsets in Synchronized Signal Networks , 1972 .

[7]  Tugba Arsava,et al.  Arterial Progression Optimization Using OD-BAND: Case Study and Extensions , 2016 .

[8]  Zong Tian,et al.  Effectiveness of Lead–Lag Phasing on Progression Bandwidth , 2008 .

[9]  Carroll J Messer,et al.  MAXBAND-86: Program for optimizing left-turn phase sequence in multiarterial closed networks. , 1988 .

[10]  Nathan H. Gartner,et al.  Progression Optimization Featuring Arterial- and Route-Based Priority Signal Networks , 2004, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[11]  Nathan H. Gartner,et al.  MULTIBAND-96: A Program for Variable-Bandwidth Progression Optimization of Multiarterial Traffic Networks , 1996 .

[12]  Nathan H. Gartner,et al.  A multi-band approach to arterial traffic signal optimization , 1991 .

[13]  Gabriel Gomes,et al.  Bandwidth Maximization Using Vehicle Arrival Functions , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[14]  Nathan H. Gartner,et al.  MULTIBAND--A VARIABLE-BANDWIDTH ARTERIAL PROGRESSION SCHEME , 1990 .

[15]  Xiao Kuan Yang,et al.  Comparison among computer packages in providing timing plans for Iowa arterial in Lawrence, Kansas , 2001 .

[16]  Nathan H. Gartner,et al.  PROGRESSION OPTIMIZATION IN LARGE SCALE URBAN TRAFFIC NETWORKS: A HEURISTIC DECOMPOSITION APPROACH , 1999 .

[17]  Thomas Urbanik,et al.  Traffic Signal Optimization Program for Oversaturated Conditions: Genetic Algorithm Approach , 1999 .

[18]  N. Gartner,et al.  Arterial-based control of traffic flow in urban grid networks , 2002 .